The real deal, LS3 vs COYOTE
#28
On The Tree
The displacement thing is *always* a big argument with this ****. The LS with its simplicity fits more cubes in a smaller package. 5.0 gives up some cubes for those fancy 4 valve heads. It's a trade off, two different ways to make the power, and it is absolutely pointless for the 5.bros to complain about displacement or the LS crew to complain about valves and cams. Jeez.
#36
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Well, what I got out of them putting that piece of information in, is that if the ci of the motors were the same, than the Coyote would have made more due to more hp/ci. I think that is what they were hinting at. Hence the reason for my post above.
edit: I know that is some ricer bs, btw
edit: I know that is some ricer bs, btw
Another question......the ls3 heads flow more than the coyote heads. So how would it even make the ls3 hp in this test with the same displacement?
#39
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
It's called bore spacing and deck height. They did about all they could to get 5.2 out of it. Those engines are already getting working pretty hard and they have to run 100k+ miles. In oe form especially they have to be more than hp/tq makers.
#40
Yea i lol'd at that. They said that to make the furd guys feel better. So tell me if you use the same heads.....the same cam where is the extra power coming from?
Another question......the ls3 heads flow more than the coyote heads. So how would it even make the ls3 hp in this test with the same displacement?
Another question......the ls3 heads flow more than the coyote heads. So how would it even make the ls3 hp in this test with the same displacement?