Raced a New Stang GT "OVER RATED"
06-05-2007, 12:37 PM
#304
my friend has a new gt and i beat him every time. they are great out of the hole but up around 80 and up you can really put a hurt on them. that is stock of course. i would like to see how they do with some mods
06-05-2007, 12:42 PM
#305
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
And as for the 383 LT1 ATi'd vs. KB cobra...it would be a great race.....A TT Terminator...or....mach...well, good luck to the LT1 without the bottle. Seems mid 700 RWHP is mid boost level on a mach or terminator with a TT 63Mm HP kit.
LOL....my car made 700rwhp..on low boost on 93 pump gas..i doubt a KB Cobra is goin to stand much of a chance, but keep dreaming
and yes, i wish Unit or whatver his name was closer so he could realize how slow his pos is compared to a good old LT1
06-05-2007, 12:57 PM
#306
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
OMG...that guy knows nothing?..DUDE...STFU. Here....I'll edjumacate you.
5.0 94-95 215
4.6 96-98 225
4.6 99-04 265
4.6 4L 99-04 (N/A) 320........
...know your shiat before you spout off. YET another ill knowledged post from you about mustangs.
And as for the 383 LT1 ATi'd vs. KB cobra...it would be a great race.....A TT Terminator...or....mach...well, good luck to the LT1 without the bottle. Seems mid 700 RWHP is mid boost level on a mach or terminator with a TT 63Mm HP kit.
5.0 94-95 215
4.6 96-98 225
4.6 99-04 265
4.6 4L 99-04 (N/A) 320........
...know your shiat before you spout off. YET another ill knowledged post from you about mustangs.
And as for the 383 LT1 ATi'd vs. KB cobra...it would be a great race.....A TT Terminator...or....mach...well, good luck to the LT1 without the bottle. Seems mid 700 RWHP is mid boost level on a mach or terminator with a TT 63Mm HP kit.
You are a dumb ****!!! You would argue with a tree!! Lets say the 4v 4.6 does have 320 flywheel hp. WHO CARES ABOUT FLYWHEEL HORSEPOWER!
That means you have +/- 265 RWHP. Thats about what a stock LT1 6sp car puts out. WHO HOOO FOR THE 4.6 4V!!!!!!!!! A bone stock LS1 6sp car puts down 315 to the tire. If you try to argue otherwise your a bigger dipshit than everybody already thinks you are!! Do a search....Magazine racing is for ricers and bitches. Stop quoting road and track and visit a local dyno!
As for my sig which you took seriously.... Its a mockery of polesmokers like yourself!
06-05-2007, 01:17 PM
#307
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 305 h.o.
Hey stupid! Did you read his post before you shot your mouth off? He said that the 5.0 was a more powerfull engine than the 4.6. Read **** first. And evidentley it does make 265 at the flywheel cause you have it in this post
99-04.
99-04.
06-05-2007, 01:20 PM
#308
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LT1UltraZ
LOL....my car made 700rwhp..on low boost on 93 pump gas..i doubt a KB Cobra is goin to stand much of a chance, but keep dreaming
and yes, i wish Unit or whatver his name was closer so he could realize how slow his pos is compared to a good old LT1
and yes, i wish Unit or whatver his name was closer so he could realize how slow his pos is compared to a good old LT1
...AND to think KingCobra02 is calling me the internet racer....
06-05-2007, 01:33 PM
#309
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
EDIT.......nevermind, I am not going to get caught up in this lame ***, "I know someone faster than you" crap. It's lame.....
...AND to think KingCobra02 is calling me the internet racer....
...AND to think KingCobra02 is calling me the internet racer....
Do us all a favor and dont get caught up in anything on this site anymore.
Your a toolbag! Should I list every car that I have ever owned in my sig like you do?? Would that make me the end all for mustang knowledge?
06-05-2007, 01:33 PM
#310
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingCobra02
You are a dumb ****!!! You would argue with a tree!! Lets say the 4v 4.6 does have 320 flywheel hp. WHO CARES ABOUT FLYWHEEL HORSEPOWER!
