5.0 vs 6.0

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 19, 2013 | 02:48 PM

#61

evangto87

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 1,007

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightningTeg

5.0's trap 120mph with an intake exhaust and tune?

Not quite that easy..

Sep 19, 2013 | 03:50 PM

#62

LightningTeg

Teching In

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

From: Indianapolis Area

Was about to say lol. Maybe 115-116 car

Sep 19, 2013 | 04:08 PM

#63

OneSlowV

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2013

Posts: 406

Likes: 218

From: East Texas

O yeah i got a steeda intake and 93 race tune. Pretty fast car for just the two mods.

Attached Thumbnails

Sep 19, 2013 | 04:09 PM

#64

OneSlowV

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2013

Posts: 406

Likes: 218

From: East Texas

I think with longtubes and no cats you could get close to a 120mph.

Sep 19, 2013 | 04:55 PM

#65

Blown383LS1

On The Tree

iTrader: (23)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 108

Likes: 14

Auto or manual?

Sep 19, 2013 | 05:40 PM

#66

sweet99ss

10 Second Club

iTrader: (41)

Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 1,907

Likes: 6

From: Plains Ks

I think auto/manual 5.0's run pretty close if manual driver is good.

Sep 19, 2013 | 06:17 PM

#67

T.Man

On The Tree

Joined: Oct 2010

Posts: 124

Likes: 2

From: Desert

I was under the assumption that this was the full exhaust, bolt on 5.0 that cracked into the tens with spray?

If that's the same car, then I don't see why it wouldn't go 119-120mph, especially with that wheel/tire combo?

Sep 19, 2013 | 06:26 PM

#68

BODUKE

11 Second Club

Joined: Jul 2010

Posts: 545

Likes: 2

GTO joke!

Sep 19, 2013 | 07:26 PM

#69

OneSlowV

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2013

Posts: 406

Likes: 218

From: East Texas

Manual all the way 3.31s

Sep 19, 2013 | 08:04 PM

#70

ohioborn80

10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 214

Likes: 252

From: Texas

This car should trap 120. I trapped 118 in ok weather with x pipe cold air and decent tune. On bigs and littles.

Sep 19, 2013 | 08:23 PM

#71

ATXSS

Staging Lane

Joined: Dec 2011

Posts: 89

Likes: 16

From: Austin, Texas

Mustang driver did well.

Sep 19, 2013 | 09:27 PM

#72

00silverGTP

TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 342

Likes: 0

From: Ohio

Looks about right to me. My brothers bolt on 5.0 is a 120 car.

Sep 19, 2013 | 09:43 PM

#73

6PntHo

Launching!

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2012

Posts: 213

Likes: 0

From: Jacksonville, FL

Gto needs a gear bad. But the 5.0s are pretty impressive to say the least.

Sep 19, 2013 | 10:03 PM

#74

S8ER95Z

12 Second Club

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 1,465

Likes: 51

From: NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lawhead

5.0 doing work !

Computer generated though LSx doesn't lose to Raggedy Ferds

Only cobras are raggedy... 5.0 GT = Lamborghini

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whiplash88

98-99s rated at 305 to the crank, 00-02 at 310-320ish. Plenty of people making 270-285whp ish stock, depending on the car or dyno.

How can you talk so much **** in here then drop this? My trolls are weak and pathetic compared to yours.

Sep 19, 2013 | 10:04 PM

#75

evangto87

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 1,007

Likes: 0

my point was its not as easy as people make it sound. They can do it with those mods though.

Sep 19, 2013 | 10:54 PM

#76

Whiplash88

Teching In

Joined: May 2013

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z

Only cobras are raggedy... 5.0 GT = Lamborghini

How can you talk so much **** in here then drop this? My trolls are weak and pathetic compared to yours.

Thing is your trolls aren't funny.

Sep 20, 2013 | 03:45 AM

#77

evangto87

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 1,007

Likes: 0

and watching this video... i assume GTO is full weight with 3.46s. A little bit of EJR weight reduction and some 3.90s... this would atleast be a good race.