Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

killed a shelby today

Old Apr 2, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #21  
Randy_W's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury, MD
Default

The Mustang isn't a muscle car, never was. the term musclecar was coined in the 1960's to describe a mid size car with a a full sized car's engine. Mustangs, Camaros, et, al, have always been pony cars, not musclecars, they may be muscle cars, but they're not musclecars.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #22  
beerformeplz's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SS4Luck

the vette is american muscle... just not a pony car

Then I guess the Ford GT should count also, thats right chevy had the Impala SS.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #23  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Randy_W
The Mustang isn't a muscle car, never was. the term musclecar was coined in the 1960's to describe a mid size car with a a full sized car's engine. Mustangs, Camaros, et, al, have always been pony cars, not musclecars, they may be muscle cars, but they're not musclecars.
THANK YOU!! Everytime that comes up around people that drive F-bodies/Mustangs/Corvettes, they almost argue that they have a muscle car. So then I drop the question, "Is a Miata with a 302 swap a muscle car?" They either drop it, or move on to, "No, it's still Japanese." So then I just go
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #24  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

I work for a Ford dealer and I had a guy tell me he would take me in the Vette in his GT500. I in my nicest voice told him he would get snapped off! He said oh what do you have done, told him I have the same hp in a much lighter car N/A, and a 100 shot for adding insult to injury. He was so adamant that he would win so I just left it at that!

The GT500's have run 12.2@117 at the hands of MM&FF but real world,real driver times are usually in the 12.7-13.0 times. A function of a heavy car on narrow tires.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #25  
beerformeplz's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by germeezy1
I work for a Ford dealer and I had a guy tell me he would take me in the Vette in his GT500. I in my nicest voice told him he would get snapped off! He said oh what do you have done, told him I have the same hp in a much lighter car N/A, and a 100 shot for adding insult to injury. He was so adamant that he would win so I just left it at that!

The GT500's have run 12.2@117 at the hands of MM&FF but real world,real driver times are usually in the 12.7-13.0 times. A function of a heavy car on narrow tires.
Not the GT500
The Ford GT


Last edited by beerformeplz; Apr 2, 2007 at 08:52 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #26  
That_guy's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: Desoto Tx
Default

I Heard The Ford Gt Has The Same Engine As The Ford Lightning Is This True
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #27  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

Originally Posted by That_guy
I Heard The Ford Gt Has The Same Engine As The Ford Lightning Is This True
Nope the Lightning has the 5.4 2 valve SOHC with a S/C

The Ford GT and the Shelby GT500 have the 5.4 DOHC with a S/C

The difference between the GT and GT500 is the block and supercharger.

The heads are the same, but no manley rods like the Terminators.

And BeerformePlz I was talking about the GT500 not the GT
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #28  
Stopsign32v's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

I'd like to see a Shelby GT and a BOSS go at it.

Last edited by Stopsign32v; Apr 2, 2007 at 11:01 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 11:03 PM
  #29  
Stopsign32v's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by germeezy1
but real world,real driver times are usually in the 12.7-13.0 times. A function of a heavy car on narrow tires.
Maybe someone that has never been on the drag strip or its their first run in the car ever at the track. With a single night with a hand full of runs any decent (not good) driver could get a stock GT500 better than 12.7 easily.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #30  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

Well seeing that the guy that got too 12.2@117 is a pro driver with 1,000's of drag strip passes I doubt a reasonably competent driver could get within 2 or 3 tenths of that without a whole lot of seat time.

Plus I deal in real world scenarios who cares what a car will run with all the moon and stars aligned? My question is always if I come up against X car from a dig or a roll can I expect to win. And for me the answer is a GT500 would get launched from a dig and snapped off from a roll.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:05 AM
  #31  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

BTW to give you some background I work for the enemy (FORD) and have driven a few GT500's.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #32  
geetee's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

nice kill! bet that guy thought he was gonna smoke you!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #33  
Stopsign32v's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by germeezy1
BTW to give you some background I work for the enemy (FORD) and have driven a few GT500's.
So? Does that make you an expert? I'm saying what I have seen. I've seen no GT500 at the track do worst than 13.0. Infact I've never even seen one in the 13's.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #34  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

Let me quote myself again


Well seeing that the guy that got too 12.2@117 is a pro driver with 1,000's of drag strip passes I doubt a reasonably competent driver could get within 2 or 3 tenths of that without a whole lot of seat time.

Plus I deal in real world scenarios who cares what a car will run with all the moon and stars aligned? My question is always if I come up against X car from a dig or a roll can I expect to win. And for me the answer is a GT500 would get launched from a dig and snapped off from a roll.

Did you ever see that?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #35  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

And MT may not drag race but there more competent than alot of drivers out there. They got 12.7's
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #36  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

In my old car ('94 Integra GS-R), I got a better time stock than any magazine (or anyone else that I can find) ever got. Every car is different, every track is different, all conditions are different... owners can, and often do, get better times out of their cars than magazines.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #37  
BoOsTeDeAgLe's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati OH
Default

"we pull over and talk and he claims that it was cutting out in first gear and that he should have had me because he has beaten lots of ta's".
Man, this really pisses me off, because 85% of people do this **** now, it used to only be ricers, what happened?

Anyway, good job on humbling him a lil bit.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #38  
germeezy1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default

No ****

My point was the GT500 is hard to launch, and with the best driver pretty much ever its capable of 12.2@ 117.

Its like alot of the EVO and STi guys that get excited by the 0-60 times not realizing how they get them. Not many people do redline clutch drops everyday!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 06:06 PM
  #39  
davered00ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, CT
Default

Most of those track times are with Evan Smith driving the **** out of them. Your average driver is not going to cut it.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #40  
LSXNV's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
From: Bettendorf Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by beerformeplz
And I guess Chevy couldnt figure it out either because they didnt even try to make an american muscle car.
arn't the older, stock, LS1's out running the "new" mustangs still? and the LT1's are right there with the mustangs. maybe they are just letting Ford catch up for a few years.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.