My GTO vs Supra TT question?
08-13-2006, 05:56 PM
#42
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GTO's are heavy and I have seen stock twins do 450+ with cam gears. Lets just say if the supra was on race gas he would need every bit of that 150 shot to stay ahead.
08-13-2006, 11:56 PM
#43
I bet with all those mods the GTO is putting on, with the wet shot, 500+ rwhp should be attainable. From what I've seen guys with the LS2 doing in the GTO, damn near 400rwhp with the bolt ons seems attainable. Tack a 150 shot on and on paper, the GTO should get the nod. Bottom line, anything can happen 
08-14-2006, 06:13 PM
#44
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
08-14-2006, 06:24 PM
#45
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
08-14-2006, 07:15 PM
#46
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern VA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
08-14-2006, 08:04 PM
#47
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
08-15-2006, 01:14 AM
#48
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FEARSM,
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
08-15-2006, 12:52 PM
#50
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
I know a few years ago I personally raced a friends bone stock anthracite 93 TT Supra, auto. 13.9 @ 109mph it ran. Bone stock. The 60 foot was in the mid 2.x range. My Talon was running mid 13's then at 95-97mph. He flew by me right at the finish line.
His car BPU managed an 11.1 @ 118ish mph with a built tranny.
Basically, what I'm saying is that there was something wrong with that TT that raced the Mach1.
08-15-2006, 01:13 PM
#51
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supratool
FEARSM,
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
LOL..I have owned several Supras. I know that. I was trying to see if HE knew what he was talking about or making the mods up. He seemed to know alot about the car. Just seeing if it was legit.
08-15-2006, 01:40 PM
#52
12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Basically, what I'm saying is that there was something wrong with that TT that raced the Mach1.
08-16-2006, 02:41 AM
#55
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dailydriver
There ALWAYS is whenever a MKIV loses, right?? We ALL know that they are TOTALLY INVINCIBLE, from pure stock right up to 2500 rwhp with a single the size of a beach ball.
Are you brain dead? Did you not gather from my post that I did beat a stock TT with my mid 13 sec Talon? WTF said they were invincible? I am just making an assessment from facts presented. Would you swallow a story where a FWD SRT4 murdered a stalled nitroused auto LS1 from a dig? You would be skeptical, and so am I, about his "story."
Roll all you want.
That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.
Originally Posted by tx3
whats the difference between a 600hp supra and an 800hp supra?
theyre both 12 seconds cars
theyre both 12 seconds cars
JFWY dude. 
08-16-2006, 02:53 AM
#56
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Iranndia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
I beat a Mach 1 5-speed with exhaust in my bolt-ons Z28 running on 7 cylinders. Mach 1s are turds. I'd be willing to believe your story if the supra was bone stock, otherwise it reeks of blue, oval shaped ****. 
08-17-2006, 07:07 PM
#60
12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Are you brain dead? Did you not gather from my post that I did beat a stock TT with my mid 13 sec Talon? WTF said they were invincible? I am just making an assessment from facts presented. Would you swallow a story where a FWD SRT4 murdered a stalled nitroused auto LS1 from a dig? You would be skeptical, and so am I, about his "story."
Roll all you want. That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.
Roll all you want.
That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.Maybe you are right for questioning if something was not right with the GTE. But that is also part of the problem here, all of those +++++++++++++s after the BPU on these cars. Has anyone ever made an "official" listing of what each one means (that is totally agreed upon by all)?? Why not just go ahead and list every one of their mods instead (like all other cars do, except for the few "stage" listed turbo cars)? Would it take 3 pages or what?
