378 rwhp auto C5 vrs bone stock 05 NSX
#61
This is worse than Cobra myths, doesnt anyone here have an NSX to race any LS1 near them. I have a very hard time thinking an NSX will hang with stock C5 ZO6 power level. auto or not. Just doesnt add up to me. Im going to drive around this weekend until I find an NSX, then Im gonna call him all kinds of names and make him race. Ive seen the newest version ( I think ) in red locally.
#62
Originally Posted by LSINA7
Neither. He said Viper. Dude, they handle like **** out the box. You talking about a crazy car to drive when its wet or trying to floor it. I drove one last year and I could get it loose through curves like it was my job.
Saleens? You mean Saleen Mustangs? Please.
Saleens? You mean Saleen Mustangs? Please.
Come now, viper handles like $hit??? Yea....1.0+ g's....that blows.
#63
this thread reminds me of my kill
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=NSX
if that new nsx hold itz ground with your auto C5 then ive must raced the one with a shitty driver..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=NSX
if that new nsx hold itz ground with your auto C5 then ive must raced the one with a shitty driver..
#65
Originally Posted by CTSVSL65AMG
Come now, viper handles like $hit??? Yea....1.0+ g's....that blows.
#67
Sounds to me like the NSX was modded. Are you really positive that it is stock? A guy on another board has a video of him killing an NSX in a Cobalt SS w/ just a CAI. Either something is amiss with your car, or he is modded, and not telling you about it.
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
#68
Originally Posted by JayplaySS2
This is worse than Cobra myths, doesnt anyone here have an NSX to race any LS1 near them. I have a very hard time thinking an NSX will hang with stock C5 ZO6 power level. auto or not. Just doesnt add up to me. Im going to drive around this weekend until I find an NSX, then Im gonna call him all kinds of names and make him race. Ive seen the newest version ( I think ) in red locally.
#69
Originally Posted by Denom
Sounds to me like the NSX was modded. Are you really positive that it is stock? A guy on another board has a video of him killing an NSX in a Cobalt SS w/ just a CAI. Either something is amiss with your car, or he is modded, and not telling you about it.
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
#70
Originally Posted by Denom
Sounds to me like the NSX was modded. Are you really positive that it is stock? A guy on another board has a video of him killing an NSX in a Cobalt SS w/ just a CAI. Either something is amiss with your car, or he is modded, and not telling you about it.
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
I've never raced an NSX though personally, so I can't say if they are fast or slow. I do know that nitrous really helps them out though (They run low 12's with a 100 shot at 115+ mph).
#71
Originally Posted by 2.73 Vette
Well I did some research and found the following stats..
-3100 pounds
-.30 drag
-270 rwhp
-8000 rpm redline
-4.06 gears
-378 rwhp vrs 270-280 rwhp means I have a 1 second advantage
-3100 pounds
-.30 drag
-270 rwhp
-8000 rpm redline
-4.06 gears
-378 rwhp vrs 270-280 rwhp means I have a 1 second advantage
That's 270 FLYwheel horsepower, not 270 REARwheel horsepower. Yes, I know they're factory underrated. Not by that much. The NSX motor is weak, and for a $90,000 car it's a goddam joke. It ought to be f***ing ashamed of itself.
Pffft. $90,000 for 270 hp.
#72
Originally Posted by black_knight
I can't believe I'm touching this thread, but someone has to call him on this:
That's 270 FLYwheel horsepower, not 270 REARwheel horsepower. Yes, I know they're factory underrated. Not by that much. The NSX motor is weak, and for a $90,000 car it's a goddam joke. It ought to be f***ing ashamed of itself.
Pffft. $90,000 for 270 hp.
That's 270 FLYwheel horsepower, not 270 REARwheel horsepower. Yes, I know they're factory underrated. Not by that much. The NSX motor is weak, and for a $90,000 car it's a goddam joke. It ought to be f***ing ashamed of itself.
Pffft. $90,000 for 270 hp.
I agree
#76
Originally Posted by 25psi
You have these redneck loyalist on here, that refuse to believe what where saying.
Redneck's huh? How about we're instead of where.
You have these redneck loyalist on here, that refuse to believe what where saying.
Redneck's huh? How about we're instead of where.
#78
I dunno where some of you guys are getting your data from.... C5 Z06 would pull an nsx friggin hard.... esp from a dig, Ranger ran a 11.7 1/4 in a bone stock, down to the run flats C5 Z06.... And as far as vettes having a shitty hook.... my cai and catback only 99 FRC cut a 1.6 60ft in my first run in it ever in the 1/8