Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2000 Firebird Trans Am WS.6 vs. 2011 Mustang GT 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2012, 01:29 PM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Azar_Hawke
Yeah, I'd say it's the first stock na motor that Ford put out for a Mustang that could beat an f-body. Only took them 10 years.
Only 10? When did you start counting?

Depending on if you ignore the Mach 1 or not the number would be higher or lower.
Old 03-05-2012, 01:33 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Grudge Night
why is it that the 5.0 should win? im just curious.
It's a faster car period. More hp stronger rear ect..
Old 03-05-2012, 01:37 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
 
41863nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AZAR-HAWKE...i think you did a great job, coming from one 2000 WS6 owner to another..

10 years, ahhh true, but let's not forget the termi's as well...
Old 03-05-2012, 01:38 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The car is just faster more power almost same weight with a stronger rearend and it's a newer car. The 5.0 don't need a aftermarket cams or heads to Dyno over 400rwhp but the street is the street anything can happen doesn't mean the car is faster all the time
Old 03-05-2012, 01:45 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
I call shenanigans on those high rwhp numbers (many of which were found to be dyno'd in a gear other than 1:1)... when a boss puts down less and is rated higher I just have a hard time believing it. Not to mention the 1/4 mile times don't match up with that kind of rwhp and the curb weight.

If not mistaken 370-380ish is what a new 5.0 puts down in stock form when dyno'd in 5th (1:1)... you can easily inflate the numbers by using 4th though.

Livernoise Motorsports claims they put down 375rwhp then 391rwhp after 2000 miles were put on their test car. So who knows... maybe 400rwhp is possible and I'm just jealous.
Manuals will be a little different depending on gear in it. They can have 3.31/3.55/3.73's. But the average is about 370-380 for them. Auto's avewrage 350-360. The boss averages about 395-405.

As far as 1/4 mile times they have large range in times as well. Driver/track/prep/model of 5.0/ all play a roll. Best bone stock I have seen/heard is 12.2@114 ran up north. Auto was 12.3@112 up north as well. Average best is around 12.5-12.7. Then it gets worse from there. I have seen a few guys run 13.4-13.7 driving like **** and spinning hard off line.

This last week at tarck two guys showed up with a new 5.0 and a new SS. Buddies and they raced each other back and forth. The 5.0 driver ran high 13's all night. The SS ran low 14's. Swapped drivers and the SS ran a high 13 and the 5.0 ran a low 14. Both was on stock tires and both drivers was doing no real burn out and was trying to launch pretty hard. Bad part was another stock 5.0 was averaging 12.6-12.8 and another stock SS was running higher 12.8's and low 13's. Just shows driver plays a huge roll.
Old 03-05-2012, 02:07 PM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
Manuals will be a little different depending on gear in it. They can have 3.31/3.55/3.73's. But the average is about 370-380 for them. Auto's avewrage 350-360. The boss averages about 395-405.

As far as 1/4 mile times they have large range in times as well. Driver/track/prep/model of 5.0/ all play a roll. Best bone stock I have seen/heard is 12.2@114 ran up north. Auto was 12.3@112 up north as well. Average best is around 12.5-12.7. Then it gets worse from there. I have seen a few guys run 13.4-13.7 driving like **** and spinning hard off line.

This last week at tarck two guys showed up with a new 5.0 and a new SS. Buddies and they raced each other back and forth. The 5.0 driver ran high 13's all night. The SS ran low 14's. Swapped drivers and the SS ran a high 13 and the 5.0 ran a low 14. Both was on stock tires and both drivers was doing no real burn out and was trying to launch pretty hard. Bad part was another stock 5.0 was averaging 12.6-12.8 and another stock SS was running higher 12.8's and low 13's. Just shows driver plays a huge roll.
Well put!
Old 03-05-2012, 04:28 PM
  #27  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Only 10? When did you start counting?

Depending on if you ignore the Mach 1 or not the number would be higher or lower.
Oh please, not this BS again. Mach 1 has never been faster apples to apples. Very close though. However, with the new 5.0 there is no doubt.
Old 03-05-2012, 06:02 PM
  #28  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
I call shenanigans on those high rwhp numbers (many of which were found to be dyno'd in a gear other than 1:1)... when a boss puts down less and is rated higher I just have a hard time believing it. Not to mention the 1/4 mile times don't match up with that kind of rwhp and the curb weight.

If not mistaken 370-380ish is what a new 5.0 puts down in stock form when dyno'd in 5th (1:1)... you can easily inflate the numbers by using 4th though.

