383ci GTO vs 3mod 5.0
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
383ci GTO vs 3mod 5.0
Older vid of my car cuz it still isn't done and I miss racing.
GTO: Patriot heads (compression bump), Cam (don't know specs don't care), 383ci stroker, longtubes, intake, DR's
My car: Boss, X pipe, Lund tune, stock 19" wheels/235 all seasons.
GTO: Patriot heads (compression bump), Cam (don't know specs don't care), 383ci stroker, longtubes, intake, DR's
My car: Boss, X pipe, Lund tune, stock 19" wheels/235 all seasons.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Enthusiast
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
Ultra light billet rods, forgings throughout. Moderate lift high duration solid cam. Tec
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
[QUOTE=assasinator;19385659]Not put cking on you....but t why the cathedral ports on a block that can take rectangulars? Torque? I think about it more and more to build a ls that would make REAL POWER. If i built a small inch id use 862's, but not. Bigger inch build.
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
If you're asking about my build, the reason I run these 862's on my setup is because it's what I had on the old LS1 when it blew up. Cam and crank were toast, but heads were fine, so I reused them since I was on a budget, and a iron block 6.0 was my cheapest option
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
If you're asking about my build, the reason I run these 862's on my setup is because it's what I had on the old LS1 when it blew up. Cam and crank were toast, but heads were fine, so I reused them since I was on a budget, and a iron block 6.0 was my cheapest option
#13
TECH Apprentice
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Duration and heads work fixes curtain losses.
Im talking 250-260 @ .050. If f you have inches more duration solid.
#15
TECH Enthusiast
[QUOTE=HCI2000SS;19385676] Cool. They are good heads
Not put cking on you....but t why the cathedral ports on a block that can take rectangulars? Torque? I think about it more and more to build a ls that would make REAL POWER. If i built a small inch id use 862's, but not. Bigger inch build.
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
If you're asking about my build, the reason I run these 862's on my setup is because it's what I had on the old LS1 when it blew up. Cam and crank were toast, but heads were fine, so I reused them since I was on a budget, and a iron block 6.0 was my cheapest option
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
If you're asking about my build, the reason I run these 862's on my setup is because it's what I had on the old LS1 when it blew up. Cam and crank were toast, but heads were fine, so I reused them since I was on a budget, and a iron block 6.0 was my cheapest option
#16
TECH Enthusiast
My advice he followed mostly. I never got around to tunng it for him. He retired
#17
TECH Enthusiast
You are fast. Im just picking. Im not a fan of lot,of things in my car. Im making it what it should have been factory. I cant run it to its potential because the drivetrain sucks. My 96 feels like a mustang. Fits like a glove. Like a fighter cockpit.
#18
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Not put cking on you....but t why the cathedral ports on a block that can take rectangulars? Torque? I think about it more and more to build a ls that would make REAL POWER. If i built a small inch id use 862's, but not. Bigger inch build.
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
Ultra light billet rods, forgings throughout. Moderate lift high duration solid cam. Tec
If i built ANY LS, it would be a 7500-8500 rpm monster.
The last chevy i built liked 7700 rpms
Ultra light billet rods, forgings throughout. Moderate lift high duration solid cam. Tec
That was one say 383 right there. To put that 383 in perspective it got pulled by a 12sec car.
#20
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Not on those 235 all seasons. ......you were on a drag pak right. Hence 12sec car. And mid 7s would be like 7.5~ .....you didn't run a 7.5 if i remember right yoyr times were similar to the lbo ls1 i drove.
To put this in more perspective. ....its stupid has like a 116 trap. So to show what the pile of poo that 383 was it would be lucky to run 112.
To put this in more perspective. ....its stupid has like a 116 trap. So to show what the pile of poo that 383 was it would be lucky to run 112.