Need help against a 4.6
#5
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there's a good weight reduction thread somewhere around here, try searching. There's some simple stuff you can do like taking out seats to the more hardcore stuff like pulling your carpet and replacing all your glass with Lexan. Just take out all your glass and buy a kit. You should be set, remember to wear goggles.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by Fbody98
I got a 98 ws6 Formula up against a 4.6 supercharged GT i need a way to bring down my weight and gain acceleration cheap by next thursday any ideas
As for cheap weight saving - how far are you prepared to go? Talking bits of the car is cheap and only requires a bit of time and a few tools but it might make a mess of your car if you get too carried away.
#9
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i heard that gears would blow out my rear the car is a 6 speed what do you guys think?. the mustang has 398 rwhp but the kid cant drive i ran a 13.49 at 106 with minor mods like intake exhaust. he ran a 13.42 at 110
#10
Originally Posted by Fbody98
i heard that gears would blow out my rear the car is a 6 speed what do you guys think?. the mustang has 398 rwhp but the kid cant drive i ran a 13.49 at 106 with minor mods like intake exhaust. he ran a 13.42 at 110
#11
I wouldn't worry about it to much. I raced a Roush Stage 2 with an aftermarket Vortech on it when I had a lid and catback. I pulled 2-3 cars on him from a dig. Unless he is making crazy boost, those 2v really hold them back...now the 4v's, sheesh!
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: seymour indiana
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i think youll be suprised on how close it is with your mods now...but just incase...bottle feed that thing show him whos boss....if your not big into nitrous use it for the one race....go with a small shot like 75...itll be more than enough...if not id say some dr's and make sure your gas gauge is damn nar on E
#13
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You shouldn't need to do anything but drive your car.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
#14
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by COMNBYU
You shouldn't need to do anything but drive your car.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
#16
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bitemark46
Hmmm that's weird. I didn't know that stock LS1's can go low 12's. -Mark
Ha ha, yea and a stock 2v 4.6 with a Paxton is gonna run low 12's...cute.
And FWIW, I can guarantee you if I had had nothing else but a 12blt/9" and a little bit of susp. work my LS1 would have gone .20's easy. I think a jerryrigged CAI and unbolted stock exhaust would be considered "mostly stock".
#17
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by COMNBYU
Ha ha, yea and a stock 2v 4.6 with a Paxton is gonna run low 12's...cute.
I won't tell you what I run, you'l probably have a heart attack. -Mark
#18
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by COMNBYU
You shouldn't need to do anything but drive your car.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
A mildly blown 4.6 with susp, tires, and a driver "might" be able to hang with a stock LS1, but your average stock 4.6 with a blower and young kid behind the wheel isn't anything to fear.
Think abou it, with ~3500-3600lb and 300rwhp a LS1 will do low 13's mostly if driven correctly maybe a high 12 if you're lucky.
A heavier Terminator with 360+rwhp will run high 12's @ 110mph+
So why do you think a LIGHTER car ~3300lb with near 400rwhp won't be a match or indeed faster?
Even a half arsed blower setup on a 99+ sn95 should be making 385rwhp+ but most tend to see 400-420rwhp.
You =
#19
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken the guy said it was a '98 4.6 GT which means less HP than the '99+, please correct me if I'm wrong. Every pre-'99 2v 4.6 I've ever seen/driven = slow, lucky to get 14's stock. So tell me how adding a blower to 14-15 sec car equates to low 12's.
I know the '99+'s aren't "that" bad and have some relative capability, I've seen a few go high 13's fairly stock but all of the older 4.6's are dogs. I guess my statement was kind of broad so for that I appologize. I figured since the original poster mentioned a '98 that anyone reading would assume my 4.6 statement would be relating to pre-'99s.
And as for you 300BPH/TON, I'm not a bench racer so I can't respond to your statement. I wouldn't even know how to approach answering it since I'm not that familiar with it.
EDIT- I just realized the '98 is the TA. What year [is] the GT?
I know the '99+'s aren't "that" bad and have some relative capability, I've seen a few go high 13's fairly stock but all of the older 4.6's are dogs. I guess my statement was kind of broad so for that I appologize. I figured since the original poster mentioned a '98 that anyone reading would assume my 4.6 statement would be relating to pre-'99s.
And as for you 300BPH/TON, I'm not a bench racer so I can't respond to your statement. I wouldn't even know how to approach answering it since I'm not that familiar with it.
EDIT- I just realized the '98 is the TA. What year [is] the GT?