Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

1997 Cobra vs 1994 Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2011, 10:07 PM
  #161  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,938
Received 430 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

That was funny.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:11 PM
  #162  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
That was funny.
Why am I not surprised that you find that funny.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:16 PM
  #163  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Screen name is that of a poser is why he thinks its funny
Old 10-05-2011, 10:18 PM
  #164  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And im not judging u. Im going by you admiting it doesnt run that
Old 10-05-2011, 10:20 PM
  #165  
Teching In
 
F8L BYT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville / Indianapolis
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
I think from a dig, with a sticky tire, better gearing would help quite a bit, but he raced another 97 Cobra with the same mods as this one, plus o/r x and 4.30 gears and it didn't really seem much faster from a roll. Should be interesting when the two Cobras line up.

Also keep in mind that if these cars were both bone stock, the Cobra would walk pretty good. The Z28 dynoed 230 rwhp stock and put down 272 rwhp with the current mods.
Yeah I know what you are saying, they are close in power which is why it was a good run I suppose.... That 4.30 geared car happen to be owned by Joe? I know him

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
I still wish we could have ran when I had my old car! Would have been a fun no BS run on motor and on spray

What was more upsetting was going to Cordova when DA was negative this summer whereas when I went last summer the car ran a 13.024@103.33 NA in 2700 DA. I can only imagine what the new pcm tune for the tranny and nitrous would have done for it in negative DA
Yeah I know man it would have, I dont race people if they are goin to get all bent out of shape and **** because I only like doing it for fun. I didn't know you got a new car what did you get?

Originally Posted by WhitePhoenix99
Would you like to be?
I don't mind friendly runs but it wouldnt be until next year, my car is torn apart right now. Send me a pm later sometime and I wont mind a friendly run :beer:

Originally Posted by ZFreie
Its sad a v8 N/A engine was any kind of fight for a BOOSTED factory forged V8 engine! Period.
I hate when people say **** like this, who cares that it was supercharged, its only 281 cubic inches! Ford could have made a big cubic inch engine that made a ton of power but they didnt, they wanted to go this route
Old 10-05-2011, 10:20 PM
  #166  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What the **** are you talking about man . I never "admitted" anything. I don't even have that Mustang anymore, and it wasn't a Mach 1.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:37 PM
  #167  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L BYT
I hate when people say **** like this, who cares that it was supercharged, its only 281 cubic inches! Ford could have made a big cubic inch engine that made a ton of power but they didnt, they wanted to go this route
The reverse of this for the GM engines is less valves and no super charger lol

But Yea I'm sorry for bringing it up, only thing is, its still a huge advantage for the cobra and ford failed in using all of its factory potential, the cobra should have been the thing everything feared, i mean super charged from the factory come on lol The cobra should have been a 400+whp car from the factory.

my .02 anywho
Old 10-05-2011, 10:43 PM
  #168  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZFreie
The reverse of this for the GM engines is less valves and no super charger lol

But Yea I'm sorry for bringing it up, only thing is, its still a huge advantage for the cobra and ford failed in using all of its factory potential, the cobra should have been the thing everything feared, i mean super charged from the factory come on lol The cobra should have been a 400+whp car from the factory.

my .02 anywho
Why should they have spent more money and more risk to make it a 400+whp car when there was no Fbody to compare it to, it outran C5s off the showroom floor, and gave the Z06 a run for it's money?
Old 10-05-2011, 10:49 PM
  #169  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Why should they have spent more money and more risk to make it a 400+whp car when there was no Fbody to compare it to, it outran C5s off the showroom floor, and gave the Z06 a run for it's money?
Then why bother putting a super charger on it and fully forged internals....?
Old 10-05-2011, 10:51 PM
  #170  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So buyers could upgrade easily.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:54 PM
  #171  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
So buyers could upgrade easily.
Yes I'm much aware of this, my point was ford already spent how much IN the engine, and we all know a simple pulley swap and boom more power, My point was just simply i wish ford had done that when it came out. Thats all
Old 10-05-2011, 10:58 PM
  #172  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZFreie
Yes I'm much aware of this, my point was ford already spent how much IN the engine, and we all know a simple pulley swap and boom more power, My point was just simply i wish ford had done that when it came out. Thats all
So Ford should have added more boost to a blower that already was known to create a lot of heat? What else should they have done that you don't approve of? Have you taken these ideas to Ford?
Old 10-05-2011, 11:08 PM
  #173  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ur right it isnt a mach. I didnt look very close. Maybe im a hillbilly and dont get it but what in that pic does run 11s the s200 in the back?
Old 10-05-2011, 11:09 PM
  #174  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Shitty phone 2000 sry
Old 10-05-2011, 11:13 PM
  #175  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
Ur right it isnt a mach. I didnt look very close. Maybe im a hillbilly and dont get it but what in that pic does run 11s the s200 in the back?
You care way too much man. Just let it go... He doesn't care...I didn't care...you are the only one who does.
Old 10-05-2011, 11:16 PM
  #176  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
So Ford should have added more boost to a blower that already was known to create a lot of heat? What else should they have done that you don't approve of? Have you taken these ideas to Ford?
You never stop making me wonder lol you make my brain hurt. Nice job on over thinking it but I'm going back to lurking now. Waste of effort.
Old 10-05-2011, 11:35 PM
  #177  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
Ur right it isnt a mach. I didnt look very close. Maybe im a hillbilly and dont get it but what in that pic does run 11s the s200 in the back?
For all you know, everything in that picture could run 11s. But I made this name almost six years ago when I had my bike. Man, time flies.
Old 10-06-2011, 12:34 AM
  #178  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8L BYT
Yeah I know man it would have, I dont race people if they are goin to get all bent out of shape and **** because I only like doing it for fun. I didn't know you got a new car what did you get?
I haven't gotten a new one. Now I'm down to an 03 Eclipse GS I got from my mom for free when I was 16. It is rather depressing! lol

Junior year of college now and planning on grad school, so the toy is on the back burner for a bit. Thinking of a C6 when I'm done though. The funds are there, we'll see
Old 10-06-2011, 02:53 AM
  #179  
registered user
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by F8L BYT
Yeah I know what you are saying, they are close in power which is why it was a good run I suppose.... That 4.30 geared car happen to be owned by? I know him
I don't use named for obvious reasons, but he's DVJ38 on SVTP
Old 10-06-2011, 06:54 AM
  #180  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

good excuse for the screen name then i guess. i wouldnt have began to give you **** 11s if you hadn't jumped in this one.


Quick Reply: 1997 Cobra vs 1994 Z28



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.