m5 e60 modded vs camaro magnacharged
12-16-2014, 09:53 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
m5 e60 modded vs camaro magnacharged bmw m5 e60 , smg , modded
camaro ss , manual , full bolt on + camshaft + magnacharger + mantic clutch
first race from 80 km/h
second race from 80 km/h
Trending Topics
12-17-2014, 02:00 PM
#9
Staging Lane
damn that's embarrassing. a stock 5th gen might have done better against that M5. A cam'd/bolton 5th gen should be able to walk it. supercharged should be able to demolish it. And boltons on the M5 don't do much for it powerwise.
Last edited by Sticks n Stones; 12-17-2014 at 03:46 PM.
12-18-2014, 11:17 PM
#10
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a cammed camaro can't even come close to the m5 soon ill be uploading more videos and one of them is versus another camaro but with different mods
12-19-2014, 05:43 AM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
your car, on a hero stockish run, makes 420-435 rwhp. your tune 450ish rwhp. that's pretty good unless the LS3 has even a moderate cam and 475rwhp, or a HERO cam.
if you are full Bolton and tune you are neck and neck in power, but down on torque to a cammed LS3.
be proud of your m5, but dude...for what you paid ITS WEAK.
Last edited by assasinator; 12-19-2014 at 06:03 AM.
12-19-2014, 07:58 AM
#12
you've lost your mind. a cammed LS3 makes more power and weighs less. you just haven't run into one that will trash you.
your car, on a hero stockish run, makes 420-435 rwhp. your tune 450ish rwhp. that's pretty good unless the LS3 has even a moderate cam and 475rwhp, or a HERO cam.
if you are full Bolton and tune you are neck and neck in power, but down on torque to a cammed LS3.
be proud of your m5, but dude...for what you paid ITS WEAK.
your car, on a hero stockish run, makes 420-435 rwhp. your tune 450ish rwhp. that's pretty good unless the LS3 has even a moderate cam and 475rwhp, or a HERO cam.
if you are full Bolton and tune you are neck and neck in power, but down on torque to a cammed LS3.
be proud of your m5, but dude...for what you paid ITS WEAK.
12-19-2014, 08:32 AM
#13
Staging Lane
As for your mods? We both know you don't get much of anything from them as the car is tapped out from the factory.
12-19-2014, 01:24 PM
#14
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah... unless he bought the car new, those things are cheap nowadays considering you get a DCT and a revvin' V10. Had a chance to talk to a turbo V8 M5 owner at the track in November. He used to have the older V10 version before he traded it in on the new one. He said the V8 turbo is the better car, but he missed the "screaming V10" in his old one. It was decently fast around the track considering how heavy the car is, but he only took it out once - he was more occupied racing his Ariel Atom!
12-19-2014, 01:35 PM
#15
Yeah... unless he bought the car new, those things are cheap nowadays considering you get a DCT and a revvin' V10. Had a chance to talk to a turbo V8 M5 owner at the track in November. He used to have the older V10 version before he traded it in on the new one. He said the V8 turbo is the better car, but he missed the "screaming V10" in his old one. It was decently fast around the track considering how heavy the car is, but he only took it out once - he was more occupied racing his Ariel Atom!
12-19-2014, 01:38 PM
#16
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-19-2014, 01:55 PM
#18
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Around the same speed with both good drivers stock for stock. But it is kind of stupid that there is a modified c63 amg in the city at the moment for 35 grand with 90000km on the thing. If a GXP comes to the city no matter the mileage the base price is around 34g For what you get out of the two cars the c63 is the obvious choice but hell since 2010 my screen saver on my pc is a GXP lmfao.
12-22-2014, 06:21 PM
#19
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you've lost your mind. a cammed LS3 makes more power and weighs less. you just haven't run into one that will trash you.
your car, on a hero stockish run, makes 420-435 rwhp. your tune 450ish rwhp. that's pretty good unless the LS3 has even a moderate cam and 475rwhp, or a HERO cam.
if you are full Bolton and tune you are neck and neck in power, but down on torque to a cammed LS3.
be proud of your m5, but dude...for what you paid ITS WEAK.
your car, on a hero stockish run, makes 420-435 rwhp. your tune 450ish rwhp. that's pretty good unless the LS3 has even a moderate cam and 475rwhp, or a HERO cam.
if you are full Bolton and tune you are neck and neck in power, but down on torque to a cammed LS3.
be proud of your m5, but dude...for what you paid ITS WEAK.
12-22-2014, 06:22 PM
#20
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry but that M5 stock runs the 1/4 mile in the 115-118mph range. Bolton LS3 cars run close to that, and cammed ones easily run that. Hell a stock 392 SRT8 would probably be door to door with you.
As for your mods? We both know you don't get much of anything from them as the car is tapped out from the factory.
As for your mods? We both know you don't get much of anything from them as the car is tapped out from the factory.