Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Cobra gets beat by Nissan SUV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2018, 01:34 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dirty D, CA
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Cobra gets beat by Nissan SUV

this is embarrassing
Old 06-03-2018, 02:13 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Nismo Juke is a 15.0@95 car bone stock and bolt on's/tune will really wake them up, plus a roll favors the FWD turbo car. On top of that, they don't make 3.90 gears for the Cobra, so it's likely a 3.73.
Old 06-03-2018, 02:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: White Bear, Mn
Posts: 3,890
Received 345 Likes on 237 Posts

Default

**** those were some ugly cars.

That 5.0 vs 370z race was over before it started and could of been settled playing grand turismo.
Just cause it looks fast does not mean it is. Ask the scion frs crowd lol
Old 06-03-2018, 02:16 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Nismo Juke is a 15.0@95 car bone stock and bolt on's/tune will really wake them up, plus a roll favors the FWD turbo car. On top of that, they don't make 3.90 gears for the Cobra, so it's likely a 3.73.
Also, are you really going to try and defend the 4V?
Old 06-03-2018, 02:31 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
Also, are you really going to try and defend the 4V?
Juke would have had the same outcome vs an LT1 Fbody, do you consider the Fbody to be an embarrassment? Most any modern turbo car will be a threat to a mostly stock NA cobra or LT1 Fbody. No shame, just built in different eras.
Old 06-03-2018, 06:02 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ouch, that one hurt...thanks Nick lol. Also JC, I thought motive made 3.90 rear gears for the 8.8?
Old 06-03-2018, 06:07 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turdinator
Ouch, that one hurt...thanks Nick lol. Also JC, I thought motive made 3.90 rear gears for the 8.8?
I stand corrected. Most just run the 4.10.
Old 06-03-2018, 06:11 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
I stand corrected. Most just run the 4.10.
Yeah, I know went with 4.10s or 3.73s in all my previous mustangs because you couldn't get FRPP 3.90s, but motive had you covered if you were willing.
Old 06-03-2018, 06:20 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

most run any gear they want. there are a myriad of gear ratios for the 8.8 ford.

2.26, 2.47, 2.73, 3.08, 3.27, 3.31, 3.45, 3.55, 3.73, 4.10 & 4.56, 4.88, 5.14

look, a terbo will beat anything. its the terbo winning, not the vehicle.

is it an embarrassment to lose to a 900fwhp civic? teh cobro is dated tech. he and all the rest of the cobro crowd need to follow DD's example. put a 99,01 cobro intake on it or just a cover and TB elbow.

Last edited by assasinator; 06-03-2018 at 06:37 PM.
Old 06-03-2018, 06:22 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Good races...You could see the Juke fall back on the top end even though it ran hard down low. I am sure the boost is also turned up with the tune on that Juke.
Old 06-04-2018, 07:32 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
fst100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lancaster, pa
Posts: 1,161
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

surprised on how close the race was with the juke. also shorter gears on a 370z wakes them up from a dig/slow roll. there's a few vids of one running and winning against some decent higher powered vehicles you wouldn't think would happen. I think it had like 4.10 or 4.30 gears?
Old 06-04-2018, 01:17 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Juke would have had the same outcome vs an LT1 Fbody, do you consider the Fbody to be an embarrassment? Most any modern turbo car will be a threat to a mostly stock NA cobra or LT1 Fbody. No shame, just built in different eras.
LT1 embarrassed the n/a cobra, heck the TPI would beat it stop light to stop light.
Old 06-04-2018, 03:45 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
2003Cobro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 9
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Stock cobra should be a high 13 car. Id still be willing to bet a lot of those 96-98 Cobra have IMRC issues. Back in 06 my buddies 98 Cobra all of a sudden went from high 12s to mid 13s. Car ran just fine we werent sure what was up with it. Found out his IMRC motor died. Which leaves them shut and kills power on the cars bad. They are supposed to open at 3250rpm to open more flow to the head. His car had low miles too.
Old 06-04-2018, 05:33 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
LT1 embarrassed the n/a cobra, heck the TPI would beat it stop light to stop light.
Lets youtube race here, this is every video I can find of a B head cobra vs an LT1. Cobra goes 4-0. Not seeing the embarrassment.





Originally Posted by 2003Cobro
Stock cobra should be a high 13 car. Id still be willing to bet a lot of those 96-98 Cobra have IMRC issues. Back in 06 my buddies 98 Cobra all of a sudden went from high 12s to mid 13s. Car ran just fine we werent sure what was up with it. Found out his IMRC motor died. Which leaves them shut and kills power on the cars bad. They are supposed to open at 3250rpm to open more flow to the head. His car had low miles too.
Yup. They're royal turds with the IMRC's stuck.
Old 06-04-2018, 06:31 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
LT1 embarrassed the n/a cobra, heck the TPI would beat it stop light to stop light.


no they didn't. the cobro owned the lt1 and put trains on tpi cars. im sure at 4 years old you remember it well *******.
Old 06-05-2018, 12:48 AM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You 2 fairies need to post your own n/a 4V timeslips instead of youtube racing. I'll wait.
Old 06-05-2018, 01:34 AM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CyberGrey Z28
You 2 fairies need to post your own n/a 4V timeslips instead of youtube racing. I'll wait.
14.3@99 on a hot, humid day in Texas, with a 175K mile car. Had an off road pipe and heavy 04 cobra wheels. Right there with an LT1 fbody, tick slower with terrible conditions and a terrible driver.
Old 06-05-2018, 07:54 AM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
14.3@99 on a hot, humid day in Texas, with a 175K mile car. Had an off road pipe and heavy 04 cobra wheels. Right there with an LT1 fbody, tick slower with terrible conditions and a terrible driver.
13.9 @ 99 on hot, humid day in FL, with a 148k mile LT1, stock. Had cheap Khumo Ecsta street tires that were the sportiest I could afford on a high school budget. The 4V could sometimes be a driver's race with an LT1 but I would wager the LT1 beats the 4v more times than vice versa. My LT1 never had any issues with any similarly modded NA stang. At least it wasn't a joke like the pre-96 5.0. I've had a lot of funny races with those...they don't make dick for power NA.
Old 06-05-2018, 08:09 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Look at all these furd **** making excuses for why a modded 4v cobra lost to an SUV.

Originally Posted by 2003Cobro
Stock cobra should be a high 13 car. Id still be willing to bet a lot of those 96-98 Cobra have IMRC issues. Back in 06 my buddies 98 Cobra all of a sudden went from high 12s to mid 13s. Car ran just fine we werent sure what was up with it. Found out his IMRC motor died. Which leaves them shut and kills power on the cars bad. They are supposed to open at 3250rpm to open more flow to the head. His car had low miles too.
Originally Posted by JC316
Lets youtube race here, this is every video I can find of a B head cobra vs an LT1. Cobra goes 4-0. Not seeing the embarrassment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm8HERuDlIw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLtuecSeBec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQpP3UJ0eU0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXxFYuMo_tY



Yup. They're royal turds with the IMRC's stuck.
Originally Posted by assasinator
no they didn't. the cobro owned the lt1 and put trains on tpi cars. im sure at 4 years old you remember it well *******.
Old 06-05-2018, 11:17 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

B-head 96-98 cobras handled the old lt1 cars no problem. They were under geared significantly from ford. Gears alone would put them on par with first year ls1 f-bodys.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.