BS- movie quote thread
10-14-2010, 04:43 PM
#162
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Can you tell me what would the corect ignition timing be on a 1955 Bel Air Chevrolet with a 327 cubic inch engine and a 4bbl carborator?
That's a bullshit question.
Does that mean that you can't answer it?
It's a bullshit question. It's impossible to answer.
Impossible because you don't know the answer!
Nobody could answer that question!
Your honor, I move to disqualify Miss Vito as an expert witness.
Can you answer the question?
No, it is a trick question!
Why is it a trick question?
Because Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55, the 327 didn't come out till '62 and it wasn't offered in the Bel air with a 4bbl carb till '64. However, in 1964 the correct ignition timing would be 4 degrees before top dead center.
well, uh.....she's acceptible your honor.
That's a bullshit question.
Does that mean that you can't answer it?
It's a bullshit question. It's impossible to answer.
Impossible because you don't know the answer!
Nobody could answer that question!
Your honor, I move to disqualify Miss Vito as an expert witness.
Can you answer the question?
No, it is a trick question!
Why is it a trick question?
Because Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55, the 327 didn't come out till '62 and it wasn't offered in the Bel air with a 4bbl carb till '64. However, in 1964 the correct ignition timing would be 4 degrees before top dead center.
well, uh.....she's acceptible your honor.
10-14-2010, 05:30 PM
#163
Yall are friggin awesome!
10-14-2010, 06:04 PM
#164
Soooooooooooooo, today I drove a Mustang. 2 actually, the burnout marks you see are from an auto stock Mach 1 I drove. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOQbe_YOiQE
2008 Bullitt, 5 speed- Corsa axle back, BBk TB, CAI, Crager 20" wheels.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOQbe_YOiQE
2008 Bullitt, 5 speed- Corsa axle back, BBk TB, CAI, Crager 20" wheels.
10-14-2010, 06:14 PM
#165
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: maple valley, wa
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Soooooooooooooo, today I drove a Mustang. 2 actually, the burnout marks you see are from an auto stock Mach 1 I drove.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOQbe_YOiQE
2008 Bullitt, 5 speed- Corsa axle back, BBk TB, CAI, Crager 20" wheels.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOQbe_YOiQE
2008 Bullitt, 5 speed- Corsa axle back, BBk TB, CAI, Crager 20" wheels.
I would love to have a Mach 1 for a DD.
10-14-2010, 06:39 PM
#169
. I can do a couple quick reviews.Mach 1
auto, yellow, bone stock. ~50k miles.
Ride was somewhat bouncy on rougher roads, transmission didn't like shifting at high rpms. With TC on, it would spin the 1-2 shift. With TC off, the back stepped out very hard. Stock exhaust was super quiet, interior looks nicer than my Camaro's but I absolutely hate everything about it. Seats were decent though. Power felt lazy comin in. Didn't feel out of breathe like a stock LT1 at high rpms, but pulls nothing like an LS1 up top. Does huge smokey burnouts though
Forgot to add, I think I'd get one as a DD if it was a manual, but I'd have to have exhaust.2008 Bullitt
5 speed, hurst short throw, Corsa axle back, BBK tb, CAI. 20" Cragers (255's) 8000 miles
Car looks great, rides pretty nice. Loved the interior, seats very very ncie too. Shifter felt wayyy too mechanical and clunky. CLutch engagement way too high for my liking. Power felt like it came in a little better in than the Mach, but didn't feel like it hit very hard. Very smooth, even from a 4500 roll in 2nd gear, which I don't like. I want a hard hit. Too much sound deadening
Corsa sounded sick otuside, but was wayyy too quiet inside. I revved at every one I saw I'd consider one for a DD though, with an X pipe though.I realize the auto Mach's are a good deal slower than the manual's (or that's what I've heard), and that the 20's could keep the gearing down in the Bullitt. I just took the cars for what they were.
10-14-2010, 06:42 PM
#170
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-14-2010, 06:45 PM
#171
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: maple valley, wa
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On facebook, I'm acting like I bought it. Made it my profile pciture and people don't like it . I can do a couple quick reviews.
Mach 1
auto, yellow, bone stock. ~50k miles.
Ride was somewhat bouncy on rougher roads, transmission didn't like shifting at high rpms. With TC on, it would spin the 1-2 shift. With TC off, the back stepped out very hard. Stock exhaust was super quiet, interior looks nicer than my Camaro's but I absolutely hate everything about it. Seats were decent though. Power felt lazy comin in. Didn't feel out of breathe like a stock LT1 at high rpms, but pulls nothing like an LS1 up top. Does huge smokey burnouts though
2008 Bullitt
5 speed, hurst short throw, Corsa axle back, BBK tb, CAI. 20" Cragers (255's) 8000 miles
Car looks great, rides pretty nice. Loved the interior, seats very very ncie too. Shifter felt wayyy too mechanical and clunky. CLutch engagement way too high for my liking. Power felt like it came in a little better in than the Mach, but didn't feel like it hit very hard. Very smooth, even from a 4500 roll in 2nd gear, which I don't like. I want a hard hit. Too much sound deadening Corsa sounded sick otuside, but was wayyy too quiet inside. I revved at every one I saw I'd consider one for a DD though, with an X pipe though.
