Beat the invincible SC Mach1 + SC GT vs LS3 cam only
05-08-2010, 05:36 PM
#61
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, just because daddy used to sneak into your bed at night, doesnt mean everyone likes men. If your looking for a boyfriend, im sure you can impress one with 657. Does it bother you that you spent all the money on your little Mach 1 and have lower numbers than a simple blower swapped Cobra? As for the town, Yes, they named it Princeton so us dumb cowboy folk would feel smarter.... and it worked.
and what's with the dick measure contest n00b?
05-08-2010, 05:42 PM
#62
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have only seen 118 out of it but it does do 3 more mph then that in the 1/8th mile then when it ran 118 so it's probably about that speed.
Last edited by PistonSlap.com; 05-08-2010 at 05:49 PM.
05-08-2010, 06:14 PM
#63
Teching In
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Princeton Tx
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I've been on this forum since about 2006. Figured I'd become active on these forums again. As far as your contest, i'm just responding. I've been involved in all 3 of these races, and y'all want to bash everything from the cars to the drivers and even the location. Op posts s video and people start telling him his cars slow, talking how fast "they" are. Y'all aren't impressed with a cammed C6, I'm not impressed with 657 rwhp. Problem is We'll never be able to line them up so this is like debating with a wall. As for the rest of us " dumb cowboys" including the OP. Well see you guys thursday.
05-08-2010, 09:11 PM
#66
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I've been on this forum since about 2006. Figured I'd become active on these forums again. As far as your contest, i'm just responding. I've been involved in all 3 of these races, and y'all want to bash everything from the cars to the drivers and even the location. Op posts s video and people start telling him his cars slow, talking how fast "they" are. Y'all aren't impressed with a cammed C6, I'm not impressed with 657 rwhp. Problem is We'll never be able to line them up so this is like debating with a wall. As for the rest of us " dumb cowboys" including the OP. Well see you guys thursday.
I also like the guys S197. THose things are nice blown especially with a Saleen TS. We merely have a difference of opinino on what's safe with the stock internals on a DD. That's all.
As for TRmach1..........I know him from the registry and svtp. I have no doubt he respects other cars. Maybe I misunderstood his post, but I took it as nothing more than good fun humor. Where it changed is when an obviously slower, less powered Fbod turned into something. But again, that's my perception.
05-08-2010, 10:50 PM
#67
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice, funny to see some FORCED INDUCTION mustangs try to keep up with an n/a vette.
throw some boost on there and tell them you'll match boost for a run
also for the guys saying he shouldve beaten them worse, notice he put heavier wheels on the car, as well as some sloppy shifting
throw some boost on there and tell them you'll match boost for a run
also for the guys saying he shouldve beaten them worse, notice he put heavier wheels on the car, as well as some sloppy shifting
Rice.
05-08-2010, 11:43 PM
#68
Teching In
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for TRmach1..........I know him from the registry and svtp. I have no doubt he respects other cars. Maybe I misunderstood his post, but I took it as nothing more than good fun humor. Where it changed is when an obviously slower, less powered Fbod turned into something. But again, that's my perception.
05-09-2010, 08:37 AM
#70
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Princeton, Texas
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't see anyone say they weren't impressed. Especially with the C6. The bashing that I saw (my perception) was 'left over' from mongoose and his **** talking from before this race. If you arne' familiar with it, search his name.
I also like the guys S197. THose things are nice blown especially with a Saleen TS. We merely have a difference of opinino on what's safe with the stock internals on a DD. That's all.
As for TRmach1..........I know him from the registry and svtp. I have no doubt he respects other cars. Maybe I misunderstood his post, but I took it as nothing more than good fun humor. Where it changed is when an obviously slower, less powered Fbod turned into something. But again, that's my perception.
I also like the guys S197. THose things are nice blown especially with a Saleen TS. We merely have a difference of opinino on what's safe with the stock internals on a DD. That's all.
