Gto killed
09-28-2010, 02:04 AM
#361
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the manufacturer knows what parameters the supercharger can operate within. it's not like we are talking about putting an m45 on a 4.6l dohc engine.
if evidence pointed to the ability to generate 400rwhp (also depending on my goals and budget) and the manufacturer didn't specify any issues otherwise. Just because there is a larger/better option doesn't necessarily make it the more economical or smarter choice.
just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should/or have to in order to reach your goals.
if evidence pointed to the ability to generate 400rwhp (also depending on my goals and budget) and the manufacturer didn't specify any issues otherwise. Just because there is a larger/better option doesn't necessarily make it the more economical or smarter choice.
just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should/or have to in order to reach your goals.
I'm sure they don't. But the M90 was originally designed as a V6 blower. I think one of the first applications was on the Thunderbird S/C back in the early-mid 90s. I think it was also used on the supercharged Grand Prix/Bonneville/Regal. The M112 ('03-'04 Cobra) is the one you really want to use for a V8.
09-28-2010, 02:14 AM
#362
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
exactly what im trying to say. why not put the most efficient choice on? just because you are happy with 400 hp for now doesnt mean you wont want 500 or 600 later, you go with the bigger blower and get to your goal, then in 6 months when you want more you wont have to go buy another blower to get to your new goal.waste of time and money, and if your on a budget that just means you have to save some more pennies, it will be well worth the wait to not half *** it
09-28-2010, 02:32 AM
#363
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, enough people bitch about putting a P1SC on a car instead of a D1SC... if I had another Mustang GT (which I wouldn't buy again, unless it was a new 5.0) and I wanted to supercharge it it would definitely not get an M90, just in case I wanted to run better than mid 12s at some point.
09-28-2010, 02:59 AM
#364
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im no supercharger expert or anything, but arent there a ton of variables that could change those charts? i.e. engine displacement, cfm output and what not? i would assume trying to run a supercharger that was designed for a v6 on a v8 would be like trying to run a turbo from a diesel pickup on a semi... sure you can get the boost psi you need, but its not going to actually flow as much air as the semi turbo would.and i know if you tried to run the smaller turbo it would generate more heat due to the fact it was working so hard to produce the amount of air the motor needs. but hey... what would i know? ill just take my sunfire and throw on some naaaaas and make lambos look slow
Last edited by Ju1ce; 09-28-2010 at 03:07 AM.
09-28-2010, 03:00 AM
#365
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, enough people bitch about putting a P1SC on a car instead of a D1SC... if I had another Mustang GT (which I wouldn't buy again, unless it was a new 5.0) and I wanted to supercharge it it would definitely not get an M90, just in case I wanted to run better than mid 12s at some point.
09-28-2010, 03:08 AM
#367
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't find it right now, but there was a big write up on the GenV M90 vs the M112 blower. A guy maxed out both of his setups with each blower and found them to be within 30whp of eachother.
Last edited by Ju1ce; 09-28-2010 at 03:18 AM.
09-28-2010, 04:01 AM
#369
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-28-2010, 11:45 AM
#376
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-28-2010, 09:50 PM
#378
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville / Indianapolis
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
im no supercharger expert or anything, but arent there a ton of variables that could change those charts? i.e. engine displacement, cfm output and what not? i would assume trying to run a supercharger that was designed for a v6 on a v8 would be like trying to run a turbo from a diesel pickup on a semi... sure you can get the boost psi you need, but its not going to actually flow as much air as the semi turbo would.and i know if you tried to run the smaller turbo it would generate more heat due to the fact it was working so hard to produce the amount of air the motor needs. but hey... what would i know? ill just take my sunfire and throw on some naaaaas and make lambos look slow
I'm sure they don't. But the M90 was originally designed as a V6 blower. I think one of the first applications was on the Thunderbird S/C back in the early-mid 90s. I think it was also used on the supercharged Grand Prix/Bonneville/Regal. The M112 ('03-'04 Cobra) is the one you really want to use for a V8.
I'm done arguing with you because it's like talking to a retarded junkie teenager.
09-28-2010, 11:52 PM
#379
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no he is trying to say he banged his mom.
You're so intelligent. See below
^^^ THIS. The M90 will create a lot of heat at the same boost as the M112 because of the little blower is working harder to compress the same amount of air therefor making it less efficient.
I'm done arguing with you because it's like talking to a retarded junkie teenager.
^^^ THIS. The M90 will create a lot of heat at the same boost as the M112 because of the little blower is working harder to compress the same amount of air therefor making it less efficient.
I'm done arguing with you because it's like talking to a retarded junkie teenager.
better to just give up before we lose our minds.
09-29-2010, 12:53 AM
#380
