5.0 Vs 04 GTO
10-26-2011, 11:23 PM
#61
The Camaro that you are talking about, remember the one you told to get a mustang because it was slow, makes over 600 tire horse power and would embarrass you right now and still run you with a blower. A stall and tune 5.0 wouldn't even be a race and you said it would be faster. Your head is so far up ford's *** you can taste their lunch.
Either way it is faster then a camaro..LOL
Last edited by Dark SS; 10-26-2011 at 11:29 PM.
10-27-2011, 12:14 AM
#63
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Garland, TX
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-27-2011, 09:00 AM
#64
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-27-2011, 11:07 AM
#65
Lol, you are such a predictable jackass. When did I bring my car up here? When did I say my car couldn't beat your ugly as sin shitbox?
The Camaro that you are talking about, remember the one you told to get a mustang because it was slow, makes over 600 tire horse power and would embarrass you right now and still run you with a blower. A stall and tune 5.0 wouldn't even be a race and you said it would be faster. Your head is so far up ford's *** you can taste their lunch.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178601
The Camaro that you are talking about, remember the one you told to get a mustang because it was slow, makes over 600 tire horse power and would embarrass you right now and still run you with a blower. A stall and tune 5.0 wouldn't even be a race and you said it would be faster. Your head is so far up ford's *** you can taste their lunch.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178601
As mentioned so how much we putting on our run? Don't tell me you are scarred now. Invite her camaro also so I can spank you both.
10-27-2011, 11:44 AM
#66
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, you are such a predictable jackass. When did I bring my car up here? When did I say my car couldn't beat your ugly as sin shitbox?
The Camaro that you are talking about, remember the one you told to get a mustang because it was slow, makes over 600 tire horse power and would embarrass you right now and still run you with a blower. A stall and tune 5.0 wouldn't even be a race and you said it would be faster. Your head is so far up ford's *** you can taste their lunch.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178601
The Camaro that you are talking about, remember the one you told to get a mustang because it was slow, makes over 600 tire horse power and would embarrass you right now and still run you with a blower. A stall and tune 5.0 wouldn't even be a race and you said it would be faster. Your head is so far up ford's *** you can taste their lunch.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178601
10-27-2011, 01:20 PM
#68
No just good decent DA and track prep. Seen few go 110-112 bone stock here. Manuals seem to be 2-3 mph more from what i have seen in person.
with the 5000 above sea level I believe it.
What crazy is my buddies car has out trapped me every time. We can run the same ET but he is always has a 1-2mph trap better. We have the same trim, same mods and same tune. Only diff is gears. But even when we both had 3.73's he trapped least 1-2 mph more. Now I have 4.10's he has 3.90's. Same track same lane one right after the other.
with the 5000 above sea level I believe it.
What crazy is my buddies car has out trapped me every time. We can run the same ET but he is always has a 1-2mph trap better. We have the same trim, same mods and same tune. Only diff is gears. But even when we both had 3.73's he trapped least 1-2 mph more. Now I have 4.10's he has 3.90's. Same track same lane one right after the other.
10-27-2011, 11:15 PM
#69
Why would they? They quicker then bone stock 98-02s with better potential for power due to the ls3(for 6 speeds).
LS1 Goats was like hey, lets throw a same motor that we put in a 3400lb camaro into a 3900lb gto with IRS and the ability to fit no tire under the rear.
Id say the exact same for first gen cts-vs but at least they used the LS6 instead of the ls1.
LS1 Goats was like hey, lets throw a same motor that we put in a 3400lb camaro into a 3900lb gto with IRS and the ability to fit no tire under the rear.
Id say the exact same for first gen cts-vs but at least they used the LS6 instead of the ls1.
10-28-2011, 07:15 AM
#71
600whp that it. It will still lose. They are have been proven ro run what mid 11's with that power. 5th gen camaro's are a joke just like you. And you should do research I know least 3 big stall tune 5.0's going low 11's. Hell on guy just took a manual to low 11's. With simple mods no headers or anything. http://www.modularfords.com/forums/f...filter-181340/
As mentioned so how much we putting on our run? Don't tell me you are scarred now. Invite her camaro also so I can spank you both.
