Bolt-on A6 Coyote vs Stock A6 C7
#221
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Of course i know this lol, i mean does he do anything else every day of his life other than troll on ls1tech?
But i dont mind posting videos either to show the truth![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
edit/
And before someone goes full retard and says "omg black murr you just jelly of the mighty lsx enjins and ferd nutswinger"
When my 01 ws6 was stock, i got ******* DRUG by an exhaust only Cobra.
But i dont mind posting videos either to show the truth
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
edit/
And before someone goes full retard and says "omg black murr you just jelly of the mighty lsx enjins and ferd nutswinger"
When my 01 ws6 was stock, i got ******* DRUG by an exhaust only Cobra.
#222
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Theres plenty of videos floating around i can post, didnt want to clutter up the thread anymore, but just for you nicky, here ya go.
Heres another fair one, exhaust vs exhaust. Skip to around 1:40
03 Mach 1 vs 04 Cobra vs Ls1 TA - YouTube
03 Cobra Vs LS1 Camaro - YouTube
03 Cobra VS 01 Camaro Street Race - YouTube
Heres another fair one, exhaust vs exhaust. Skip to around 1:40
03 Mach 1 vs 04 Cobra vs Ls1 TA - YouTube
03 Cobra Vs LS1 Camaro - YouTube
03 Cobra VS 01 Camaro Street Race - YouTube
#223
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Of course i know this lol, i mean does he do anything else every day of his life other than troll on ls1tech?
But i dont mind posting videos either to show the truth
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
edit/
And before someone goes full retard and says "omg black murr you just jelly of the mighty lsx enjins and ferd nutswinger"
When my 01 ws6 was stock, i got ******* DRUG by an exhaust only Cobra.
#231
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#233
10 Second Club
#234
10 Second Club
#235
7 Second Club
#237
Teching In
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
About the OHC discussion.
427 SOHC "Cammer"
Not taking sides, I play for both teams.
From Wikipedia. (Easier search, take it or leave it):
The engines were essentially hand-built with racing in mind. Combustion chambers were fully machined to reduce variability. Nevertheless, Ford recommended blueprinting the engines before use in racing applications.[citation needed] With a single four-barrel carburetor they were rated at 616 horsepower (459 kW) at 7,000 rpm & 515 lb·ft (698 N·m) of torque @ 3,800 rpm, and while equipped with dual four-barrel carburetors they made 657 horsepower (490 kW) at 7,500 rpm & 575 lb·ft (780 N·m) of torque @ 4,200 rpm. Ford sold them via the parts counter, the single four-barrel model as part C6AE-6007-363S, the dual carburetor model as part C6AE-6007-359J for $2350.00 (as of October, 1968). Weight of the engine was 680 lb (308 kg).[35]
Ford's hopes were cut short, however. Although Ford sold enough to have the design homologated, NASCAR, after protests by Chrysler Corp., effectively legislated the SOHC engine out of competition.The awaited 1965 SOHC versus Hemi competition at the Daytona 500 season opener never occurred. This was the only engine ever banned from NASCAR. . .
427 SOHC "Cammer"
Not taking sides, I play for both teams.
From Wikipedia. (Easier search, take it or leave it):
The engines were essentially hand-built with racing in mind. Combustion chambers were fully machined to reduce variability. Nevertheless, Ford recommended blueprinting the engines before use in racing applications.[citation needed] With a single four-barrel carburetor they were rated at 616 horsepower (459 kW) at 7,000 rpm & 515 lb·ft (698 N·m) of torque @ 3,800 rpm, and while equipped with dual four-barrel carburetors they made 657 horsepower (490 kW) at 7,500 rpm & 575 lb·ft (780 N·m) of torque @ 4,200 rpm. Ford sold them via the parts counter, the single four-barrel model as part C6AE-6007-363S, the dual carburetor model as part C6AE-6007-359J for $2350.00 (as of October, 1968). Weight of the engine was 680 lb (308 kg).[35]
Ford's hopes were cut short, however. Although Ford sold enough to have the design homologated, NASCAR, after protests by Chrysler Corp., effectively legislated the SOHC engine out of competition.The awaited 1965 SOHC versus Hemi competition at the Daytona 500 season opener never occurred. This was the only engine ever banned from NASCAR. . .
#240
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You want truth ok. Truth is that engine is nice also the truth is the 1970 454 Chevelle SS was rated at 450bhp but dynod almost 700hp at the wheels so technically it really had over 700bhp. Dare to try again? Should we bring in GMs Big blocks vs Fords Big blocks?