That means you have +/- 265 RWHP. Thats about what a stock LT1 6sp car puts out. WHO HOOO FOR THE 4.6 4V!!!!!!!!! A bone stock LS1 6sp car puts down 315 to the tire. If you try to argue otherwise your a bigger dipshit than everybody already thinks you are!! Do a search....Magazine racing is for ricers and bitches. Stop quoting road and track and visit a local dyno!
As for my sig which you took seriously.... Its a mockery of polesmokers like yourself!
That means you have +/- 265 RWHP. Thats about what a stock LT1 6sp car puts out. WHO HOOO FOR THE 4.6 4V!!!!!!!!! A bone stock LS1 6sp car puts down 315 to the tire. If you try to argue otherwise your a bigger dipshit than everybody already thinks you are!! Do a search....Magazine racing is for ricers and bitches. Stop quoting road and track and visit a local dyno!
As for my sig which you took seriously.... Its a mockery of polesmokers like yourself!
Don't quote me and bash about RWHP, when I was responding to someone else talking about FWHP.....maybe if you followed the thread, instead of just coming in here and talking crap, you would actually understand what is being talked about. NOW......dumbass...please tell me how 320 FWHP = 265 RWHP.......you say I need to go to a dyno?...please...that just shows how much you know about me......ANOTHER THING.....315 RWHP on an LS1 is just a tad exhaggeration of the truth. FUNNY, how every thread you have been in you only talk about HP....not TQ, GEars...nothign....strictly HP. Funny, a Mach with ~20-30 less RWHP is a drivers race with an LS Fbod......keep talking your crap boy.
NOW EXPLAIN THIS........HOW HAVE I EVER POSTED INTERNET RACER CRAP OVER FACT? NO, I haven't...and all you are doing is spouting of crap in disagreement to have an arguement. EVERYONE HERE, can check all the posts in teh threads and see the BS you are pulling.
The sad part is, you are the one that is blind to Ford.......and even worse yet, you are prooving how much of a tool you are by jumping from thread to thread arguing with me...all the while having two posts. AND YOU CALL ME THE IDIOT IN EVERYONE'S EYES.......OK BUDDY.
You are doing nothing but throwing crap out to have an arguement. YOU SIR, win the internet BS Tool award.....go stand tall next to CHOCO TACO. WE Solute you Mr. Internet BS'er Man.
06-05-2007, 01:37 PM
#311
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingCobra02
Do us all a favor and dont get caught up in anything on this site anymore.
Your a toolbag! Should I list every car that I have ever owned in my sig like you do?? Would that make me the end all for mustang knowledge?
Your a toolbag! Should I list every car that I have ever owned in my sig like you do?? Would that make me the end all for mustang knowledge?
And yes, I do post past cars in my sig that way, people can see I dont' spout BS about cars I haven't owned/worked on.....unlike you. I dont' talk crap or spout off about cars I don't have first hand knowledge of, such as yourself. It is obvious to those that know the cars you are talking about, that you know NOTHING about the cars you are referring too. Now good day....I said....GOOD DAY!
06-05-2007, 01:42 PM
#312
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
Dude....that post right there (ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHERS) just prooves just how ignorant you are about stangs.
Don't quote me and bash about RWHP, when I was responding to someone else talking about FWHP.....maybe if you followed the thread, instead of just coming in here and talking crap, you would actually understand what is being talked about. NOW......dumbass...please tell me how 320 FWHP = 265 RWHP.......you say I need to go to a dyno?...please...that just shows how much you know about me......ANOTHER THING.....315 RWHP on an LS1 is just a tad exhaggeration of the truth. FUNNY, how every thread you have been in you only talk about HP....not TQ, GEars...nothign....strictly HP. Funny, a Mach with ~20-30 less RWHP is a drivers race with an LS Fbod......keep talking your crap boy.
NOW EXPLAIN THIS........HOW HAVE I EVER POSTED INTERNET RACER CRAP OVER FACT? NO, I haven't...and all you are doing is spouting of crap in disagreement to have an arguement. EVERYONE HERE, can check all the posts in teh threads and see the BS you are pulling.
The sad part is, you are the one that is blind to Ford.......and even worse yet, you are prooving how much of a tool you are by jumping from thread to thread arguing with me...all the while having two posts. AND YOU CALL ME THE IDIOT IN EVERYONE'S EYES.......OK BUDDY.