As for TRmach1..........I know him from the registry and svtp. I have no doubt he respects other cars. Maybe I misunderstood his post, but I took it as nothing more than good fun humor. Where it changed is when an obviously slower, less powered Fbod turned into something. But again, that's my perception.
I have also been a part of every single race in this thread. That's why I was posting.... Ya'll take this stuff too serious.... =)
I'm a roundy rounder anyway...Dirt track racing FTW!
05-09-2010, 09:29 AM
#71
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Princeton, Texas
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, I'll try to be included in the vids @ next week's meet so ya'll can see that I'm not just forum talk...
Should make for interesting video as there's always a chance a rod could come through the hood. =)
And as far as the three cars in the original post, they are all sweet rides. All three perform better than average cars with similar mods IMO.
Should make for interesting video as there's always a chance a rod could come through the hood. =)
And as far as the three cars in the original post, they are all sweet rides. All three perform better than average cars with similar mods IMO.
05-09-2010, 05:59 PM
#72
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I want to understand the logic of people saying my car doesn't make what I claim.
2009 Z51 C6 weighs:
3250 + me (240) = close to 3500 lb race weight.
The mach1 with driver was around 3600.
That and in the heat 487 vs 467.. for some reason I should put bus lengths on him?
487 dyno @21CMC dynojet 103 intake temp:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...m-results.html
Same exact mods. Different dyno. 495rwhp dyno @LG 63 degree day:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...hp-25torq.html
2009 Z51 C6 weighs:
3250 + me (240) = close to 3500 lb race weight.
The mach1 with driver was around 3600.
That and in the heat 487 vs 467.. for some reason I should put bus lengths on him?
487 dyno @21CMC dynojet 103 intake temp:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...m-results.html
Same exact mods. Different dyno. 495rwhp dyno @LG 63 degree day:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...hp-25torq.html
05-09-2010, 06:16 PM
#73
Cam only LS3 vette with 490 rwhp, 130 + mph trap speed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpNSPnu9YZ8
Also 128 mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bvL60sUkSI
Also 128 mph
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bvL60sUkSI
05-09-2010, 06:44 PM
#77
What did the mustang trap? Vettes usually gain 25-29 mph on the back half. I'd guess you'd trap 122-124 mph. Which would not be a realistic figure for a 490 rwhp vette at a sea level track with good air. But, there are also many other factors, what elevation is your track and what density altitude you ran in can make a major difference in et / mph.
05-09-2010, 06:47 PM
#78
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess these guys are slow too:
Vengence cammed C6 11.65 @124:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj7ypWPOmKY&NR=1
Cammed C6 11.5 @ 123
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWJ9RQBhB3g
Track I went to was Elevation: 645 feet
DA was: 800-1200
So I do not think either made a huge factor. If I hooked better I may see an extra mph or 2.
Vengence cammed C6 11.65 @124:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj7ypWPOmKY&NR=1
Cammed C6 11.5 @ 123
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWJ9RQBhB3g
Track I went to was Elevation: 645 feet
DA was: 800-1200
So I do not think either made a huge factor. If I hooked better I may see an extra mph or 2.
05-09-2010, 06:58 PM
#79
First car is the vengeance stage II LS3 which is not a 490 rwhp setup. Other car I do not know the cam and that car ran in 97 degree heat. Look up the venegeance stage II, it an auto it put down 440 or so ? I'm not saying your car is slow or anything, you asked why people would question your 490 rwhp. Apples to apples man, with 495 rwhp and with that DA at your elevation you should be 126 + mph
Vengeance stage II LS3 473 rwhp. You have 20 more hp so you should be faster than that other car. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...idle-clip.html
Vengeance stage II LS3 473 rwhp. You have 20 more hp so you should be faster than that other car. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...idle-clip.html
05-09-2010, 07:11 PM
#80
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I don't see the point in inflating my #'s. Dynos are legit not photoshop. My car has 126+ in it I am sure. Just not at the track I went to.. couldn't hook.