Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Killed by Civic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #41  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 39
From: Canada
Default

When you have cars that were made for racing and running 13sec 1/4 mile times stock such as the Evo, Skyline, Supra, NSX, etc. you cant lump them in the same category as a civic or similar cars.
I agree with you Nlevo, but the problem is that people(not always ricer)put civics,integras,rsxs,crxs in the same category as supras,evos,skylines and NSXs...thats what bothering me the most.They think their everyday fartcan is a GT racer.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #42  
Torque_Wrench's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
From: In the Sticks of Virginia
Default

Guys there's no reason to trash imports or imports to trash our cars. If you own a car...any kind of car....if you can mod it and make it run with "race cars"....then hell yeah...kudos to you!

I like my Z28 and I like some Cobras...I also like some EVO's and some Supra's

I respect anyone that can mod their car and make it run faster!

No need for hostility....no need for trashing others cars.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #43  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 39
From: Canada
Default

Guys there's no reason to trash imports or imports to trash our cars. If you own a car...any kind of car....if you can mod it and make it run with "race cars"....then hell yeah...kudos to you!
I do respect everyone who mod their cars the right way and push em to the limits. It's just the ricer phenomenom that gets me angry sometimes, like today
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #44  
Vanilla_Gorilla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: On BananaHead's Decklid
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
I do respect everyone who mod their cars the right way and push em to the limits. It's just the ricer phenomenom that gets me angry sometimes, like today
I respect well built civics and rsx's etc.. when they are built right. I'm with you on that one I can't stand the ricer mentality. I think it's possible for domestic car owners to have the "ricer mentality as well."
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #45  
Torque_Wrench's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
From: In the Sticks of Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
I do respect everyone who mod their cars the right way and push em to the limits. It's just the ricer phenomenom that gets me angry sometimes, like today
I agree with you......I respect anyone that mods their car..and I respect any car. But I don't repsect the little **** talkers. Win or loose....just be respectful/
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #46  
robbinthehood's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

I have more respect for this forum every day. Even though I have a 240sx with an sr20 in it I love seeing whats going on in the muscle car world as well. My car is by no means a ricer, lowered on good wide low offset rims with a stock body.... and a dent. Also runs 12s. But if I could have it my way itd have a bolt on ls1 in it.

I love this forum, good respect no matter what car it is as long as it doesnt look like ***.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #47  
skifast87's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott City MD
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
The average Civic is not a "POS." It is a better car overall than anything Ford or GM has made in the same class in the past few decades. If people decide to ALSO make them faster, that's their choice. Now I'm not talking about the gutted '87 CRX you see with the fart can. I'm talking about a nice 99-00 Si or something, tastefully done with a nicely-sized turbo. It goes from a "good" car, to something that is good and relatively fast. Still not everyone's cup of tea (including mine), but you can't really call the nice ones POSs. Not everyone wants or needs a Camaro/Firebird/Mustang type car.

I don't disagree with you. In fact i fully agree with you. I am talking about this kids with the 12 colors of stickers and the people who have a soda can for an exhaust. No paint just primer. I fully agree
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #48  
dailydriver's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, Pa.
Default

Originally Posted by Vanilla_Gorilla
Wow what an ignorant comment that was. You really need to do some homework. There has been a rich tradition with racing in the Japanese market. These companies have made strides in motorsports and have changed the way people race today.

Datsun/Nissan have a history dating back to the 1960s in road racing, rallying, and JGTC. Since it's introduction in 1957 the Nissan Skyline has been racing GT since 1964 road racing, and JGTC since its introduction in 1994. The Nissan Silvia debuted in 1968 and has been a part of road racing and World Rally Championship since the 1980s (before AWD took over).

Mitsubishi dates back to 1917 and has a history in street racing since the 1960s. Mitsubishi turned its focus to circuit racing and rally style events in the 1970s from WRC to Dakar. The Lancer 1600 GSR, Lancer EX2000 Turbo, Starion, and Galant VR-4 have dominated in rallying since the 1970s. The 1980s brought change with the Lancer Evolution.

Honda was founded in 1948 and almost immediately founded the Honda Racing Corporation (HRC) in 1954. Starting with motorcycles HRC contributed to the advancement of motorcycle sports. They have been a part of Motorcycle Grand Prix since 1959.