Livernoise Motorsports claims they put down 375rwhp then 391rwhp after 2000 miles were put on their test car. So who knows... maybe 400rwhp is possible and I'm just jealous.
Dynos match speed of the tire vs. RPM...dynoing in 4th wouldn't give higher numbers...a guy on corral disproved this theory when he got his car dyno'd in 3rd and in 4th (an older 5 speed Mustang)...the dyno chart showed the lesser numbers in 3rd gear.
Old 03-05-2012, 06:19 PM
  #29  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
Dynos match speed of the tire vs. RPM...dynoing in 4th wouldn't give higher numbers...a guy on corral disproved this theory when he got his car dyno'd in 3rd and in 4th (an older 5 speed Mustang)...the dyno chart showed the lesser numbers in 3rd gear.
Depends on the dyno, the one I used needed a correction applied to use a different gear or the numbers were skewed. If why your saying was correct than a 5.0 GT makes more power than a boss 302.
Old 03-05-2012, 06:30 PM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Honorable death! Those new GT's are no slouch. Ask me how I know.
Old 03-05-2012, 06:32 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

The 5.0 will dyno less in 4th then in 5th for the manual. I know from experiance. When they first dyno'd my car they did in 4th not knowing the 1:1 gear was 5th. They redid it in 5th. The car made 14whp more in 5th if I remember right and 23wtq more. The auto's are dyno'd in 4th. Boss makes more power then the GT. On average about 20whp more and actually 10wtq less.
Old 03-05-2012, 06:57 PM
  #32  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Then how does a gt make 400rwhp stock and a boss pulls less than or equal too?

Fwiw the 4th vs 5th thing has been speculated since the cars came out. If a 5th gear pull makes more you will have to convince me a stock 5.0 puts down 410+ rwhp which is going to be hard.

Is it possible this is an STD vs SAE issue?

http://forums.themustangsource.com/f...octane-487398/
According to this a 4th gear pull makes significantly less rwhp on the dyno than 5th. Now I have no idea what to think. Lol

Last edited by S8ER95Z; 03-05-2012 at 07:15 PM.
Old 03-05-2012, 07:09 PM
  #33  
Staging Lane
 
bandit1transam01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There was a guy at the street machines nationals in springfield getting a 2011 5.0 dynoed. He only had headers on the car so far and according to the dyno sheet, it dynoed in at around 390 rwhp.
Old 03-05-2012, 07:44 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Then how does a gt make 400rwhp stock and a boss pulls less than or equal too?

Fwiw the 4th vs 5th thing has been speculated since the cars came out. If a 5th gear pull makes more you will have to convince me a stock 5.0 puts down 410+ rwhp which is going to be hard.

Is it possible this is an STD vs SAE issue?

http://forums.themustangsource.com/f...octane-487398/
According to this a 4th gear pull makes significantly less rwhp on the dyno than 5th. Now I have no idea what to think. Lol
No stock 5.0 will make 400whp period. If it does the dyno pull is BS.
Old 03-05-2012, 09:49 PM
  #35  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z

http://forums.themustangsource.com/f...octane-487398/
According to this a 4th gear pull makes significantly less rwhp on the dyno than 5th. Now I have no idea what to think. Lol
I wasn't yanking your chain...I am sure when guys quote the dyno #'s of their new 5.0s they use the 5th gear 1:1 numbers...I feel bad for the poor schmuck running around quoting his 4th gear numbers with no idea that his car actually makes more power (on the dyno) in 5th gear than the 4th gear he tested.
Old 03-05-2012, 10:11 PM
  #36  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,465
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
I wasn't yanking your chain...I am sure when guys quote the dyno #'s of their new 5.0s they use the 5th gear 1:1 numbers...I feel bad for the poor schmuck running around quoting his 4th gear numbers with no idea that his car actually makes more power (on the dyno) in 5th gear than the 4th gear he tested.
I appreciate the info, please take no offense when I challenge things... I spend a lot of time looking things up and questioning so I have facts to base things on.
Old 03-05-2012, 10:53 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Azar_Hawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 41863nj
AZAR-HAWKE...i think you did a great job, coming from one 2000 WS6 owner to another..

10 years, ahhh true, but let's not forget the termi's as well...
Termis weren't NA, though.

And I guess I had that wrong, I had read somewhere that there were stock 5.0s dynoing around 400, but maybe they were rounding up.

I think my dad needs some better tires too. He's just got the PZero Neros, the lower all season brand of PZeros. If he slapped some wider PZero summers on there I think he would've launched a lot better.

When my rear diff breaks and I upgrade to a Fab 9, I'm gonna have to get him to come with me to a drag strip and try a few rounds...but I'm not going to the drags until I've upgraded my diff.

I had a blast racing him though, and I hope you guys enjoyed the story. I'm sure there will be many more to come.
Old 03-05-2012, 11:50 PM
  #38  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
I appreciate the info, please take no offense when I challenge things... I spend a lot of time looking things up and questioning so I have facts to base things on.
No worries, man It's how we learn...
Old 03-06-2012, 12:01 AM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Fords suck. That is all!
Old 03-06-2012, 12:12 AM
  #40  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
Fords suck. That is all!
Tell me about it...old man.


Quick Reply: 2000 Firebird Trans Am WS.6 vs. 2011 Mustang GT 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.