Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

14' 5.0 vs 5G SS 1LE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2016, 01:24 AM
  #481  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Looks like hammer covered it well for you. I will add that a coyote is a pretty aggressive engine vs a ls3 in a stock vs stock form. It's why you see a 30~ hp or so gains with a set of cams in a coyite vs 60-80 with a ls3. The coyote has 4v per cyl and vvti to help offset it's smaller displacement.

Coyotes are fine engines. Will they keep up na with a ls3?? Nope......the great part is the ls stuff isn't limited to ls3 stuff. There is ls7 stuff and if one wanted to get really aggressive with a build dr ls heads. They'll flow 100 more cfm than coyote heads. Combine that with the ability to tailor the ls bottom end to the flow capacity of the head there is a deficit the coyote just can't overcome. Especially when cost is involved.

The greatest thing the coyote did was being furds first mass produced engine capable of making 400+whp na with bolt ons. The ls family has been doin that since 2002. Hell i bet even a 01 ls6 would that. For sure the ls2 would...the ls3 does....the ls7 well over 500whp. **** i think i can get to 450whp on pump and make more tq. This is why I'm kinda hohum about them. Don't mean they are bad.....just late to the party.




Good poast
I disagree with basically all of that but I guess we will find out.
Old 09-24-2016, 07:12 AM
  #482  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

It's already been found out. Nothing to disagree with with.
Old 09-24-2016, 07:24 AM
  #483  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZYBORG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
HAHAHAHAHA. Head shot!
Old 09-24-2016, 07:45 AM
  #484  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corysmach1
Thanks man. Your literally one of the few that respect what I am doing. My car and build gets hated on 24/7. Coyotes fail NA,. They need boost....for that money you could go 8s I have heard it all. It's crazy how bad you get hated on for wanting to be different.
Different strokes for different folks man
Old 09-24-2016, 08:44 AM
  #485  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
It's already been found out. Nothing to disagree with with.
Chevylabs literally showed me nothing I didn't even read it. I know Hammers goals we will see what happens.
Old 09-24-2016, 11:09 AM
  #486  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

What would peeps have don different than engine Labs to make up the 100 hp deficit
Old 09-24-2016, 03:09 PM
  #487  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

That's a good question......lol Nawz man......they would use nawz

Will await for coyote guys answer.

It's not like the ls3 was anywhere near tapped either. That was about as standard as you can do a ls3. I would've liked to have seen them use stock ls3 heads on the engine labs build. But it would have still easily out powered the coyote.
Old 09-24-2016, 04:13 PM
  #488  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
I think the 93 octane dyno pull is off actually... 457 with stage 3 cams is on the low side. Perhaps he did more fine tuning with the tune with e85 other than just timing bumps etc.
Car was an auto 460whp is about right with pump and cams
Old 09-24-2016, 04:16 PM
  #489  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
That's a good question......lol Nawz man......they would use nawz

Will await for coyote guys answer.

It's not like the ls3 was anywhere near tapped either. That was about as standard as you can do a ls3. I would've liked to have seen them use stock ls3 heads on the engine labs build. But it would have still easily out powered the coyote.
That's was a **** built ls3 so it baffles me why coyote guys are compeaining about their engine. Could have used a pull out ls3 instead of a new block then got a set of MAST heads fast intake and a decent sized cam and easily made another 100 hp or more
Old 09-24-2016, 04:50 PM
  #490  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ls3 better NA and Coyote better with boost cost effectiveness wise.
Old 09-24-2016, 05:05 PM
  #491  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
That's was a **** built ls3 so it baffles me why coyote guys are compeaining about their engine. Could have used a pull out ls3 instead of a new block then got a set of MAST heads fast intake and a decent sized cam and easily made another 100 hp or more
Very easy!

Just like your super duper LS7 trapping 123.x.
Old 09-24-2016, 07:24 PM
  #492  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by islander033
Very easy!

Just like your super duper LS7 trapping 123.x.
Man I should be renting out the real estate my cars occupy in your mind. Pretty good for a stock car in 1800 da though I agree
Old 09-24-2016, 07:55 PM
  #493  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Yup...what did islander gt100 trap stock?
Old 09-24-2016, 07:56 PM
  #494  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Ls3 better NA and Coyote better with boost cost effectiveness wise.
Still waiting for someone to explain how a coyote is better with boost.
Old 09-24-2016, 07:59 PM
  #495  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
That's was a **** built ls3 so it baffles me why coyote guys are compeaining about their engine. Could have used a pull out ls3 instead of a new block then got a set of MAST heads fast intake and a decent sized cam and easily made another 100 hp or more
Yea....if they got ultimate serious about both egines the gap would only get wider.
Old 09-24-2016, 08:28 PM
  #496  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Still waiting for someone to explain how a coyote is better with boost.
I think for its CI it does pretty good, but better?
I know there is alot more to it, but my car on 6-7psi made 550 whp and 550 torque SAE through a unlocked 3600 stall. It's essential a ls3 with a 78mm turbo that falls on its face at 6k.
I wonder what a br0 would do with the same amount of air?
And even compare it to a 4.8 with the same air as well at only 293 ci, some guys get pretty good power.
Old 09-24-2016, 08:39 PM
  #497  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
Man I should be renting out the real estate my cars occupy in your mind. Pretty good for a stock car in 1800 da though I agree
Calm down man. I was giving you a compliment. It is easy to trap 123.x with your car if you did it first night out.

Damn...Y'all really are a sensitive bunch of delicate vaginas. Wow and lol
Old 09-24-2016, 09:03 PM
  #498  
Teching In
 
BlkMach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S. Fla.
Posts: 36
Received 115 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 408-99-f
I think for its CI it does pretty good, but better?
I know there is alot more to it, but my car on 6-7psi made 550 whp and 550 torque SAE through a unlocked 3600 stall. It's essential a ls3 with a 78mm turbo that falls on its face at 6k.
I wonder what a br0 would do with the same amount of air?
And even compare it to a 4.8 with the same air as well at only 293 ci, some guys get pretty good power.
I did a bit of searching, same 2300 TVS bolt on kit on LS3 5G and coyote, I noticed coyotes were making more power. Not sure why, elevation, tuners, dyno, etc. but Hio said it was unfair for both motors being pumped by the blower.

I love both motors, shame is so expensive to put cams on a coyote.
Old 09-24-2016, 09:23 PM
  #499  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
That's a good question......lol Nawz man......they would use nawz

Will await for coyote guys answer.

It's not like the ls3 was anywhere near tapped either. That was about as standard as you can do a ls3. I would've liked to have seen them use stock ls3 heads on the engine labs build. But it would have still easily out powered the coyote.
Like I said I did t even read it....even the lsx guys here said it was retarded. Here as in here around me. Damn so according to DB the ls3 would have won by 200 hp. You guys are awesome. Should open your own shop....be millionaires.
Old 09-24-2016, 09:36 PM
  #500  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

You don't feed to diffetent engines the same amount of air. For christ sakes gmc knew this in the early 1900s. You feed them the air they want. You don't feed a na engine any air. It sucks the amount it wants.

In the engine labs challange for instance the ls3 made like 80 more hp. Now if you run both those engines at 15psi of boost at equal efficiency in theory baring pumping loses or losses due to heat it will double their power.

At what point does the coyote make up any ground?


Quick Reply: 14' 5.0 vs 5G SS 1LE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.