Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2014 5.3 sierra vs 6.2 sierra vs 2014 f 150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:00 PM
  #61  
It'llrun's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: N. FL
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
orly?
Congratulations! You're part of the 5%...

I like that color, btw.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:03 PM
  #62  
big hammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
Congratulations! You're part of the 5%...

I like that color, btw.
thanks. it hides dirt well.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:22 PM
  #63  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,976
Likes: 484
From: Winchester, VA
Default

I work mine as well. Usually well overloaded. I pulled 16000 (grossing 22000) multiple times......to many to count really. When I have my truck camper on the truck it weighs 11000, not including what I'm pulling behind it. Who knows how many cars it has pulled around.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:33 PM
  #64  
It'llrun's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: N. FL
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
Bro you are full of it lol. My 2012 ram 1500 i bought new has 65k miles on it. It has pulled trailers since day one.
So what?
So did my 2006 ram 3500, 6.4 powerstroke and 7.3 stroker also my 2003 chevy 1500.
Who cares?

You sound like a ******* idiot when you say Ram and GM owners don't use there trucks to work.
That is NOT what I said, dimwit... Pay attention and try again.

More then half of hotshot rigs and welders use cummins powered rams in Tx.
Yeah, I know... I know... you saw them ALL yourself... Save it. I ran those for awhile while living in TX... Who cares? The fact remains, according to the people who actually DO track this stuff... Go prove them wrong by checking registrations for yourself. Then tell them what a bunch of morons they are. See if I care.

Nobody likes being in the shop or broke down on the side of the road with a pos powerstroke.
That's what preventative maintenance is for and those who break down so much are doing something wrong. REALITY CHECK TIME: Why would Ford outsell GM and RAM.... OUTRIGHT in the HD segment if Ford sucks so badly????

Is it because SO MANY drivers DESIRE to be in the shop? Get a clue.

And yeah a 5yr 100k warranty is better than any Ford warranty.
Ford has offered a standard 5yr 100,000 mile warranty on the Super Duty diesel for years... Who knew? I knew... I think my 1993 model may have been covered that long, but probably not. However, many years of the PowerStroke were. The 2004 certainly was and ALL are, according to Fords warranty information.

So... If it REALLY matters... GREAT! Ford's done this for at least a decade... NEXT!
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:45 PM
  #65  
It'llrun's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: N. FL
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
Lol maybe to It'llrun But us folks that work trucks know that they couldn't pull a load without popping the heads or turbo going out or egr the list goes on. Even if the truck had a warranty you would go broke with the truck being in the shop all the time not making you any money.
If you had a decent clue, you'd still be lost.
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Really...lol....Same with 2v 4.6 and 5.4 trucks....lmao Those things work hard to move the truck empty. I still don't understand how Ford stayed in business making that kinda crap.

I guess people bought into the best selling vehicle thing and just kept buying it.....kinda like the best selling car the camry. What a horrible car. Driving one is like driving a refrigerator.
Those of us who've been around here awhile aren't surprised that you don't understand things... The 4.6L in pickups was no fun in 2v form, to be sure. That said, the 5.4L made 360+ lb-ft of torque... That can move plenty. It outworked GM and Dodge engines its size for a very long time. Still, anyone pulling a load regularly would prefer the diesel and all three make a pretty good one, regardless of early problems along the way. Everyone remembers the 6L problems for Ford, but hardly anyone remembers the early D-max, which we commonly called "Duracrack," "Durajunk," "Durablast," etc. because it popped gaskets like crazy and that ultimately led GM to lower the compression ratio considerably. Now it does fine, thanks to that and several other changes. Nothing's perfect.

The Camry is bland, but it isn't popular because it sucks.

Originally Posted by big hammer
ugh those 2v trucks were absolutely brutal. the 3v's weren't much better either.
Yes they were! The 3v probably saved the F-series, considering its predecessor. W/O that change, I'm convinced Ford would've sunk in the pickup department. The 5.4L went from 260hp to over 300.. torque didn't change much. The 4.6 went from nearly incapable to able.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:45 PM
  #66  
big hammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Default

used ford trucks are worthless.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:48 PM
  #67  
It'llrun's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: N. FL
Default

So are the rest... Trucks today are so loaded with electronics, they're too much a concern for me to buy used if I'm working it. Worse, the market is so crazy right now, you'll pay too close to "new" price for a used one anyway, so I'm not bothering.
Old 08-05-2013 | 12:58 PM
  #68  
Heater's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Wilmywood NC
Default

I'll stay out of this conversation with my spark plug spitting, 2V turd of a truck.


