Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Stock WS6 vs Brand new 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2011, 09:30 AM
  #141  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mach Boy
The only thing that Ford seemed to do right on the 4.6 4Vs are the heads. The cams and intake are **** poor options and cost a lot of money to upgrade and that's why so many people strap a blower on. Well I take that back the 96-98 Cobra cams were good but the heads sucked those years. With 96-98 Cobra cam swap on a Mach 1 you can see 320-340rwhp with just that and some exhaust/tune.

By the time you've upgraded the cams you've spent $1600+ not including labor and the only intake that seems to produce reliable numbers is the FR500. Good luck getting that for under $1500. For that you could have a supercharger kit and produce a lot more HP than the N/A option (On3 Turbo kits aren't far from that number either). So it's not that the 4.6 can't make power N/A it's just that it is so much cheaper to go another route.
I remember the Mach1 vs. LS1 full bolt-ons races, the Mach1's got left behind when they had to pay extensive labor(drop the k-member) to swap in some long tubes headers to make 310rwhp while the LS1's where making 360rwhp with similar mods. I'll admit a Mach1 w/ a Borla exhaust (no cats) is the best sounding V8 I have ever heard!!!!

The Mach1 owners ended up giving up and buying Termis.

Originally Posted by automach1
I have no reason to post I came on ls1 tech to defend myself awhile back and stayed to learn a little about the lsx so I am not so narrow-minded like yourself.

I guess this 4.6 is junk too right I do not see a stock cubed ls3 doing that anytime soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86uLw...layer_embedded
Really? I might as well start arguing that TPI engines are worthy contenders as well
Old 05-10-2011, 09:34 AM
  #142  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake95
No ****, man! That would be wicked.
This summer, I am going to be much more free than last summer (besides working on the Rustang ) So get a hold of me the second you need a camera man or someone to be a second opinion on some turd you check out before you buy
Will do man.

I am actually about to buy a whole bunch of **** on here from another member. Gotta meet him up in Joliet on Thursday though, but I should be able to make a decent amount on this stuff, especially if I find some local geniuses on CL. Trying to make a little extra cash so I can jump on an LS3 the minute I find one. Maybe instead of making extra then buying more stuff and repeating, I'll just go to the casino.

Shameless plug: If anyone needs a H/C/I setup, let me know.
-stock 799 heads with stock valves and VS--assembled
-Patriot stage 2 heads, 2.02/1.57 with Gold springs (.650" lift)--assembled
-FAST 90mm manifold, 92mm throttlebody
-torquer 2 cam
-36lb injectors

Last edited by WSsick; 05-10-2011 at 09:40 AM.
Old 05-10-2011, 09:36 AM
  #143  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,624
Received 68 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

OOO Pm me if you get that Fast please!!!
Old 05-10-2011, 09:38 AM
  #144  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
OOO Pm me if you get that Fast please!!!
PM me.

I should have it all Thursday, maybe tomorrow.
Old 05-10-2011, 11:30 AM
  #145  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
RikkiTorment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
I guess this 4.6 is junk too right I do not see a stock cubed ls3 doing that anytime soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86uLw...layer_embedded
Factory cubes?
Old 05-10-2011, 12:39 PM
  #146  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think he means that Mihovitz did that 6.19 run with only 281 cubes..He also did it using an OEM production block, heads, and hydraulic lifters.

-Mark
Old 05-10-2011, 11:57 PM
  #147  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
RikkiTorment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bitemark46
I think he means that Mihovitz did that 6.19 run with only 281 cubes..He also did it using an OEM production block, heads, and hydraulic lifters.

-Mark
My point is he's going to compare a pro-stock dragster with a TON of money invested in it to a street car. He's basically implying that anybody with a 4.6 can run 6-second quarter miles.
Old 05-11-2011, 09:25 PM
  #148  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No, he's saying that claiming that an engine that has gone 6s on stock block/heads sucks is retarded.
Old 05-11-2011, 10:33 PM
  #149  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,511
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
No, he's saying that claiming that an engine that has gone 6s on stock block/heads sucks is retarded.
99.9999999999999% of them suck. Obviously due to $$$ that engine does not suck.
Old 05-11-2011, 10:40 PM
  #150  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
RikkiTorment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
99.9999999999999% of them suck. Obviously due to $$$ that engine does not suck.
Exactly. Anything with enough boost, and money into it can be fast. Don't they tear down and rebuild these engines between runs anyways?
Old 05-11-2011, 10:46 PM
  #151  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,511
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RikkiTorment
Exactly. Anything with enough boost, and money into it can be fast. Don't they tear down and rebuild these engines between runs anyways?
He also makes it like it ran that in a regular joe blow chassis.

