Turbo 2v VS Hellcat
#21
Yep, still a full interior car, heat, the super cool circa 2004 Mach 460 sound system and all, sans a rear seat. Still a cast iron block, would have liked a teskid for it. I don't even have tubular A arms on the car yet, so I can still save a bit of weight on the front.
truly, there is only so much weight it needs to lose. add boost. i think the most boost ive run is 18. i have certainly run that plenty of times. in using a **** on3 76/65 turbo. it works good enough for now.
your car is a first rate build. i try to advocate for terbos. i get picked on for it, but it always gets results. UNLESS its a coyote. i dont like a terbo on a coyote without the compression lowered to 10:1.
Last edited by assasinator; 06-29-2018 at 05:06 PM.
#22
i have all of the tubular stuff and the mach 460. its never going anywhere. full volume no distortion. subwoofer. its awesome.
truly, there is only so much weight it needs to lose. add boost. i think the most boost ive run is 18. i have certainly run that plenty of times. in using a **** on3 76/65 turbo. it works good enough for now.
your car is a first rate build. i try to advocate for terbos. i get picked on for it, but it always gets results. UNLESS its a coyote. i dont like a terbo on a coyote without the compression lowered to 10:1.
truly, there is only so much weight it needs to lose. add boost. i think the most boost ive run is 18. i have certainly run that plenty of times. in using a **** on3 76/65 turbo. it works good enough for now.
your car is a first rate build. i try to advocate for terbos. i get picked on for it, but it always gets results. UNLESS its a coyote. i dont like a terbo on a coyote without the compression lowered to 10:1.
#23
i REALLY want to know what this turbo can do in a all out race mode at the track. its easy to switch it out.
#25
Thanks! Feels good to bring some content back. Past few years have been boring here. Trying to run what I can with this new setup. I have some liter bikes wanting to play, and an HCI/200 shot C6Z that will be playing soon
#27
one of the things i like most about 94-04 mustangs VS corvettes is, there is no weight advanage for the vettes. they have to outpower and out torque your terbo. you dont have to make more power.
i know the vette still has an aero advantage if it's not a wide body. i dont think wide body vettes have a aero advantage.
your stock Cd is .36 a non widebody vette is .28 the Cd of a 96 no spoiler is .32 a widebody has a Cd of .34
Last edited by assasinator; 07-03-2018 at 07:59 PM.
#30
Thanks man!
He out-torques my car, but mine makes 100+ whp on race gas/higher boost. We are going to run vs me on pump gas first. We're about the same power then. And it's a 150 shot car, not 200. I was mistaken.
Thanks!
Here's a pic of the turd
one of the things i like most about 94-04 mustangs VS corvettes is, there is no weight advanage for the vettes. they have to outpower and out torque your terbo. you dont have to make more power.
i know the vette still has an aero advantage if it's not a wide body. i dont think wide body vettes have a aero advantage.
your stock Cd is .36 a non widebody vette is .28 the Cd of a 96 no spoiler is .32 a widebody has a Cd of .34
i know the vette still has an aero advantage if it's not a wide body. i dont think wide body vettes have a aero advantage.
your stock Cd is .36 a non widebody vette is .28 the Cd of a 96 no spoiler is .32 a widebody has a Cd of .34
Thanks!
Here's a pic of the turd
#31
it looks a hell of a lot better than my rusted corroded terbo lol. nice looking car.
#33
That's a purdy red! (Burgandy)
#36
Thanks!
I'm Ron Burgandy...?
Thank you!
Yep. Out of the box TFS 38cc.
I'm Ron Burgandy...?
Yep. Out of the box TFS 38cc.
#38
I love these with the cams I have with them, rev to 7200, it parties pretty hard up top. I'd like to get the heads and intake ported to match and see what it does. It should make close to 900whp on the setup with this turbo on 20+psi,