Cam only 5th gen vs FBO mustang II
08-08-2016, 08:24 AM
#4
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: St Louis, MO.
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11.85 @116.xx with 2.73's and fat tune. 11.67 @117.xx with 3.42's and tune in check full weight, spare tire and all.
Edit: it was full exhaust, cam, and stall. Everything else was stock, so I honestly don't know what it would run if it were fbo. I wish I had tried though now because I miss being na.
Edit: it was full exhaust, cam, and stall. Everything else was stock, so I honestly don't know what it would run if it were fbo. I wish I had tried though now because I miss being na.
Trending Topics
08-09-2016, 02:23 PM
#13
11.85 @116.xx with 2.73's and fat tune. 11.67 @117.xx with 3.42's and tune in check full weight, spare tire and all.
Edit: it was full exhaust, cam, and stall. Everything else was stock, so I honestly don't know what it would run if it were fbo. I wish I had tried though now because I miss being na.
Edit: it was full exhaust, cam, and stall. Everything else was stock, so I honestly don't know what it would run if it were fbo. I wish I had tried though now because I miss being na.
08-09-2016, 02:40 PM
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: St Louis, MO.
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I'm not sure why that came up to be honest? I play guitar so I was just being silly with the out of tune comment for the car not performing right lol
08-09-2016, 05:08 PM
#20
I love both ford and GM and owned and raced both I just think its funny the hate the 5.0 gets on here. I know my 14' 5.0 tune only raped my bolt on 00' firehawk every time.
Now on the other hand when im done with a proper H/C/I setup on my new weekend lsx car it will represent how a 18 year old car/platform can still hold its own impressively in todays age.