H/C/I 5.7 CTS-V vs Cammed E85 FBO CJ Coyote
#1
H/C/I 5.7 CTS-V vs Cammed E85 FBO CJ Coyote
Both cars had 1 passenger. My cars running like **** pig rich with fouled br7ef plugs I'm changing today and bad exhaust leak.... well the rear end broke the same night on street tires on 1-2 shift on asphalt and its still broken lol.
#3
i really wasn't happy with the race didn't really conclude anything for a 40-110 mph race lol, his 4th goes to 120 or so mine goes to 140, normally he pulls half a car to 120 and goes into 5th then i come back around and fender him out to 140. but we were limited for room due to shutdown room
#6
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice runs considering the problems, was you exhaust leak causing a false lean and dumping fuel which fouled the plugs maby? And sorry about the rear, it was prob on the to do list, running that power and flogging it, was bound to happen. Hope you get it back out soon.
#7
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Time for a CS 8.8 rear then you can dig race to your hearts content lol. Btw the 5.0 needs a better driver he ever get a real tune yet for those 1200 dollar cams ?
https://creative-steel.com/shop/04-0...e-of-upgrades/
https://creative-steel.com/shop/04-0...e-of-upgrades/
Trending Topics
#13
TECH Apprentice
You guys are a good match for one another that's for sure. I just got recommended a br7ef plug to run in my 383 on E85. We will see how it works out this week. Tuning starts today.
#14
#16
#17
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have any track times for you 5.0? Prob a pretty stout car. I see you are northeast I am in sothern N.H. are you close at all?
#18
clearly cammed coyotes are dyno queens unless they are gutted
#20
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
Stout, lol. I took out the spare, rear seat, and have a lighter muffler setup. Rest of the car is stock. I suppose the DS helped too.
It is when you're cam(s) only in a 5 liter. +50 over your typical H/C/I LS1 setup.
Of what exactly?
Nope, no time, but the motor will be in a track car very, very, soon. It should be a bit lighter and auto. Car will probably make passes at Lebanon Valley.
Spare, rear seats, mufflers and DS ain't gutted. When you start with a 3700lb Premium, there's your problem. This is a base that weighed 34xx-3500 stock.
Maybe with no gas in it. Lightest base gt I've seen is a tick over 3520 with 1/2 tank.That weight number with the mods you listed is more comical than "tune only" 5.0's going 117 lmfao.
? You mean the driveshaft vibration? Yea, that was taken care of a while ago. I think you're confusing me with my buddy's S/C 5.0 that had an issue after his 3.73 install.
It is when you're cam(s) only in a 5 liter. +50 over your typical H/C/I LS1 setup.
Of what exactly?
Nope, no time, but the motor will be in a track car very, very, soon. It should be a bit lighter and auto. Car will probably make passes at Lebanon Valley.
Spare, rear seats, mufflers and DS ain't gutted. When you start with a 3700lb Premium, there's your problem. This is a base that weighed 34xx-3500 stock.
Maybe with no gas in it. Lightest base gt I've seen is a tick over 3520 with 1/2 tank.That weight number with the mods you listed is more comical than "tune only" 5.0's going 117 lmfao.
? You mean the driveshaft vibration? Yea, that was taken care of a while ago. I think you're confusing me with my buddy's S/C 5.0 that had an issue after his 3.73 install.
Congrats on downplaying your weight reduction as well, dont worry everyone does it, but it is pretty comical.
Last edited by redbird555; 09-25-2015 at 04:43 AM.