As mentioned so how much we putting on our run? Don't tell me you are scarred now. Invite her camaro also so I can spank you both.
Whipple and stalled 5th gens with out a cam are capable and have ran mid-high 10's. The auto's are faster because they can get out of the hole and hold the car in power band better than a manual. The 5th gen is a heavy car and most run dog **** times because they are dyno queens and these guys are taking 800 whp cars to the track on 22" street tires. I'm not defending the 5th gen, in fact I'm most likely getting rid of my car and getting a Vette. The 5.0 is over rated and runs similar times to a 5th gen. The difference is the 5.0 has more enthusiasts doing it. There's 2 stock bottom end cars in the 9's and a handful of bolt-on cars in the 11's. This idiot thinks the 5.0 is god's gift to man and has to post in every thread on an LS site about how great his ugly piece of **** is. His car is quick and there's no doubt he has smacked a lot of 5th gens but the flip side to that is I have NEVER witnessed a 5.0 run any faster than a 12.7 and I have destroyed every one I have come across off the bottle.
10-28-2011, 07:37 AM
#72
We can run for whatever you want. It's worth it to me just to post the vid and watch you back track like the moron you are.
Whipple and stalled 5th gens with out a cam are capable and have ran mid-high 10's. The auto's are faster because they can get out of the hole and hold the car in power band better than a manual. The 5th gen is a heavy car and most run dog **** times because they are dyno queens and these guys are taking 800 whp cars to the track on 22" street tires. I'm not defending the 5th gen, in fact I'm most likely getting rid of my car and getting a Vette. The 5.0 is over rated and runs similar times to a 5th gen. The difference is the 5.0 has more enthusiasts doing it. There's 2 stock bottom end cars in the 9's and a handful of bolt-on cars in the 11's. This idiot thinks the 5.0 is god's gift to man and has to post in every thread on an LS site about how great his ugly piece of **** is. His car is quick and there's no doubt he has smacked a lot of 5th gens but the flip side to that is I have NEVER witnessed a 5.0 run any faster than a 12.7 and I have destroyed every one I have come across off the bottle.
Whipple and stalled 5th gens with out a cam are capable and have ran mid-high 10's. The auto's are faster because they can get out of the hole and hold the car in power band better than a manual. The 5th gen is a heavy car and most run dog **** times because they are dyno queens and these guys are taking 800 whp cars to the track on 22" street tires. I'm not defending the 5th gen, in fact I'm most likely getting rid of my car and getting a Vette. The 5.0 is over rated and runs similar times to a 5th gen. The difference is the 5.0 has more enthusiasts doing it. There's 2 stock bottom end cars in the 9's and a handful of bolt-on cars in the 11's. This idiot thinks the 5.0 is god's gift to man and has to post in every thread on an LS site about how great his ugly piece of **** is. His car is quick and there's no doubt he has smacked a lot of 5th gens but the flip side to that is I have NEVER witnessed a 5.0 run any faster than a 12.7 and I have destroyed every one I have come across off the bottle.
Hell buy a vette it be more fun as you would stand a lot more of a chance with some mods on it. I already have a few races lined up with some that will get video's of. Ones that might just beat me. A few that just think they can or want to run for the hell of it. Plus I agreed to run one that I know will beat me. WHich the two I know that will beat me or least 1 I know will is a TT Z06. The other Z06 makes right at 640whp N/A.
10-28-2011, 08:47 AM
#74
Better question is what isn't...LOL
I know he has h/c/i full bolt ons. The thing sounds crazy just idling. Almost like wants to die. Some one else said he it is actually a LSX 454. I seen him run one pass at the track. Let out at the right before 1000' and still ran a mid 10@12X.
