Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

'11 5.0 vs '01 SS : Driver response/Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2010, 10:01 PM
  #201  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
THERE IS NO WAY, 350rwhp in a 3300lb race weight car, will trap 118-119. They are not stock, I don't care what they tell you.
Look it up. is not very hard to work. Fastest et for a BONE STOCK C5 Z06 is 11.78, fastest mph is 120.65mph.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-z...fast-list.html
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:33 PM
  #202  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bitemark46
Then your bro needs to learn how to drive. Please explain to us idiots on the physics. 112 mph is plenty of mph to run an 11 sec pass and most certainly a mid 12.

Eagerly waits with pen and pencil ready for explanation.
Given the 5.0 has the 3.73 rear and 245 tires:

If the 5.0 has 370rwhp, it does not produce enough power to overcome the torque spin of the tires that would be generated at the line. Your torque multiplication in first and in second would be such:

1st-12.23
2nd-10.82

Even with 75 percent throttle, with 390 foot pounds, you would not have enough surface rubber(tire) to propel the car at a quick enough rate to run a 12.7 or lower. In order for the 370rwhp, 3800lb race weight 5.0 to run 12.7 or lower, you would need a fairly hard launch. You won't get that with the stock tire. The 5.0 does not make enough upper rpm hp to compensate for the lack of traction off the line to run such times. Too much torque at such a low rpm coupled with the drive train gearing. Its too much for a 245 size tire to handle at a required rpm launch .

If you had 425rwhp, then yes. Cause you have the sufficient power upstairs to compensate for a lower rpm launch.

Simplified
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:39 PM
  #203  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
Given the 5.0 has the 3.73 rear and 245 tires:

If the 5.0 has 370rwhp, it does not produce enough power to overcome the torque spin of the tires that would be generated at the line. Your torque multiplication in first and in second would be such:

1st-12.23
2nd-10.82

Even with 75 percent throttle, with 390 foot pounds, you would not have enough surface rubber(tire) to propel the car at a quick enough rate to run a 12.7 or lower. In order for the 370rwhp, 3800lb race weight 5.0 to run 12.7 or lower, you would need a fairly hard launch. You won't get that with the stock tire. The 5.0 does not make enough upper rpm hp to compensate for the lack of traction off the line to run such times. Too much torque at such a low rpm coupled with the drive train gearing. Its too much for a 245 size tire to handle at a required rpm launch .

If you had 425rwhp, then yes. Cause you have the sufficient power upstairs to compensate for a lower rpm launch.

Simplified
It doesn't matter what you type... the cars still run what they run. Camaros have ~380rwhp, have a 4100lb race weight, and have gone as low as 12.58. I'm sure that doesn't add up to you either.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:51 PM
  #204  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Look it up. is not very hard to work. Fastest et for a BONE STOCK C5 Z06 is 11.78, fastest mph is 120.65mph.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-z...fast-list.html
I don't care what google says. It is mathematically impossible to run 120mph with 350ish rwhp at 3300lb. They are exaggerating or the car has more than 350rwhp. Those times are reserved for the C6 Z06.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:52 PM
  #205  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
It doesn't matter what you type... the cars still run what they run. Camaros have ~380rwhp, have a 4100lb race weight, and have gone as low as 12.58. I'm sure that doesn't add up to you either.
Do the Camaros have the same trans, tires and rear as the 5.0?
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:56 PM
  #206  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
I don't care what google says. It is mathematically impossible to run 120mph with 350ish rwhp at 3300lb. They are exaggerating or the car has more than 350rwhp. Those times are reserved for the C6 Z06.
You're a ******* idiot. No two ways around it. Record for a stock C6 Z06 is 10.9x @ 129.xx IIRC, btw.
Originally Posted by jabawalkie
Do the Camaros have the same trans, tires and rear as the 5.0?
Plug it into your magic little electronic dragstrip and see what you get. Were you that thorough when you exclaimed to the whole world that it is physically impossible for a stock '11 GT to run 12.7?
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:59 PM
  #207  
Banned
 
02 wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
You're a ******* idiot. No two ways around it. Record for a stock C6 Z06 is 10.9x @ 129.xx IIRC, btw.