Honda also have ties to F1 where they first debuted in 1964. Honda also has been involved in circuit racing, CART, and the Indy Racing League. In 2006 Honda became the sole engine supplier for the IRL, including the Indianapolis 500. In the 2006 Indianapolis 500, for the first time in Indianapolis 500 history, the race was run without a single engine problem!

Toyota's history in motorsport can be traced back to the 1970s with rallying with the Corolla and later the Celica. They have been involved with CART from 1996-2002, F1 since 1997, and the IRL since 2003. 2007 marked Toyota's arrival in Nascar with the Camry and the Tundra in the Craftsman Truck Series.
I hope you are not referring to the WRC when you say that Mitsu have "dominated in rallying since the 1970s". If so, that is totally FALSE!! All Japan, or Asian Rally Championships, OK, but NOT the WRC. They did not "dominate" in the WRC until MUCH later, relatively recently, actually.
The same goes for Toy, with the Group A Celica GT4s, and "kit car" Corollas. DEFINITELY NOT in the 70s, in the WRC. Funny how with all of their "invincible technical superiority" and Camry/Corolla trillions of $$$$ behind them, your Nippon Giant does not have much to show for being in F1 for what, 10 years now, do they??!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #49  
NIevo's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default

Funny story just happened speaking of fart-can exhausts. Was heading out on the interstate going to get some steaks for dinner and I am cruising at 75mph next to this Civic with the classic F-C muffler. Well its coming up to a off-ramp and theres a semi in front of the civic so once the road for the off-ramp comes up he punches it around the semi. I swear it must have taken him 5 seconds to go from 75 to 80 but boy did that car sound like it was giving it all it had!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #50  
CaseyEaterMach1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Trenton NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Vanilla_Gorilla
They weren't into 1/4 machines but all around handling cars. They have great cars but they are over shadowed by the rods, customs, and muscle machines of the era.
Its not like Americans didn't try to make all around performers either, Corvettes had IRS starting in 1963 the Boss 302’s and the original Z28’s actually don't handle bad at all and with today’s tires handle nearly as well as a modern performance car. Also we can never forget our own light weight the Shelby Cobra probably the greatest all around performer of all time (well half ours the body is British) Plus people like to say how old school american muscle can't rev that high really the Boss 302 with its short 3 inch stoke and canted vales (that flow even better than LS6 heads) could out rev just about any DOHC on the market today same goes for Chevy's 302.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #51  
six_string_wiz's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

Originally Posted by CaseyEaterMach1
Its not like Americans didn't try to make all around performers either, Corvettes had IRS starting in 1963 the Boss 302’s and the original Z28’s actually don't handle bad at all and with today’s tires handle nearly as well as a modern performance car. Also we can never forget our own light weight the Shelby Cobra probably the greatest all around performer of all time (well half ours the body is British) Plus people like to say how old school american muscle can't rev that high really the Boss 302 with its short 3 inch stoke and canted vales (that flow even better than LS6 heads) could out rev just about any DOHC on the market today same goes for Chevy's 302.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #52  
Vanilla_Gorilla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: On BananaHead's Decklid
Default

Originally Posted by CaseyEaterMach1
Its not like Americans didn't try to make all around performers either, Corvettes had IRS starting in 1963 the Boss 302’s and the original Z28’s actually don't handle bad at all and with today’s tires handle nearly as well as a modern performance car. Also we can never forget our own light weight the Shelby Cobra probably the greatest all around performer of all time (well half ours the body is British) Plus people like to say how old school american muscle can't rev that high really the Boss 302 with its short 3 inch stoke and canted vales (that flow even better than LS6 heads) could out rev just about any DOHC on the market today same goes for Chevy's 302.
Oh I totally agree with you. Those cars were great handeling cars for the time. I was just responding to Johnnystock and his off base comment about imports not having any history. People forget that in 1968 Carol Shelby went to drive for Toyota and Pete Brock (formerly of GM) went to drive for Nissan/Datsun.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #53  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 39
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Vanilla_Gorilla
Oh I totally agree with you. Those cars were great handeling cars for the time. I was just responding to Johnnystock and his off base comment about imports not having any history. People forget that in 1968 Carol Shelby went to drive for Toyota and Pete Brock (formerly of GM) went to drive for Nissan/Datsun.
You still didnt named all of their great cars in the 60s. Thats what I said. Stop deforming for your pleasure, you did it twice already,enough I think. It seems that you are in love with the import cars, you always have that comment to trash domestics and to glorify imports. I dont get it why you do that here on LS1tech.com, a dedicated forum to domestics!!! I wont buy a 73 Lancer or a 66 Skyline with 160hp while a 67 Camaro has a 295hp 350ci; not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:39 AM
  #54  
h8s2w8's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: E.Peoria, IL / Jacksonville, NC
Default

