99peweterls1

iTrader: (1)

Look at that horrible pass in the first vid and it still went 12.3 @ 124! Lol thats nuts

Are you serious with this Ohio, what did your car run on street tires?

Redfire 03

That's not your car though. Don't end up like Evan or Ohio and feed into all the internet hype then get to the track and be disappointed. LOL It is not that easy to get those traps out of a bolt-on Coyote.

Redfire 03

I know it pisses you off your 730rwhp supercharged stalled automatic car runs high 10s. LOL And I can post videos of ZR1's going much faster, but that's weak. I want to see your modded stang run a decent time for its power. I know I've seen F-bodies with much less power run quicker than your slow heap all day.

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

honestly, comments like those ^ are the sole god damn reason i dont bother racing a car that is unprepared to race. Because people on here feed off of it and use it against you. I said numerous times the car wasnt ready to race... yet people kept saying just run it, just run it. So i did. And since it didnt run the number because it wasnt prepared... now im the jackass that gave in to internet hype???.. please...

Excuse me while i humbly bend over while all the haters kiss my ***.

Ill stick to roll racing and doing what i want, when i want. When i think the car is ready to run the number... ill go back to the track. So sick of reading the ignorant biased comments off of this site.

99peweterls1

iTrader: (1)

I understand how you feel. If all you do is roll race, which I do also, how can you compare your car to another on here. You can't That's when the track comes into play it's not an exact science for various reasons you know but it's better than just judging from cars we have raced. Maybe we can all get vbox's for Christmas and compare those times with each other.

corysmach1

Just curious....in your eyes what should a good running average heads cam ls1 trap? Full weight also.

99peweterls1

iTrader: (1)

Decent h/c f-body's 3500-3600lb race weight. In my eyes 122-123 at least!

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

Already have access too one. Thats usually how i compare cars...

corysmach1

I never said it was my car? Are the vids your posting your car? Are the cars that your talking about and comparing to evans and ohios cars your car? Doubtul..... and i never said it was gonna be easy to trap those speeds.....i like challenges so we will see.

Redfire 03

First off, why would I hate on you? For what?! Let's be realistic here.

Now all foolishness aside, im curious as to how your car was "unprepared" for the track? Didn't you take a set of drag radials with you? What are all the guys you mentioned running 11s tire-only doing that you weren't? My comment wasn't too offend you, I was using an example of how guys like you throw numbers out there of what their cars will do, like the numerous times you claimed your car will have no problem trapping 122 only to be way off! that's all. Don't get mad, it is what it is. If you can't take constructive criticism then you're probably in the wrong hobby.

corysmach1

What track? Is this with big and lils? Gears?

99peweterls1

iTrader: (1)

Well excuse me mr. Fancy boss guy. Lol

automach1

Lol at decent running h/c fbodys traping 122+ at fullweight

00silverGTP

iTrader: (3)

I just had to quote this for the lols....

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

The reasons people like Redfire,Hio and others preach to take it to the track in threads where people argue on how fast a car is etc is that roll racing on the street is a poor way to determine how fast a car is. Too many variables on the street(engine temp,fuel levels etc..). Anything can happen on the street. But when people who have a chip on their shoulders etc say because of a few random encounters on the street is what a car runs is totally not realistic. Track is a controlled environment. The clocks don't lie 90 percent of the time. Some cars suck from a dig and are better from rolls-doesn't mean they suck. But when people post kills and then badmouthing the cars they beat(in terms of ET and power) then that is not right and almost laughable.

Redfire 03

I haven't posted one video in this thread. That's you Mustang boys desperately trying to prove a point. Nice try though.

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

Ive never bad mouthed a single car i have ever raced.. I leave that to ls1tech. Since everyone on here always has to voice there opinion. I also cant stand the mentality that only drag racing defines how fast a car is... everything else is void. To me thats BS.

99peweterls1

iTrader: (1)

I wouldn't be laughing if my h/c car made cam only numbers to the wheels. Lol

Edit: I'm glad mike posted in here look at that mod list on his car. Does anything in there look abnormal? How's it coming on the results with the heads mike?

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

Just saying lol. Hows this for comparison.

My gto went 11.4 at 120
My buddies 403 ss went 11.2 at 128

I vboxed 60-130 in 9.4 seconds
He did 60-130 in 9.1 seconds.

From 50-150... he had me by 2 cars.

Which unit of measurement sounds more accurate for our roll race?

Marc 85Z28

iTrader: (8)

They got the car under 2800lbs. And they were NOT using Shell UTR

I've run several 11.0s at around 122mph in 90 degree humid summer air. In good air I've gone a best of 10.8 @ 124. 3720lb raceweight. And I'm still running an off the shelf cam with truck heads on pump gas. I've seen more full weight H/C cars flirt with 130 than you have cars in your sig.