Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

'11 5.0 vs '01 SS : Driver response/Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2010, 07:09 AM
  #41  
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
JayplaySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, OH
Posts: 4,615
Received 161 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bene
This should end the thread of the other one. No more ifs or buts.

This will end the other one even though I thought otherwise at first.
JayplaySS is offline  
Old 05-15-2010, 08:23 AM
  #42  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LankyLS-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pearland
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Fairly wet weather currently around here and supposedly will be for the weekend. I'm sure we'll get out when the streets are dry.
LankyLS-1 is offline  
Old 05-15-2010, 08:36 AM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can't wait to see another run with these two cars, more so with the Mustang broken in and the driver having a good feel for it. At that point I expect to see the 5.0 pull on the SS but should still be a good race. Do it from a dig and from a roll just to see how both turn out.
jmurray87 is offline  
Old 05-15-2010, 09:15 AM
  #44  
Staging Lane
 
wise690's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Two very nice cars, have fun with them.

There's more than enough Ford "nut hugging" over there
^Agreed. This is a GM website, what do you expect? I don't know why that's so hard to understand...
wise690 is offline  
Old 05-15-2010, 09:29 PM
  #45  
On The Tree
 
unknown pontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

on the first thread about the 5.0 going 11.8 we gm guys never said it was slow just close too maxed out. Now we see it's not as fast as they say. Ford guys said its not maxed out, we don't know that. Now we see there's lots of room for improvment. After they break in they will only dyno close to 350hp stock if that. After all these years ford made a match for the 4th gen. It's ok ford guys don't give up just mod it up,

cough, cough. superchargers

Your friend kenny bell will come through.

Last edited by unknown pontiac; 05-15-2010 at 09:34 PM. Reason: typo
unknown pontiac is offline  
Old 05-15-2010, 10:27 PM
  #46  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With 11 to 1 compression, they better carry a good size broom in the truck. Cause they'll be sweeping pieces of their engine off the road.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 06:58 AM
  #47  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
RaggedRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wilkes-barre
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Speaking of references to EP's 11.8. Why is it that folks keep yelling maxed out when the car had a ******* x-pipe, catback, intake and tune? Headers, then eventually cams and ported heads will make their ways into these cars. The older 4 valves liked massive gears, so maybe these will be the same. EP's car was far from maxed out. That's like putting a lid and full exhaust on a T56'd LS1 and saying "Gaawwwdammmm Clem itz bilt 2 teh maXx!121."
RaggedRides is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 08:08 AM
  #48  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LankyLS-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pearland
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIZNEz9b-EI

He took the 5.0 to the dyno yesterday. Put down good numbers - 371rwhp in 4th gear, 365rwhp in 5th gear (5th is 1:1 in these cars).

The story of the vid is going to be completely different with the TC off. Not only can you feel the difference in power output on the street, you can hear it in the way the motor winds up.

It will be interesting to see what kind of nanny controls Ford put into these once HPT cracks the PCM and we can read the full tune.
LankyLS-1 is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:04 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
02 wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It should be a good rematch.
02 wife is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:26 AM
  #50  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unknown pontiac
on the first thread about the 5.0 going 11.8 we gm guys never said it was slow just close too maxed out. Now we see it's not as fast as they say. Ford guys said its not maxed out, we don't know that. Now we see there's lots of room for improvment. After they break in they will only dyno close to 350hp stock if that. After all these years ford made a match for the 4th gen. It's ok ford guys don't give up just mod it up,

cough, cough. superchargers

Your friend kenny bell will come through.
Almost everything you posted here is wrong.
unit213 is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 11:10 AM
  #51  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Instead of racing the ls1 again, take it to the track first and get some times. More importantly, a trap speed. With that rwhp and around 3800lbs, it should trap 113-115. Otherwise that dyno was a little friendly.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 11:41 AM
  #52  
Teching In
 
05WhiteSRT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
Instead of racing the ls1 again, take it to the track first and get some times. More importantly, a trap speed. With that rwhp and around 3800lbs, it should trap 113-115. Otherwise that dyno was a little friendly.
I think that's a little high. For comparison, a C5Z puts down 350rwhp on average, weighs ~3100lbs, and goes 12.4@116 with an average driver.

The stang has about 20 more rwhp but weighs about 700 lbs more.

Just a guess, but I would say it would run 110 mph as it sits now.
05WhiteSRT4 is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 11:50 AM
  #53  
TECH Regular
 
AWDTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

unless he was spinning i dont see a difference in taking t/c off
AWDTBSS is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 11:51 AM
  #54  
Teching In
 
BigMat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chester County, Pa
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my camaro put down 367 hp 371tq and I trapped at 110 I weigh 240 and I had a half tank of gas at the time.
BigMat is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 12:05 PM
  #55  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 03Z weighs, with me in it and half a tank, 3300lb. Stock i'm trapping 115 with 348rwhp. So with 25rwhp more and 500lb more, he should be at least 113 in the quarter(maybe 112). For every 100lbs, it takes 10hp to compensate. And thats flywheel 10hp.

And don't think that the 3.31s are a slouch. His Trans gears are very aggressive. First gear is 3.28 and second is 2.90(if I remember correctly). That really helps building up speed even with the weight.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 12:58 PM
  #56  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LankyLS-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pearland
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AWDTBSS
unless he was spinning i dont see a difference in taking t/c off
One would assume that - but the 5.0 doesn't have the same type of TC that the 4th gen F-bodies does. I won't know for sure until I can look at the tune with HPT, but I'm assuming that it has torque management among other things built into it.

You have to drive it to understand it, but it isn't just cutting spark on tire spin. It 'feels' like it is cutting spark on every shift for a few seconds and gradually bringing it back in as the RPMs rise. IMHO, Ford wussed out on the production tunes. I'm just hoping HPT doesn't take long to crack the PCM so I can really see what's going on here.
LankyLS-1 is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 01:08 PM
  #57  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Man are there going to be some sad LS1 owners soon!!!

Originally Posted by Mod Mustang Racing
These cars are really impressive, we have been working on ours for a little bit and it feels like it has a good 11.80 in it! The 5.0 is back!

We are working on a turbo kit for it next!

Stopsign32v is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 02:01 PM
  #58  
Teching In
 
jabawalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigMat
my camaro put down 367 hp 371tq and I trapped at 110 I weigh 240 and I had a half tank of gas at the time.
Good info. The 5.0 is 200+ pounds lighter and has a tad more hp. So it should trap 112-113 at the least.
jabawalkie is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 02:37 PM
  #59  
TECH Regular
 
AWDTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i guess i'll just have to take ur word for it but going from a roll in the mustang gt's i have driven it never bothered me with it on
AWDTBSS is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 02:41 PM
  #60  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jabawalkie
With 11 to 1 compression, they better carry a good size broom in the truck. Cause they'll be sweeping pieces of their engine off the road.

Umm, no. I'm almost positive that the LS2's CR is 10.9:1. Don't hear of them blowing regularly, do ya?
WSsick is offline  


Quick Reply: '11 5.0 vs '01 SS : Driver response/Info



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.