Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

14' 5.0 vs 5G SS 1LE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2016, 01:50 PM
  #461  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can respect guys like Cman who want to push the car NA, but for me and most, cost effectiveness is to slap a blower or a turbo or two on it and let it eat
Old 09-23-2016, 01:50 PM
  #462  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
Mike didn't race a red c6z not long ago and beat him up fairly good from a dig. Car was weird though, trapped slower than me and he had intake and tune.

I'm just saying also that tuner looks like he knows how to tune e85. Unless I'm really bad at math that's way more than 9hp
What is the tuner name? All of us are switching tomorrow
Old 09-23-2016, 02:01 PM
  #463  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Idk could probably find the post on fb though.
Old 09-23-2016, 03:17 PM
  #464  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Jay z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
I can respect guys like Cman who want to push the car NA, but for me and most, cost effectiveness is to slap a blower or a turbo or two on it and let it eat
Boost ftw!
Old 09-23-2016, 03:29 PM
  #465  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Bros are crazy with boost.
Old 09-23-2016, 04:49 PM
  #466  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Name:  F0638B35-32DF-44BC-BE84-98198EBC8CA3_zpsbrgbwn78.jpg
Views: 20
Size:  149.9 KB
Old 09-23-2016, 04:59 PM
  #467  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Holy f##$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 09-23-2016, 05:14 PM
  #468  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Lmaooo
Old 09-23-2016, 05:45 PM
  #469  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corysmach1
Not one car posting in here is full weight. Who cares? Who cares what fuel you run? Like Dennis said run what ya brung nobody cares. Go as fast as you can with what you have.
Because that was what was claimed, said full weight. Also my car is full weight jack, spare and all
Old 09-23-2016, 05:57 PM
  #470  
11 Second Club
 
sxc Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 445
Received 88 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
End this thread now lol
Old 09-23-2016, 06:59 PM
  #471  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Im convincing her to buy a old shelby.
Get at least 2011-.... obviously preferrably 13-14. But 11-12 is a good platform for a TVS swap. Stay away from the 07-09s
Old 09-23-2016, 07:00 PM
  #472  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
Mike didn't race a red c6z not long ago and beat him up fairly good from a dig. Car was weird though, trapped slower than me and he had intake and tune.

I'm just saying also that tuner looks like he knows how to tune e85. Unless I'm really bad at math that's way more than 9hp
I think the 93 octane dyno pull is off actually... 457 with stage 3 cams is on the low side. Perhaps he did more fine tuning with the tune with e85 other than just timing bumps etc.
Old 09-23-2016, 07:37 PM
  #473  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Get at least 2011-.... obviously preferrably 13-14. But 11-12 is a good platform for a TVS swap. Stay away from the 07-09s
Price difference of the 07-09 you can do a **** ton of mods on. Then again, it is for his wife, so maybe little to no mods done. In that case I recommend a newer one as well
Old 09-23-2016, 10:11 PM
  #474  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer


Nice touch on the glove!
Old 09-23-2016, 10:29 PM
  #475  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Get at least 2011-.... obviously preferrably 13-14. But 11-12 is a good platform for a TVS swap. Stay away from the 07-09s
Really even the 09s?
Old 09-23-2016, 10:30 PM
  #476  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Price difference of the 07-09 you can do a **** ton of mods on. Then again, it is for his wife, so maybe little to no mods done. In that case I recommend a newer one as well
Yes, bolt on power if anything. Not my car forsure her toy.
Old 09-23-2016, 10:47 PM
  #477  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Long stoke small bore raises volumetric efficiency. The issue there lies in having a good enough head to feed it. That's where the 4v coyote head comes in. A longer stroke will take a head to its choking point faster than a shorter stroke even at the same CI. FWIW the coyote actually has a little more stroke than an ls3

Problem with fords DOHC layout is the pewp bore spacing which is extremely CI limiting. There's blocks now supposedly where you can get 400 CI out of a coyote but with the stroke length needed for that you'll need a much better head than a stock coyote casting to feed it properly.

In the end I would agree that the ls3 head layout is superior for maximum hp due to its high CSA and ability to feed a larger engine. Ported ls3 heads flow bętter than ported ls3 castings.

Both are good engine but two different roads to a similar destination. But in the end NA the ls3 is just more capable
Thanks Hammer for the educated explanation. Yes there is now a few blocks out for the Coyote that seem to make very good power. As far as the LS3 being better I think me and you are about to find out . I think we should be 100% honest about are builds and let the better setup win. Max effort SBE shootout. I know we have already talked about this but I think it's gonna be insanely close.
Old 09-23-2016, 10:48 PM
  #478  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
I can respect guys like Cman who want to push the car NA, but for me and most, cost effectiveness is to slap a blower or a turbo or two on it and let it eat
Thanks man. Your literally one of the few that respect what I am doing. My car and build gets hated on 24/7. Coyotes fail NA,. They need boost....for that money you could go 8s I have heard it all. It's crazy how bad you get hated on for wanting to be different.
Old 09-23-2016, 10:53 PM
  #479  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Really even the 09s?
The 07-09s are heavier.. there were also many upgrades in 2011-2012... aluminum block, more power, susoension etc. If she is just looking for a driver and you dont plan on making a speed demon put of it, then the older ones will be fine. My suggestion is to test drive some 07-09s and some 2011-2012s. You can also check out www.fordgt500.com forums. Good info there.
Old 09-23-2016, 11:53 PM
  #480  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by corysmach1
Doug-. I am not being a smartass at all when I ask this because nobody can seem to answer it. Why do Coyotes make such good power if they have no cubes and the heads aren't great compared to LS3?
Looks like hammer covered it well for you. I will add that a coyote is a pretty aggressive engine vs a ls3 in a stock vs stock form. It's why you see a 30~ hp or so gains with a set of cams in a coyite vs 60-80 with a ls3. The coyote has 4v per cyl and vvti to help offset it's smaller displacement.

Coyotes are fine engines. Will they keep up na with a ls3?? Nope......the great part is the ls stuff isn't limited to ls3 stuff. There is ls7 stuff and if one wanted to get really aggressive with a build dr ls heads. They'll flow 100 more cfm than coyote heads. Combine that with the ability to tailor the ls bottom end to the flow capacity of the head there is a deficit the coyote just can't overcome. Especially when cost is involved.

The greatest thing the coyote did was being furds first mass produced engine capable of making 400+whp na with bolt ons. The ls family has been doin that since 2002. Hell i bet even a 01 ls6 would that. For sure the ls2 would...the ls3 does....the ls7 well over 500whp. **** i think i can get to 450whp on pump and make more tq. This is why I'm kinda hohum about them. Don't mean they are bad.....just late to the party.


Originally Posted by big hammer
Long stoke small bore raises volumetric efficiency. The issue there lies in having a good enough head to feed it. That's where the 4v coyote head comes in. A longer stroke will take a head to its choking point faster than a shorter stroke even at the same CI. FWIW the coyote actually has a little more stroke than an ls3

Problem with fords DOHC layout is the pewp bore spacing which is extremely CI limiting. There's blocks now supposedly where you can get 400 CI out of a coyote but with the stroke length needed for that you'll need a much better head than a stock coyote casting to feed it properly.

In the end I would agree that the ls3 head layout is superior for maximum hp due to its high CSA and ability to feed a larger engine. Ported ls3 heads flow bętter than ported ls3 castings.

Both are good engine but two different roads to a similar destination. But in the end NA the ls3 is just more capable
Good poast


Quick Reply: 14' 5.0 vs 5G SS 1LE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.