I realize the auto Mach's are a good deal slower than the manual's (or that's what I've heard), and that the 20's could keep the gearing down in the Bullitt. I just took the cars for what they were.
. I can do a couple quick reviews.Mach 1
auto, yellow, bone stock. ~50k miles.
Ride was somewhat bouncy on rougher roads, transmission didn't like shifting at high rpms. With TC on, it would spin the 1-2 shift. With TC off, the back stepped out very hard. Stock exhaust was super quiet, interior looks nicer than my Camaro's but I absolutely hate everything about it. Seats were decent though. Power felt lazy comin in. Didn't feel out of breathe like a stock LT1 at high rpms, but pulls nothing like an LS1 up top. Does huge smokey burnouts though
2008 Bullitt
5 speed, hurst short throw, Corsa axle back, BBK tb, CAI. 20" Cragers (255's) 8000 miles
Car looks great, rides pretty nice. Loved the interior, seats very very ncie too. Shifter felt wayyy too mechanical and clunky. CLutch engagement way too high for my liking. Power felt like it came in a little better in than the Mach, but didn't feel like it hit very hard. Very smooth, even from a 4500 roll in 2nd gear, which I don't like. I want a hard hit. Too much sound deadening
Corsa sounded sick otuside, but was wayyy too quiet inside. I revved at every one I saw I'd consider one for a DD though, with an X pipe though.I realize the auto Mach's are a good deal slower than the manual's (or that's what I've heard), and that the 20's could keep the gearing down in the Bullitt. I just took the cars for what they were.
10-14-2010, 07:29 PM
#175
10-14-2010, 07:39 PM
#177
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
another good one from that movie.
Is it possible, the 2 utes...
2 what? what was that word?
what word?
2 what? did you say utes?
yeah 2 utes.
what is a ute?
excuse me your honor, 2 youths.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eIZuSMRdgk
incidently, Ralph Macchio was 31 when this movie was made, he was hardly a "ute"
Last edited by 1995blacktattop; 10-14-2010 at 07:45 PM.
10-14-2010, 07:41 PM
#178
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Sean, I am surprised you hate the interior of the Mach. The first time I sat in my dad's Camaro, besides the seat position which I like, the interior made me want to vomit. I guess differences, though, are what makes the world go round 
I would agree that stock for stock, LS1's definitely "feel" a lot faster than the Machs, even though they are closer than they feel. The autos on those have cast cranks while the manuals have forged, because of this the redline on autos is 5800 and the manual 6800, Ford did this (redline) as insurance for the weaker crank and the internals of the auto tranny weren't designed to spin nearly as freely as the guts of the T-3650. From the factory, both come with 3.55s. Other than the crank, they are identical engines with the same compression.
I would agree that stock for stock, LS1's definitely "feel" a lot faster than the Machs, even though they are closer than they feel. The autos on those have cast cranks while the manuals have forged, because of this the redline on autos is 5800 and the manual 6800, Ford did this (redline) as insurance for the weaker crank and the internals of the auto tranny weren't designed to spin nearly as freely as the guts of the T-3650. From the factory, both come with 3.55s. Other than the crank, they are identical engines with the same compression.
10-14-2010, 07:44 PM
#179
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: maple valley, wa
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sean, I am surprised you hate the interior of the Mach. The first time I sat in my dad's Camaro, besides the seat position which I like, the interior made me want to vomit. I guess differences, though, are what makes the world go round I would agree that stock for stock, LS1's definitely "feel" a lot faster than the Machs, even though they are closer than they feel. The autos on those have cast cranks while the manuals have forged, because of this the redline on autos is 5800 and the manual 6800, Ford did this (redline) as insurance for the weaker crank and the internals of the auto tranny weren't designed to spin nearly as freely as the guts of the T-3650. From the factory, both come with 3.55s. Other than the crank, they are identical engines with the same compression.
I would agree that stock for stock, LS1's definitely "feel" a lot faster than the Machs, even though they are closer than they feel. The autos on those have cast cranks while the manuals have forged, because of this the redline on autos is 5800 and the manual 6800, Ford did this (redline) as insurance for the weaker crank and the internals of the auto tranny weren't designed to spin nearly as freely as the guts of the T-3650. From the factory, both come with 3.55s. Other than the crank, they are identical engines with the same compression.
10-14-2010, 07:47 PM
#180
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
I know...with the same driver they say the quarter mile difference is like a half a second. Compare that to a 98 Z28 where the difference is 1 to 2 tenths (average driver).