When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Lol @ Mac!! What's funny is that he is so delusional & stubborn that he truly thinks he's heard the phrase "load and behold." LMFAO!
Dude it's like this for several things. Instead of being a man and admitting he's wrong, he tried to cop out by saying he was calling someone a Pokemon before when he called them a Primeape instead of primate. He won't just admit it and say "whoops my bad".
Dude it's like this for several things. Instead of being a man and admitting he's wrong, he tried to cop out by saying he was calling someone a Pokemon before when he called them a Primeape instead of primate. He won't just admit it and say "whoops my bad".
I believe I was just coming around when that "Pokemon" situation happened hahaha. I've noticed these things too. It's quite ridiculous actually.
Dude it's like this for several things. Instead of being a man and admitting he's wrong, he tried to cop out by saying he was calling someone a Pokemon before when he called them a Primeape instead of primate. He won't just admit it and say "whoops my bad".
I know plenty. I also know that when hio doubted it he went to confirm it. Yet all evidence leads to it being right. Again stop tryn to put down other cars. You must be real jelly of his car. I guess id be jelly to if my 10s FI gt500 was in the same 10s range as a bolt on ls6.
Mac, a car that has the power to go a mid 1.20s is going to be going well into the 5s in the 1/8th
Ooooo, me too. I beat a car that traps over 800mph. Here is the proof. No doubt a hero run but was able to confirm that the other guys slip said 831mph
For anyone who doesn't know jack ******* **** about drag racing, Mac, Cobranotch etc. This is just a calculator and just an estimate but it gives you an idea of how much of a ******* difference it is.
Ooooo, me too. I beat a car that traps over 800mph. Here is the proof. No doubt a hero run but was able to confirm that the other guys slip said 831mph
Nice!! I've seen some guys backhalf in the 600s but that guy was able to pull off a 748mph back half! Seems legit if the other guy's slip said it, too.
For anyone who doesn't know jack ******* **** about drag racing, Mac, Cobranotch etc. This is just a calculator and just an estimate but it gives you an idea of how much of a ******* difference it is.
There's your proof Mac.
Ricer math isnt proof you ford fans saying it cant happen isnt proof show me an article from hot rod magazine or some GM tech website that says his 60' is physically impossible. Keep in mind nothing is impossible, its highly improbable. Which means there is always a chance. I fully understand the machines make mistakes. Anything that's made by a human has a flaw percentage. Could his 60' be the case yes could it also be the truth yes. Fact is the guy in the tt 5.p said hio treed him, notch said the same thing, hio said the same thing. Which leads us to believe that 60' is more convincing. Like i said it could be a hero run. But until there is irrefutable evidence that his 60' was a mistake then there should be no reason not to believe it. Its that simple.
Ricer math isnt proof you ford fans saying it cant happen isnt proof show me an article from hot rod magazine or some GM tech website that says his 60' is physically impossible. Keep in mind nothing is impossible, its highly improbable. Which means there is always a chance. I fully understand the machines make mistakes. Anything that's made by a human has a flaw percentage. Could his 60' be the case yes could it also be the truth yes. Fact is the guy in the tt 5.p said hio treed him, notch said the same thing, hio said the same thing. Which leads us to believe that 60' is more convincing. Like i said it could be a hero run. But until there is irrefutable evidence that his 60' was a mistake then there should be no reason not to believe it. Its that simple.
I could careless their OPINIONS aren't facts like they claim. No proof has been given to counter the 1.2 either. Like i said the tt 5.0 should come on here to help set it straight.
No it couldn't be the truth, the calculator says 400 hp difference, clearly there's a margin of error in there but you honestly think that calculator is meant to estimate your horsepower, give or take 500 or so? Lmao.
I could careless their OPINIONS aren't facts like they claim. No proof has been given to counter the 1.2 either. Like i said the tt 5.0 should come on here to help set it straight.
If he went from a 1.6 to 1.2 his overall et would have been more like a 10.2 not a 10.7. Every .1 in 60ft is usually good for twice that at the end. It doesn't make since and you would know if you pulled a 1.2 60ft.
No it couldn't be the truth, the calculator says 400 hp difference, clearly there's a margin of error in there but you honestly think that calculator is meant to estimate your horsepower, give or take 500 or so? Lmao.
No it would be much less however they arent accurate. Its for an estimate
If he went from a 1.6 to 1.2 his overall et would have been more like a 10.2 not a 10.7. Every .1 in 60ft is usually good for twice that at the end. It doesn't make since and you would know if you pulled a 1.2 60ft.
Hio said he ran out hard. He also said he treed the guy doing 1.4. All im saying is don't count it out until there is real proof. He probably actually in all honesty did a mid 1.3 but who knows.
When was the last time that machine has been calibrated? Or even serviced? That would be a good indication to help either argument.
11-09-2014, 02:18 PM
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
