340whp WRX vs 416 gto - street/dig
10-27-2013, 06:36 PM
#41
Is that victor JR ported at all? Massaged anywhere? If that thing is literally pulled out of the box and bolted on... there is 75% of your problem. That intake was designed to be ported. I cant tell you how many times ive seen it lose power over Fast intakes. You really have to have a good idea of CFM flow throughout the entire motor to use that intake. Get that car on a dyno and see what its doing.
10-27-2013, 06:50 PM
#42
Is that victor JR ported at all? Massaged anywhere? If that thing is literally pulled out of the box and bolted on... there is 75% of your problem. That intake was designed to be ported. I cant tell you how many times ive seen it lose power over Fast intakes. You really have to have a good idea of CFM flow throughout the entire motor to use that intake. Get that car on a dyno and see what its doing.
10-28-2013, 06:17 AM
#43
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that victor JR ported at all? Massaged anywhere? If that thing is literally pulled out of the box and bolted on... there is 75% of your problem. That intake was designed to be ported. I cant tell you how many times ive seen it lose power over Fast intakes. You really have to have a good idea of CFM flow throughout the entire motor to use that intake. Get that car on a dyno and see what its doing.
Should be well into the 10.30s then with a stock bottom end LQ9..?
Nice passes Cwarta, personally I thinks it's the 243s holding it back... Look for some 1.875" headers too!
10-28-2013, 10:12 AM
#45
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1st pass out, 10.63 @ 125.5mph with 4.56s and 20 gals of fuel...
10-28-2013, 11:06 AM
#46
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be willing to bet the house on your tune being screwy.
Can you post any excel sheet data logs, with actual AFR, timing, etc..?
My GTO with just longtubes and a tune ran 12.17 @ 115... there's something up somewhere on your setup.
Can you post any excel sheet data logs, with actual AFR, timing, etc..?
My GTO with just longtubes and a tune ran 12.17 @ 115... there's something up somewhere on your setup.
10-28-2013, 11:24 AM
#48
That things really gets to moving! Loving the wrap. I was hopping for ATLEAST a 122 trap, but I suppose being on bias plys at 14# it may have been a 122 trap with radials. Still, I feel it's not right and I believe the heads are to blame.
10-28-2013, 12:10 PM
#50
Yessir, ground around the entire engine. He had 100% of my specs. I know the heads are holding me back, but I'm thinking there might be another issue. The car got slower and slower as the day went on. IAT's were deffinatley thrue the roof.