I know he has h/c/i full bolt ons. The thing sounds crazy just idling. Almost like wants to die. Some one else said he it is actually a LSX 454. I seen him run one pass at the track. Let out at the right before 1000' and still ran a mid 10@12X.
10-28-2011, 02:14 PM
#75
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LoL, so that right there proves that the new 5.0 is over rated.
You guys should see what Ohio posts on the Mustang boards...he does the same thing to the Mustang owners about the LSx as what he does to y'all about the 5.0...he is absolutely jerking y'all's chain
10-28-2011, 02:28 PM
#76
I just tell truth. Guys saying Z06's cant run low 11's and **** is just stupid. Just read a thread where a guy was saying that Z06's are high 11 sec cars at best. I mean really. What funner is a guy on mustangevolution saying his 2010 GT was faster then 2010 SS's but not faster then the 2011 SS's. As they had way more power. His 2010 GT was bone stock. LOL I had to bust him out. It had to be done.
10-28-2011, 03:02 PM
#78
We can run for whatever you want. It's worth it to me just to post the vid and watch you back track like the moron you are.
Whipple and stalled 5th gens with out a cam are capable and have ran mid-high 10's. The auto's are faster because they can get out of the hole and hold the car in power band better than a manual. The 5th gen is a heavy car and most run dog **** times because they are dyno queens and these guys are taking 800 whp cars to the track on 22" street tires. I'm not defending the 5th gen, in fact I'm most likely getting rid of my car and getting a Vette. The 5.0 is over rated and runs similar times to a 5th gen. The difference is the 5.0 has more enthusiasts doing it. There's 2 stock bottom end cars in the 9's and a handful of bolt-on cars in the 11's. This idiot thinks the 5.0 is god's gift to man and has to post in every thread on an LS site about how great his ugly piece of **** is. His car is quick and there's no doubt he has smacked a lot of 5th gens but the flip side to that is I have NEVER witnessed a 5.0 run any faster than a 12.7 and I have destroyed every one I have come across off the bottle.
Whipple and stalled 5th gens with out a cam are capable and have ran mid-high 10's. The auto's are faster because they can get out of the hole and hold the car in power band better than a manual. The 5th gen is a heavy car and most run dog **** times because they are dyno queens and these guys are taking 800 whp cars to the track on 22" street tires. I'm not defending the 5th gen, in fact I'm most likely getting rid of my car and getting a Vette. The 5.0 is over rated and runs similar times to a 5th gen. The difference is the 5.0 has more enthusiasts doing it. There's 2 stock bottom end cars in the 9's and a handful of bolt-on cars in the 11's. This idiot thinks the 5.0 is god's gift to man and has to post in every thread on an LS site about how great his ugly piece of **** is. His car is quick and there's no doubt he has smacked a lot of 5th gens but the flip side to that is I have NEVER witnessed a 5.0 run any faster than a 12.7 and I have destroyed every one I have come across off the bottle.
I want in on this bet! money on ohio!
10-28-2011, 03:08 PM
#79
I have said it a million times that the Camaro is heavy and is hard get to run fast. I'm not one of these blind Camaro humpers on Camaro5. I'm just sick of hearing the broken record that is ohio. I mean ****, I even hate that state.
10-28-2011, 03:25 PM
#80
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure it was one of these typical new Camaro drivers. Any way you cut it a 580ish rwhp car should rape a 430 rwhp car. That's obvious. I'm sure it's the same with all these slow 5.0's I see. The real difference is once you start getting over 450 rwhp the Camaro rear end and suspension can't handle it where the 5.0 can. Built they are pretty damn close, there is just more racers with the 5.0
I have said it a million times that the Camaro is heavy and is hard get to run fast. I'm not one of these blind Camaro humpers on Camaro5. I'm just sick of hearing the broken record that is ohio. I mean ****, I even hate that state.
I have said it a million times that the Camaro is heavy and is hard get to run fast. I'm not one of these blind Camaro humpers on Camaro5. I'm just sick of hearing the broken record that is ohio. I mean ****, I even hate that state.