MysticA4Z28

And hio is right about mag times being a better comparison...only an ignorant fool would compare cars that ran in different regions/DA's/drivers ect..

Irunelevens

This right here might make Doug change his mind. Even he doesn't want to be associated with anything you say.

MysticA4Z28

y would he change his mind when he's actually thinking LOGICALLY..unlike u

Irunelevens

If you think all of these cars we're talking about don't get run by extremely-experienced owners at tracks like Atco and Englishtown in negative DA, you're out of your mind

MysticA4Z28

hey Einstein it doesnt matter how experienced the owners are or where they were ran at...ur still comparing random times from random days/tracks/DA's/drivers to times from the same driver on the same day...do u hit ur head a lot?

snake95

Did I hurt your feelings, kiddo?

Sickness7

Not 98+ hehe. Old owner ran a 13.5 stock exactly what you see if you google 1999 trans am :p.

MysticA4Z28

no actually u hurt my abdominal muscles from all the laughter that ur inane comments bring

Irunelevens

snake95

You're missing the point.

I'm smarter than that...I know what they run and it sure as hell isn't 14.6 like the link I posted mentioned. My point is HiO uses mag times like gospel, and I debunked the validity of mag times as the Bible for track times by showing an article that tested out f-bodies and running horse **** times with them.

Knowing he's such an f-body ball gargler, I knew he would have to choose between admitting the fact that mag times are not the best indicator, and defending the f-body; naturally he ignores the link I posted because it smashes the credibility of his theory of mag testing.

I don't think mag times are all bogus, they're accurate a little over half the time if you ask me, but I will say the 14.6 in an f-body is 10x more common than the 12 second run.

Irunelevens

And the 12.89 run by Evan Smith was with TONS of practice. Now I personally watched an LS1 T/A run a 12.99 @ 110mph with just a whisper lid and SFCs with a 2.15 60', but that was also run when it was ~45 degrees outside and ~-800DA.

big hammer

i'm jellyfish of these negative DA's.

islander033

Me too. My negative DA is still over 1500ft. lol

big hammer

I was chequing oot gimli.. it's almost 1000' lower than Yorkton. it's around 730'. you should run your car there!

islander033

I think Mission BC is closer to me than Gimli and they are like 100ft elevation.

That is where I should go for a hero pass this next fall or spring.

big hammer

you should go. you'll notice a huge difference. Yorkton is around 900-ish feet higher than where I live and I noticed a difference even from that.

islander033

I agree. The biggest thing keeping me from going is that they have very strict tech and track rules.

Driving 15hours, 1 way, for 1 pass is kinda gay. lol

It'd be worth it if I had some Mexico runs setup for the same trip though.

big hammer

also have to tow the car through the rockies... brown.

islander033

Not that big of a deal with the L9H....as long as I can find a gas station every 300km or so. lol

big hammer

**** that's a good engine!