dont feel bad about the civic death... i got walked on by an srt-4 (Im assuming heavily modded). The guy pulled on me 1 car easily under 55 or 60.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #55  
Vanilla_Gorilla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: On BananaHead's Decklid
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
You still didnt named all of their great cars in the 60s. Thats what I said. Stop deforming for your pleasure, you did it twice already,enough I think. It seems that you are in love with the import cars, you always have that comment to trash domestics and to glorify imports. I dont get it why you do that here on LS1tech.com, a dedicated forum to domestics!!! I wont buy a 73 Lancer or a 66 Skyline with 160hp while a 67 Camaro has a 295hp 350ci; not today, not tomorrow, not ever.

Name me one thread where I trash domestics in my history on LS1tech.com?


Here I did the search for you.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/search.php?searchid=5125419
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #56  
dailydriver's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, Pa.
Default

Originally Posted by CaseyEaterMach1
Its not like Americans didn't try to make all around performers either, Corvettes had IRS starting in 1963 the Boss 302’s and the original Z28’s actually don't handle bad at all and with today’s tires handle nearly as well as a modern performance car. Also we can never forget our own light weight the Shelby Cobra probably the greatest all around performer of all time (well half ours the body is British) Plus people like to say how old school american muscle can't rev that high really the Boss 302 with its short 3 inch stoke and canted vales (that flow even better than LS6 heads) could out rev just about any DOHC on the market today same goes for Chevy's 302.
x 3.

In fact, they ALL may have actually outhandled V_G's beloved, precious little TOY 2000GT that 'ol Shel piloted a few times way back then.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #57  
Vanilla_Gorilla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: On BananaHead's Decklid
Default

Originally Posted by dailydriver
x 3.

In fact, they ALL may have actually outhandled V_G's beloved, precious little TOY 2000GT that 'ol Shel piloted a few times way back then.
I think Toyota, when backed by Shelby, did good in terms of being the new team on the block. Not great but well for what they were able to develop in that short amount of time.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #58  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 39
From: Canada
Default

Name me one thread where I trash domestics in my history on LS1tech.com?
You are trying to make a proof that japanese cars had a greater history in the 60s than the american did, but you will never proof that, because everyone knows the 60s belongs to the americans. The trash I'm talking about is that you always have that little comment to take down americans;
People forget that in 1968 Carol Shelby went to drive for Toyota and Pete Brock (formerly of GM) went to drive for Nissan/Datsun.
That is an ignorant comment and you should do your homeworks:
Carroll Shelby has participated to a lot of projects and he was a specialist to modify any kind of car because of his racing background.He raced for a lot of car's company during the 50s; Cad-Allard, Aston Martin, Maserati, Austin-Healy, and Aston Martin. He retired driving in 1959 .He never raced for a japanese company.His great works is his Shelby AMERICAN vehicule company. He produced a total of 14915 pure american cars. He worked to modify a lot of cars for Dodge too, 19 models in total.

Brock, at the age of 19, was hired on the spot and went to work in GM's design studios. He worked on design for the corvair, corvette stingray,Cobra Daytona Coupe and the Ghia De Tomaso when he had a trip to Italy.