With turbos as big as that car has, cubes pretty much go out the window.


What the fastest all motor stock cubed 4.6? Thats what I want to be dazzled with.
Old 05-12-2011, 03:21 AM
  #152  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RikkiTorment
Exactly. Anything with enough boost, and money into it can be fast. Don't they tear down and rebuild these engines between runs anyways?

I saw a post on another board by one of the crew members; they turn that motor 9600 rpms and tear it down every 100 passes.
Old 05-12-2011, 07:41 AM
  #153  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
99.9999999999999% of them suck. Obviously due to $$$ that engine does not suck.
Seeing as how there its a guy in this thread that has a bolt on 4.6 that would drag anything you own.... What are the chances that .00000000000001 owner would be in here!?
Old 05-12-2011, 07:44 AM
  #154  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
He also makes it like it ran that in a regular joe blow chassis.

With turbos as big as that car has, cubes pretty much go out the window.


What the fastest all motor stock cubed 4.6? Thats what I want to be dazzled with.
You GM guys sure as hell put alot of rules down when you compare the modular Fords.
Old 05-12-2011, 08:23 AM
  #155  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,511
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Seeing as how there its a guy in this thread that has a bolt on 4.6 that would drag anything you own.... What are the chances that .00000000000001 owner would be in here!?
Awww how cute talking **** with someones elses car.
Old 05-12-2011, 08:55 AM
  #156  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
He also makes it like it ran that in a regular joe blow chassis.

With turbos as big as that car has, cubes pretty much go out the window.


What the fastest all motor stock cubed 4.6? Thats what I want to be dazzled with.
For a 2v I believe it went 9.9X with a class spec'd motor. For a 4v on stock cubes I don't know. But I'd probably have to say if a 2v went high 9's then probably 9.50's. Now that is with 281 cubes. There are 2 n/a 5.4's that went 9.28 and 9.20 on motor. A better comparison to the ls1 (closer comparison to cubes....347 vs 330).

If your'e not impressived with a tube chassis car fine. But you also have to realize that in that class Mihovitz is up against motors that are sometimes twice as big (some of them chevy motors).

Fastest non tube chassis car is Mark Luton of MMR just went 6.99@205 at 3200. 5.4 4v. Is that better?

Fastest n/a SI 4.6 is about 4 tenths off from the fastest LS1. But I'm sure with the new 5.0 that will change once that engine gets older. If my shitbox didn't have the worst 4v heads ever made for a 4.6 and if it had the mach1 heads I'm sure I'd be low 11's. But I'll continue to work with whats I gots.

-Mark
Old 05-12-2011, 12:04 PM
  #157  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
He also makes it like it ran that in a regular joe blow chassis.

With turbos as big as that car has, cubes pretty much go out the window.


What the fastest all motor stock cubed 4.6? Thats what I want to be dazzled with.
you dont say much i agree with, but the turbo comment is right. john is using the biggest turbos possible for the backpressure he generates. there is only so much pressure ratio/turbine back pressure one can utilize before aire will flow no more. his power is not because he has exotic materials, or massive expendature on each and every engine. he uses stock block that is filled, stock crank that is prepped, stock heads with a mild port job. stock size exhaust valves, etc.

those heads LOVe 10,000 rpm and big boost. same heads bitemark is using, and i use on my little 74mm turbo 4v.
Old 05-12-2011, 12:07 PM
  #158  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Exactly why I am always on the hunt for an LS3 long/short block to throw in a lightened 4th gen.




(then I can smash your new cam setup with another bolt-on car )
the gto guys with their LS2's are loving the cheap l92 swap. 450-475rwhp.
Old 05-12-2011, 12:21 PM
  #159  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
jetaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Theres no point in trying to match cubes when they are 2 completely different motors. If you want to match cubes then you have to take away 3 cams
Old 05-12-2011, 01:01 PM
  #160  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jetaws6
Theres no point in trying to match cubes when they are 2 completely different motors. If you want to match cubes then you have to take away 3 cams
agreed or take away cubes and allow 4 cams. Everything is relative. There is no "right" way to make power. They all work.


Quick Reply: Stock WS6 vs Brand new 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.