Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

06 GTO vs 392 hemi challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2011, 03:47 PM
  #341  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
So now you agree? I knew you'd realize eventually.
I said before it was a drivers race. I didn't agree with the 392 all running low 12's. Hell not all 5's run low 12's. Not all SS run 12.5. 392/5.0 mid 12's on average. With some higher ups cause different things like high DA's, bad track prep, poor drivers. Camaro high 12's average.


Now do we want to discuss the Boss?
Old 08-13-2011, 05:01 PM
  #342  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
You sure about that?




hmm...
Yes I am..

I said how it run close to the 5.0/ss. They both have went 8's. What new challenger has?

I said the 5.0 also leads everything right now. Bolt on times, blower times. And my bad can't say C/H/I times cause no one has pushed the 5.0 that way. But the fastest bolt on 5.0 has beat the fastest C/H/I SS. Hennessey did bolt ons on a 392. BUt show no track times for it. Just a dyno.

The GT00 has went low 11's with just a tire swap. Yep still no 392/SS has. Best bet will be the ZL1. BUt then the GT500 gets a bump in power next year to over 600hp. Rumor is a 392SC package will be out from Dodge making 570hp.

The 5.0 has went 12.2 vs 12.3. Yep technically speaking the 5.0 is faster stock to stock. Best times compared.

And yes the Chally will need more then bolt ons ro just a stall/tune in the end to run with the SS/5.0. As mention they have shown they can go 8's. Even though the SS didn't do the 8's or low 9 it has with a LS3. 1 was a 427 and other was a LS9.
Old 08-13-2011, 05:19 PM
  #343  
TECH Regular
 
AWDTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 916 BREDWNR
I think I know which one you're talking about. Can't recall if he was running that night tho. I know there was a couple 5.0's in the high 12's.
sounds about right, never heard of a stock one around going any faster then that. the blue one is always at infineon really old guy, hes a cool dude
Old 08-13-2011, 06:10 PM
  #344  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
chaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Youre all bitches! Wait till I get my new Aventador...
Old 08-13-2011, 10:12 PM
  #345  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I still dont believe the 12.3 run from a bone stock auto 5.0, no way anyone is going to change my mind without a video sorry. If that car had anywhere near a 12.3 in it there would be at least 3-4 other guys that could replicate it in the same conditions.
Old 08-14-2011, 02:44 AM
  #346  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
I still dont believe the 12.3 run from a bone stock auto 5.0, no way anyone is going to change my mind without a video sorry. If that car had anywhere near a 12.3 in it there would be at least 3-4 other guys that could replicate it in the same conditions.
Guy went 12.37, there has been a few others go 12.4 at the same track in same conditions. PLus a few other guys go 12.4/12.5 in similar weather.

Also if there was a video how would we know nothing is done to the car? That can be said for every video there is.
Old 08-14-2011, 04:52 PM
  #347  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
I still dont believe the 12.3 run from a bone stock auto 5.0, no way anyone is going to change my mind without a video sorry. If that car had anywhere near a 12.3 in it there would be at least 3-4 other guys that could replicate it in the same conditions.
1) Why would a video do more to convince you? You would still say "Well how do we know it was stock?"
2) The A6 in the Mustang is so close in performance to the 6spd manual that it's ridiculous. It's not like we're comparing an A4/M6 F-body.
Originally Posted by ohioborn80
Guy went 12.37, there has been a few others go 12.4 at the same track in same conditions. PLus a few other guys go 12.4/12.5 in similar weather.

Also if there was a video how would we know nothing is done to the car? That can be said for every video there is.
Old 08-14-2011, 05:08 PM
  #348  
9 Second Club
 
UBoysPlayBall?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
1) Why would a video do more to convince you? You would still say "Well how do we know it was stock?"
2) The A6 in the Mustang is so close in performance to the 6spd manual that it's ridiculous. It's not like we're comparing an A4/M6 F-body.


From what ive seen at both local tracks and heard from owners themselves, there is about a .2-3/2-3mph difference between the A6 and 6M with both cars being driven to their fullest potential, roughly the same gap between an LS1 A4 vs M6.
Old 08-14-2011, 05:16 PM
  #349  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There is a mph difference partly because of the inherent power difference between an automatic and manual transmission. But from a dig, they are real close. But unlike the A4/M6 F-body comparison where consistency is most of the reason the two are so close, the gear ratios in the A6 are spaced more evenly (similar to the M6), and the ratios are closer (also similar to the M6). Of course both of them are LIGHT YEARS ahead of the old AOD/AOD-E/4R70-W transmissions that used to come in Mustangs.
Old 08-14-2011, 05:42 PM
  #350  
9 Second Club
 
UBoysPlayBall?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 6-speed guys can launch harder. That's where the advantage is at. If a guy can hook a high rpm dump on street rubber, he'll get those 60 fts that a stock-stall car just can't match. Typical times on a good night here is 12.7-12.9 for 6M and 12.9-13.1 for the A6 guys. I heard a stall really wakes those A6's up tho.
Old 08-14-2011, 06:34 PM
  #351  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UBoysPlayBall?
The 6-speed guys can launch harder. That's where the advantage is at. If a guy can hook a high rpm dump on street rubber, he'll get those 60 fts that a stock-stall car just can't match. Typical times on a good night here is 12.7-12.9 for 6M and 12.9-13.1 for the A6 guys. I heard a stall really wakes those A6's up tho.
my point exactly for 1 guy to get a 12.3 in a bone stock A6 dosent add up. Im willing to bet he had DR's and some kind of tune

Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 08-14-2011 at 06:45 PM.
Old 08-14-2011, 08:13 PM
  #352  
Banned
 
Paywithdeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albany NY
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You realize the difference of 12.3/12.7 is literally about a ******* foot. If that. Look at mph's for the whos faster.
Old 08-14-2011, 11:23 PM
  #353  
11 Second Club
 
LT/LS Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paywithdeath
You realize the difference of 12.3/12.7 is literally about a ******* foot. If that. Look at mph's for the whos faster.
4 tenths = 1 ft. by the end of the quarter mile. Really? I didn't know that. LOL
Old 08-14-2011, 11:29 PM
  #354  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

On the street .4 is close enough I wouldn't throw up more than 50$ or so. Were talking 1 car length at most.
Old 08-14-2011, 11:56 PM
  #355  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paywithdeath
You realize the difference of 12.3/12.7 is literally about a ******* foot. If that. Look at mph's for the whos faster.
the 12.3 run for the A6 5.0 was @113 the 12.7-13.0 runs from others are in the 108-110 range. thats almost a 4+mph difference
Old 08-15-2011, 05:19 PM
  #356  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It really depends on what the DA is on these nights you guys claim are so "good," and see the 5.0s running high 12s/low 13s.
Old 08-15-2011, 11:27 PM
  #357  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
my point exactly for 1 guy to get a 12.3 in a bone stock A6 dosent add up. Im willing to bet he had DR's and some kind of tune
SO they don't run better then that at your track so they haven't did it no where?

Cause if that the case I haven't seen any stock SRT8 of any kind run better then mid 13's to high 14's at our track or at SAR. SO I guess all the SRT8's are mid 13 sec cars. Watched a SC 2010 SRT8 Chally run 12.7-12.9's all night one night. SO I geuss they need a blower to run high 12's.

EVery track is going to have different times these cars run cause of several things. I watched a Convertible auto 5.0 run 12.8-13.1 all night after some practice. Watched a manual run 13.3-13.6 all night on the same night. Both stock cars. The guy in the manual couldn't shift and couldn't launch his car. A week later the guy in the manual was running 12.5's in his car with some practice and still bone stock. The convt. was running 12.3-12.5 with a tune.
Old 08-16-2011, 01:42 AM
  #358  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
FYI my local track (Sacramento Raceway Park) sees anywhere from +200-500 ft in the cooler months.

5.0 A6's don't run low 12's in positive DA. I'm sure, deep down you already know that tho.
This is about the DA I see as well. And as mentioned I have yet to see a SRT8 anything run a 12 bone stock. Seen a SC SRT8 run high 12's. So does that mean they all do? I have also yet to see a C6Z06 run better then high 11's low 12's does that mean they don't do better then that stock? Hell I still have yet to see a C/H/I LS1 Fbody run better then 11.9. SO guess that fastest list on here for the ones that was gutted and everything going 10's is not true at all. I mean they don't have video's. And then with a video they could be hiding NOS.
Old 08-16-2011, 03:40 AM
  #359  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
SO they don't run better then that at your track so they haven't did it no where?

Cause if that the case I haven't seen any stock SRT8 of any kind run better then mid 13's to high 14's at our track or at SAR. SO I guess all the SRT8's are mid 13 sec cars. Watched a SC 2010 SRT8 Chally run 12.7-12.9's all night one night. SO I geuss they need a blower to run high 12's.

EVery track is going to have different times these cars run cause of several things. I watched a Convertible auto 5.0 run 12.8-13.1 all night after some practice. Watched a manual run 13.3-13.6 all night on the same night. Both stock cars. The guy in the manual couldn't shift and couldn't launch his car. A week later the guy in the manual was running 12.5's in his car with some practice and still bone stock. The convt. was running 12.3-12.5 with a tune.
I like how you always bring up SRT8s like its the only care Ive owned. Its a 4000+lb tuna boat that has no problem with beating and keeping up with Stangs so why would I be mad? Most SRT8's you come across are going to run like 14 second cars because the owner saw "425hp" and automatically thinks their going to run 12's by just stepping on the gas. Just like alot of 5.0 owners watched the evolution stang videos and instantly thought im going to run 10's with bolt ons
Old 08-16-2011, 03:45 AM
  #360  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
SO they don't run better then that at your track so they haven't did it no where?

Cause if that the case I haven't seen any stock SRT8 of any kind run better then mid 13's to high 14's at our track or at SAR. SO I guess all the SRT8's are mid 13 sec cars. Watched a SC 2010 SRT8 Chally run 12.7-12.9's all night one night. SO I geuss they need a blower to run high 12's.

EVery track is going to have different times these cars run cause of several things. I watched a Convertible auto 5.0 run 12.8-13.1 all night after some practice. Watched a manual run 13.3-13.6 all night on the same night. Both stock cars. The guy in the manual couldn't shift and couldn't launch his car. A week later the guy in the manual was running 12.5's in his car with some practice and still bone stock. The convt. was running 12.3-12.5 with a tune.
Ok and I watched an Intake, Exhaust, and Pullied 03 Cobra run 8.6 in the 1/8th so i guess that means they need a 2.8KB to run 7's...


Quick Reply: 06 GTO vs 392 hemi challenger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.