Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2 near stock '02 WS6's verse 2 '11 5.0 GT's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2010, 05:07 PM
  #281  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Originally Posted by snake95
necrocannibal said he's gone 12.82(or 3) in his TA on street tires, I have no reason to doubt him.
I promise it did it. It also ran a 12.98 and a 12.92 that same night. Like i said though it was cool with no humidity and a nicely prepped track. Evan Smith ran an 02 SS to a 12.9x in high temps and thne did it again.
necrocannibal is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:09 PM
  #282  
Registered User
 
OMGLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love how we're comparing a brand new GT to a nearly 10 year old f-body.
OMGLS1 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:09 PM
  #283  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
05-10 Stangs run mid 13s to high 13s period. If someone is getting slower than that, it's not the car. The best I've seen a COMPELTELY STOCK S197 (2008) run was 13.3. I am saying 13.5 as the best.

99-04 Stangs run high 13s (VERY HIGH) to low 14s. The best I've SEEN a COMPLETELY STOCK NewEdge run was 13.7. I put the baseline as 13.9.
How can you say 05-10 runs mid-high 13s and then go on to say that 99-04 run high 13s?

You can't give the exact average for one platform... Slightly better than average for another... And slightly under the average for another.
If you are going to say what a platform runs on average you have to be COMPLETELY unbiased 110%, and I don't see that most of the time when you throw out averages. You are a LOT better than when you first got here but still are biased in many of them.

If the FASTEST you have seen is a 13.7.. Why would you put a baseline at 13.9?

Whether we like it or not.. When talking ***********************AVERAGE******************** * you can NOT take weather/driver/track prep/etc etc etc out of the equation. Why? Because that ALL plays into what cars run on AVERAGE!!!! IF you want to talk what a car is capable of... Sure take all that out of the equation.

Put it this way..... Fastest 05+ you have seen run is a 13.3... Fastest 04- you have seen is 13.7. That is .4 slower... Meaning if the 05+ is running mid-high 13s, how is the 04- running high 13s on average? You are giving a true average for one and above average for another.

I have explained this before... I don't see how you don't see what you do.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:18 PM
  #284  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
I completley disagree. Saw way too many Machs run at the track and have owned, modded and raced way too many LSx cars.
I've got a friend who is running 12.8s in his catback/intake/can tuned mach 1. People really seem to underestimate these cars. The 4.6 with a high compression ratio like the ls1s will run. Ford's mistake with the 2v and 3v were designing them for 87 octane. Mach 1 vs. f-body is always going to be a driver's race from everything I've seen personally.
Black Snake Blown is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:21 PM
  #285  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black Snake Blown
I've got a friend who is running 12.8s in his catback/intake/can tuned mach 1. People really seem to underestimate these cars. The 4.6 with a high compression ratio like the ls1s will run. Ford's mistake with the 2v and 3v were designing them for 87 octane. Mach 1 vs. f-body is always going to be a driver's race from everything I've seen personally.
Nobody is arguing that.... You were 100% wrong saying the mach had the edge. Stock or modded.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:21 PM
  #286  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OMGLS1
I love how we're comparing a brand new GT to a nearly 10 year old f-body.
I love how a brand new Camaro still can't hang with a nearly 10 year old Mustang.
Black Snake Blown is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:22 PM
  #287  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black Snake Blown
I love how a brand new Camaro still can't hang with a nearly 10 year old Mustang.
Can't hang? Since when is a 111-112mph trapping car destroying a 110mph trapping car?

Who gives a **** what year it was made, how it makes its power, how much it weighs, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc..... All it matters is what it runs.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:23 PM
  #288  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Can't hang? Since when is a 111-112mph trapping car destroying a 110mph trapping car?

Who gives a **** what year it was made, how it makes its power, how much it weighs, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc..... All it matters is what it runs.
And Cobras run faster than Camaros.
Black Snake Blown is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:24 PM
  #289  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you want to play that game.. Just compare the Zr1 to the Ford GT.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:24 PM
  #290  
Teching In
 
9cobra4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OMGLS1
I love how we're comparing a brand new GT to a nearly 10 year old f-body.
Case in point.
9cobra4 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:25 PM
  #291  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black Snake Blown
And Cobras run faster than Camaros.
Wow, thanks for informing me... If you can't follow me, quit posting.

The 111-112mph car I was referring to was a Cobra.. The 110mph car is an ls3 Camaro.

Keep up if you don't mind, makes it easier on me.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:28 PM
  #292  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Wow, thanks for informing me... If you can't follow me, quit posting.

The 111-112mph car I was referring to was a Cobra.. The 110mph car is an ls3 Camaro.

Keep up if you don't mind, makes it easier on me.
I just thought I'd point out that we've been waiting nearly a decade for Chevy to come up with an answer. They haven't yet.
Black Snake Blown is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:47 PM
  #293  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black Snake Blown
I just thought I'd point out that we've been waiting nearly a decade for Chevy to come up with an answer. They haven't yet.
Answer to what? The Cobra? I didn't know they needed to try to compete with a car that was made in 2003-4...?