Plug it into your magic little electronic dragstrip and see what you get. Were you that thorough when you exclaimed to the whole world that it is physically impossible for a stock '11 GT to run 12.7?
They should've used that 12.7 mustang against the livernois 2010 sho. That SHO is a high 12sec car. The 5.0 is a joke!
02 wife is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:02 PM
  #208  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02 wife
They should've used that 12.7 mustang against the livernois 2010 sho. That SHO is a high 12sec car. The 5.0 is a joke!
Don't be mad that a light bolt-on GT ran faster than your heads/cam/stall Z28
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:04 PM
  #209  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02 wife
The 5.0 is a joke!
LOL who can take you seriously?
Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:05 PM
  #210  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
You're a ******* idiot. No two ways around it. Record for a stock C6 Z06 is 10.9x @ 129.xx IIRC, btw.


Plug it into your magic little electronic dragstrip and see what you get. Were you that thorough when you exclaimed to the whole world that it is physically impossible for a stock '11 GT to run 12.7?
Wow, name calling. How old are you again? At least 129mph comes somewhat close to its setup.

Its simple physics. NHRA drag teams use it all the time, its what the professionals do. With a 245 all season tire and the #s I had mentioned before, you will not reach 12.70 or lower. Is there a chance? There is always a chance I guess, but I wouldn't even put a dollar on it. Now, the more hp and wider the tire, the greater the chance. Hell, just the wider the tire would suffice.

Don't just take my word for it, talk to evolution performance and ask them why they installed different upper and lower control arms.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:09 PM
  #211  
Banned
 
02 wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Don't be mad that a light bolt-on GT ran faster than your heads/cam/stall Z28
LOL dont change the subject! We all know that your hero evolution mustang was gutted running on slicks and skinnys. had full suspension and tuned to the max! Lets see a repeat of that performance. I will be at milan dragway tommorow I hope one of those 5.0 drivers lines up against me thinking hes about to whup a stock looking Ls1 camaro. He's gonna be in for a surprise lol!
02 wife is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:10 PM
  #212  
Banned
 
02 wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
LOL who can take you seriously?
You do.
02 wife is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:31 PM
  #213  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02 wife
You do.
Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:33 PM
  #214  
Registered User
 
Sarahgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

03 cobra> 11 mustang gt... If you ask me. How much rwhp can you get out of the 2011 gt with a stock block?? Oh wait nooo-one knows?? Ok so why brag about the car yet. What if its almost maxed out. Internals are forged so either A ford did that because knew people would slap a s/c on it and make it helloffast or B It needed it because motor was close to its limits.. I may be wrong who knows but thats what i think..
Sarahgto is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:36 PM
  #215  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sarahgto
03 cobra> 11 mustang gt... If you ask me. How much rwhp can you get out of the 2011 gt with a stock block?? Oh wait nooo-one knows?? Ok so why brag about the car yet. What if its almost maxed out. Internals are forged so either A ford did that because knew people would slap a s/c on it and make it helloffast or B It needed it because motor was close to its limits.. I may be wrong who knows but thats what i think..
im pretty sure the 11 GT doesnt have forged bottom end.
MauriSSio is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:47 PM
  #216  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I fail to understand what is not impressive about a stock 5.0L N/A motor that makes 360-370rwhp N/A and drives and idles like a Honda Accord. Whats the problem here?
Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:50 PM
  #217  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I fail to understand what is not impressive about a stock 5.0L N/A motor that makes 360-370rwhp N/A and drives and idles like a Honda Accord. Whats the problem here?
It drives and idles like a Honda accord
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 11:54 PM
  #218  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
It drives and idles like a Honda accord
I would rather my car idle smooth at 750rpms and drive like it did stock and make the power it does. Sadly thats just not going to happen N/A. With the 2011 5.0 you get this.
Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 12:19 AM
  #219  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why does this thread continue?

You guys want to argue about the difference between the terms lamp and light bulb?
P.S, the correct term is lamp.
DiscerningZ32 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 12:20 AM
  #220  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I would rather my car idle smooth at 750rpms and drive like it did stock and make the power it does. Sadly thats just not going to happen N/A. With the 2011 5.0 you get this.
Yeah, I know. Ive got a lt1 vette with a 236/240 cam at a 110 and its starting to give me parkinsons.
jabawalkie is offline  


Quick Reply: '11 5.0 vs '01 SS : Driver response/Info



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.