2016 Corvette Stingray vs Coyote Mustangs
#103
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your argument makes no sense at all. More ethanol more power.
You should be tuned for max timing at 85% and adjusted down from that point. Doesn't matter what engine it is. You are leaving power on the table if you are at max timing at 60% ethanol.
I think you would argue if the sky was blue if I said so. This argument is really something special.
#105
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wrong. Different gains yes. But both will gain the more ethanol content. I really cant believe you are arguing this.
Your argument makes no sense at all. More ethanol more power.
You should be tuned for max timing at 85% and adjusted down from that point. Doesn't matter what engine it is. You are leaving power on the table if you are at max timing at 60% ethanol.
I think you would argue if the sky was blue if I said so. This argument is really something special.
Your argument makes no sense at all. More ethanol more power.
You should be tuned for max timing at 85% and adjusted down from that point. Doesn't matter what engine it is. You are leaving power on the table if you are at max timing at 60% ethanol.
I think you would argue if the sky was blue if I said so. This argument is really something special.
![Punch](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_punch.gif)
#106
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You bros have said many times in the past dedicated was worth more NOT ME.
I said the opposite. You argued that as well. Just today or yesterday. Or maybe it was your sidekick LMAO. I think it was both actually.
whatever fits the narrative I guess
If you are at max timing at e60 you are missing some hp. But hey think whatever you want. Adding 25% more ethanol to the tank wont do anything for timing advance and resistance to knock. Got to be an idiot to think that. Gosh and what about all these idiots running e98 with even better results? damn you should just tell everyone how it is I guess. bunch of idiots compared to you.
#108
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guy just got flex figured out too. He's putting together a kit soon.
He got 38 rwhp over his 93 tune with a full tank of full e85. Although he did add a rotofab after the pump tune. Still impressive. And hopefully the roto fab was worth a little still waiting on more results. So far all the CAI have been fail
#109
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed.
Guy just got flex figured out too. He's putting together a kit soon.
He got 38 rwhp over his 93 tune with a full tank of full e85. Although he did add a rotofab after the pump tune. Still impressive. And hopefully the roto fab was worth a little still waiting on more results. So far all the CAI have been fail
Guy just got flex figured out too. He's putting together a kit soon.
He got 38 rwhp over his 93 tune with a full tank of full e85. Although he did add a rotofab after the pump tune. Still impressive. And hopefully the roto fab was worth a little still waiting on more results. So far all the CAI have been fail
#112
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[QUOTE=Theblacknightls1;19409015]So what 5bros run 10s NA. I've seen some with a power adder run 10s/11s. I havnt see any run 10s NA.
[/QUOTE
Hoping for 10's around 130 this fall. We will see. Hope it works out....if so low 10's at 135+ spring of '17.]
![Mullet](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/mullet.gif)
Hoping for 10's around 130 this fall. We will see. Hope it works out....if so low 10's at 135+ spring of '17.]
#118