Still don't know why I bought it to haul family stuff and my car trailer.




Yes this post is jaded, persnickety and full of sarcasm
Old 08-05-2013 | 01:39 PM
  #69  
OneSlowV's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 406
Likes: 218
From: East Texas
Default

I'm tired of wasting time on it'llrun. Dude don't know **** comes in saying we don't work or trucks. And a warranty is worthless what planet did you come from damn.
Old 08-05-2013 | 01:40 PM
  #70  
1TFROT's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I work mine as well. Usually well overloaded. I pulled 16000 (grossing 22000) multiple times......to many to count really. When I have my truck camper on the truck it weighs 11000, not including what I'm pulling behind it. Who knows how many cars it has pulled around.
every time I tow, I'm grossing 22k. plus it's my DD.

my truck gets worked
Old 08-05-2013 | 01:52 PM
  #71  
OneSlowV's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 406
Likes: 218
From: East Texas
Default

Hell yeah you must be apart of the 5%
Old 08-05-2013 | 01:55 PM
  #72  
1TFROT's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: chi-town
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
Hell yeah you must be apart of the 5%
I try
Old 08-05-2013 | 04:34 PM
  #73  
adamantium's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 940
Likes: 3
From: From the abyss
Default

I guess the company i work for with 4 different location and 12 GM powered trucks are part of the 5% too
Old 08-05-2013 | 04:41 PM
  #74  
big hammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
I guess the company i work for with 4 different location and 12 GM powered trucks are part of the 5% too
5%, brah!
Old 08-05-2013 | 04:42 PM
  #75  
big hammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Default

I hear those 5.0 truck drop 5 seconds in the 1\4 with a high stall.
Old 08-05-2013 | 04:43 PM
  #76  
adamantium's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 940
Likes: 3
From: From the abyss
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
5%, brah!

5% crew in the da house.
Old 08-05-2013 | 04:49 PM
  #77  
snake95's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 36
From: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
I hear those 5.0 truck drop 5 seconds in the 1\4 with a high stall.
They be straight up rapin'!
Old 08-05-2013 | 05:03 PM
  #78  
sick_tight's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

haha because consumer buying trends means anything, all you do show someone something shiny on tv and they all go buy it.

a lot of people bought enron stocks and we all know how that worked out for them.

a lot of people buy mcdonalds and we know how that is for you, to sum up just because its the most bought product doesnt mean its the best
Old 08-05-2013 | 05:19 PM
  #79  
OneSlowV's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 406
Likes: 218
From: East Texas
Default

Exactly
Old 08-05-2013 | 05:34 PM
  #80  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,976
Likes: 484
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
If you had a decent clue, you'd still be lost.
Those of us who've been around here awhile aren't surprised that you don't understand things... The 4.6L in pickups was no fun in 2v form, to be sure. That said, the 5.4L made 360+ lb-ft of torque... That can move plenty. It outworked GM and Dodge engines its size for a very long time. Still, anyone pulling a load regularly would prefer the diesel and all three make a pretty good one, regardless of early problems along the way. Everyone remembers the 6L problems for Ford, but hardly anyone remembers the early D-max, which we commonly called "Duracrack," "Durajunk," "Durablast," etc. because it popped gaskets like crazy and that ultimately led GM to lower the compression ratio considerably. Now it does fine, thanks to that and several other changes. Nothing's perfect.

The Camry is bland, but it isn't popular because it sucks.

Yes they were! The 3v probably saved the F-series, considering its predecessor. W/O that change, I'm convinced Ford would've sunk in the pickup department. The 5.4L went from 260hp to over 300.. torque didn't change much. The 4.6 went from nearly incapable to able.
If you think a 2v 5.4 made any where near 360tq your the one that don't understand things. They were turds in a bad way. Spark plug spiting turds. The 3v's were not much better. Go ahead and change the plugs in one of those.....lmao. Consider yourself lucky if 1/2 of the plugs don't break off down in the head.

My 2500hd 6.0 has thrashed every 5.4 it's had in it's site......and it don't break a sweet doin it. 2v or 3v ......hell I give them a 1000lb weight advantage because they were 1/2 tons.


Quick Reply: 2014 5.3 sierra vs 6.2 sierra vs 2014 f 150



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.