Last I checked GM sold more 2010 SS last year than Ford sold 2003-4 Cobras.

IMO GM isn't really concerned about the Mustang/Camaro rivalry. The Z28 and Corvette is where they are focusing... Why should they? The Camaro is selling, and good.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:47 PM
  #294  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
How can you say 05-10 runs mid-high 13s and then go on to say that 99-04 run high 13s?
Because I said the 05-10 runs 13.5s to 13.9s. The 99-04s ran 13.9 to 14.3

Considering the S197 was only 40more HP and weighed somewhat more, how is that really hard to believe?

You can't give the exact average for one platform... Slightly better than average for another... And slightly under the average for another.
I didn't do that.
If the FASTEST you have seen is a 13.7.. Why would you put a baseline at 13.9?
I said the fastest I'VE SEEN.
Whether we like it or not.. When talking AVERAGE
Then in that case, the average LS1 Fbody owner runs 14s. Do we want to really go there?
Put it this way..... Fastest 05+ you have seen run is a 13.3... Fastest 04- you have seen is 13.7. That is .4 slower... Meaning if the 05+ is running mid-high 13s, how is the 04- running high 13s on average? You are giving a true average for one and above average for another.
I didn't say fastest RAN. I said fastest I'VE PERSONALLY SEEN. I am pretty sure someone has gotten faster than a 13.3 in a stock S197. Probably not by much.
Ke^in is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:48 PM
  #295  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Nobody is arguing that.... You were 100% wrong saying the mach had the edge. Stock or modded.
He's right about this. It's a drivers race, but the Fbody DOES have the edge. I mean it does have more displacement.
Ke^in is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:51 PM
  #296  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BTW Chevy doesn't have to do anything to compete with anything. Both Ford and Chevy don't exactly have similar platform ranges other than the basic pony cars.
Ke^in is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:57 PM
  #297  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Answer to what? The Cobra? I didn't know they needed to try to compete with a car that was made in 2003-4...?

Last I checked GM sold more 2010 SS last year than Ford sold 2003-4 Cobras.

IMO GM isn't really concerned about the Mustang/Camaro rivalry. The Z28 and Corvette is where they are focusing... Why should they? The Camaro is selling, and good.
More like Chevy produced more Camaros than Ford did of the 03-04 Cobra. And the 2011 Mustang is already selling better. That has always been a trend between the Mustang and Camaro. Mustangs have consistently sold better than Camaros since the 60s. Being faster is just a bonus now. It will be interesting to see how much longer Chevy can continue production before throwing in the towel yet again.
Black Snake Blown is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 05:57 PM
  #298  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
I said the fastest I'VE SEEN.

Then in that case, the average LS1 Fbody owner runs 14s. Do we want to really go there?

I didn't say fastest RAN. I said fastest I'VE PERSONALLY SEEN. I am pretty sure someone has gotten faster than a 13.3 in a stock S197. Probably not by much.
I said "You have seen" at least 3 times in my post. I understand that.

Average fbody runs 14s? Then can we agree that the average 99 GT runs high 14s/low 15s. I will agree to that if you can agree to that. At least that is an accurate gap between the two ON AVERAGE.

Come on man..... Hopefully one day you will understand what I am saying. This is the only time I have seen you be so stubborn about something, you won't even try to see my point. If you saw it, you would agree. I have zero doubt about that. It bothers me so much with you because I know you are more intelligent than the majority of people on here and can actually comprehend what I am saying, you just don't want to for some reason.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:01 PM
  #299  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black Snake Blown
More like Chevy produced more Camaros than Ford did of the 03-04 Cobra. And the 2011 Mustang is already selling better. That has always been a trend between the Mustang and Camaro. Mustangs have consistently sold better than Camaros since the 60s. Being faster is just a bonus now. It will be interesting to see how much longer Chevy can continue production before throwing in the towel yet again.
Are you stupid?

How can they sell 03-04 Cobras in 2010, regardless of how many of either were made?

Did you not pay attention to the numbers of the 2010 GT/Camaro sales?
lemons12 is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:04 PM
  #300  
Teching In
 
Black Snake Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Are you stupid?

How can they sell 03-04 Cobras in 2010, regardless of how many of either were made?

Did you not pay attention to the numbers of the 2010 GT/Camaro sales?
You are literally the worst poster on this board. Do you know the difference between present and past tenses? I'm really not trying to stereotype , but you certainly aren't helping. I fear you are under the false impression that randomly insulting others will somehow convince people that you have a legitimate argument. Maybe you should sit back from the computer for a minute and just calm down. I have an appreciation for all quick cars, but it is people like you that have steered me away from owning an f-body. What people like you don't understand is that flat out denying the existence of better and faster cars just makes people look down on Camaro owners as a whole and in turn you're hurting the brand you seem to care for so very much.

Last edited by Black Snake Blown; 08-03-2010 at 06:09 PM.
Black Snake Blown is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.