Peter Brock found the BRE when he left Carroll Shelby racing team in 1966.Pete thought he had a deal with Toyota to race their 2000GT in 1966/67, however that contract and the cars were given to Caroll Shelby instead. BRE then contracted with Hino Motors to develope their Contessa for California Club Racing. When Hino was merged into Toyota, Pete then turned to Nissan Motors Ltd. in Japan and gained a contract to assist in the high performance development of their 2000 Roadster. After that Nissan Motor Company U.S.A. picked up sponsorship for the BRE Datsuns.
1968: Pete Brock receives his first contract with Nissan Motors to undertake a high performance development of the Datsun 2000 roadster. A bit after, the 240z came and replace the roadster in the racing team.

He never drove for them.He was in the racing management and car's design.The latest achievent of Pete is a modern version of Daytona Cobra Coupe

SO, dont make people think for a second that Carroll Shelby belongs to Japanese racing history. About Brock, he did change direction a lot of time in his career and he was in a little war with Carroll, thats why he turned to Nissan.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #59  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
You are trying to make a proof that japanese cars had a greater history in the 60s than the american did, but you will never proof that, because everyone knows the 60s belongs to the americans. The trash I'm talking about is that you always have that little comment to take down americans;

That is an ignorant comment and you should do your homeworks:
Carroll Shelby has participated to a lot of projects and he was a specialist to modify any kind of car because of his racing background.He raced for a lot of car's company during the 50s; Cad-Allard, Aston Martin, Maserati, Austin-Healy, and Aston Martin. He retired driving in 1959 .He never raced for a japanese company.His great works is his Shelby AMERICAN vehicule company. He produced a total of 14915 pure american cars. He worked to modify a lot of cars for Dodge too, 19 models in total.

Brock, at the age of 19, was hired on the spot and went to work in GM's design studios. He worked on design for the corvair, corvette stingray,Cobra Daytona Coupe and the Ghia De Tomaso when he had a trip to Italy.

Peter Brock found the BRE when he left Carroll Shelby racing team in 1966.Pete thought he had a deal with Toyota to race their 2000GT in 1966/67, however that contract and the cars were given to Caroll Shelby instead. BRE then contracted with Hino Motors to develope their Contessa for California Club Racing. When Hino was merged into Toyota, Pete then turned to Nissan Motors Ltd. in Japan and gained a contract to assist in the high performance development of their 2000 Roadster. After that Nissan Motor Company U.S.A. picked up sponsorship for the BRE Datsuns.
1968: Pete Brock receives his first contract with Nissan Motors to undertake a high performance development of the Datsun 2000 roadster. A bit after, the 240z came and replace the roadster in the racing team.

He never drove for them.He was in the racing management and car's design.The latest achievent of Pete is a modern version of Daytona Cobra Coupe

SO, dont make people think for a second that Carroll Shelby belongs to Japanese racing history. About Brock, he did change direction a lot of time in his career and he was in a little war with Carroll, thats why he turned to Nissan.
He's not trying to say Japan has more of a racing history than America... just that you can't downplay their racing history, because it was definitely there, and it was definitely big.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #60  
Vanilla_Gorilla's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: On BananaHead's Decklid
Default

Originally Posted by Johnnystock
You are trying to make a proof that japanese cars had a greater history in the 60s than the american did, but you will never proof that, because everyone knows the 60s belongs to the americans. The trash I'm talking about is that you always have that little comment to take down americans. SO, dont make people think for a second that Carroll Shelby belongs to Japanese racing history. About Brock, he did change direction a lot of time in his career and he was in a little war with Carroll, thats why he turned to Nissan.
All I was trying to do was to show that imports do have a history after you made that off base comment. I provided some info off the top of my head and made a non confrontational post that they in fact did have a place motorsport history. Your attitude about imports is that they came out of no where after FnF was released which is what a lot of people seem to think around here. I acknowledge in the 1960s and 1970s muscle cars ruled about 20 posts ago. I never once said anything bad about domestic car or put one down! Hell, if you read any of my previous posts I actually "take down," as you would like to call it, import cars. I also own 4 domestics and all of them are muscle cars which I love!

I acknowledge my error in saying Caroll Shelby and Pete Brock drove for their respected import companies. Again, I was just explaining how great drivers in racing backed a team for both Toyota and Datsun, though it was short lived with Shelby. These teams did well for the time and resources they were put together with and that wasn't much.

Last edited by Vanilla_Gorilla; Apr 27, 2007 at 03:48 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.