You are doing nothing but throwing crap out to have an arguement. YOU SIR, win the internet BS Tool award.....go stand tall next to CHOCO TACO. WE Solute you Mr. Internet BS'er Man.
Don't quote me and bash about RWHP, when I was responding to someone else talking about FWHP.....maybe if you followed the thread, instead of just coming in here and talking crap, you would actually understand what is being talked about. NOW......dumbass...please tell me how 320 FWHP = 265 RWHP.......you say I need to go to a dyno?...please...that just shows how much you know about me......ANOTHER THING.....315 RWHP on an LS1 is just a tad exhaggeration of the truth. FUNNY, how every thread you have been in you only talk about HP....not TQ, GEars...nothign....strictly HP. Funny, a Mach with ~20-30 less RWHP is a drivers race with an LS Fbod......keep talking your crap boy.
NOW EXPLAIN THIS........HOW HAVE I EVER POSTED INTERNET RACER CRAP OVER FACT? NO, I haven't...and all you are doing is spouting of crap in disagreement to have an arguement. EVERYONE HERE, can check all the posts in teh threads and see the BS you are pulling.
The sad part is, you are the one that is blind to Ford.......and even worse yet, you are prooving how much of a tool you are by jumping from thread to thread arguing with me...all the while having two posts. AND YOU CALL ME THE IDIOT IN EVERYONE'S EYES.......OK BUDDY.
You are doing nothing but throwing crap out to have an arguement. YOU SIR, win the internet BS Tool award.....go stand tall next to CHOCO TACO. WE Solute you Mr. Internet BS'er Man.
1. Have you ever heard of drive train loss??? Its about 10 -12% for a manual trans and 15-20% for an auto. But you being the dyno master you knew that im sure!
2. DO A SEARCH DUMB ***!!! YOUR ON A LS1 SITE!!!! A stock ls1 6sp puts 310-315 to the ground!!!!!
06-05-2007, 01:48 PM
#313
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingCobra02
1. Have you ever heard of drive train loss??? Its about 10 -12% for a manual trans and 15-20% for an auto. But you being the dyno master you knew that im sure!
2. DO A SEARCH DUMB ***!!! YOUR ON A LS1 SITE!!!! A stock ls1 6sp puts 310-315 to the ground!!!!!
2. DO A SEARCH DUMB ***!!! YOUR ON A LS1 SITE!!!! A stock ls1 6sp puts 310-315 to the ground!!!!!
320*.88 = 281.6
320*.85 = 272
320*.8 = 256
IF you are going to talk smack....know your **** first REAL close on that 265 RWHP guess........now STFU.
search?...ok mr. 2 posts/joined last month.
Y aren't you banned yet?
06-05-2007, 01:53 PM
#314
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
Man...another argument post....you couldn't tell the sarcasm in my post about your sig?.....you're are an f'ing moron.
And yes, I do post past cars in my sig that way, people can see I dont' spout BS about cars I haven't owned/worked on.....unlike you. I dont' talk crap or spout off about cars I don't have first hand knowledge of, such as yourself. It is obvious to those that know the cars you are talking about, that you know NOTHING about the cars you are referring too. Now good day....I said....GOOD DAY!
And yes, I do post past cars in my sig that way, people can see I dont' spout BS about cars I haven't owned/worked on.....unlike you. I dont' talk crap or spout off about cars I don't have first hand knowledge of, such as yourself. It is obvious to those that know the cars you are talking about, that you know NOTHING about the cars you are referring too. Now good day....I said....GOOD DAY!
Hey *** stain....you know absolutly nothing about me.... do I need to list(or show pics) of all my cars to make me knowledgable? I forgot more about an LS series gm motor than you will EVER know, and probably know more about fords than your stupid ***. I leave my sig blank (or list goofy *** cars) because to me its funny to laugh at dick heads like you that think their ASE master techs when they think I actually drive an escort! You are now our biggest running joke at the dealership!!! YOU MAKE OUR DAY!!
06-05-2007, 01:56 PM
#315
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
320*.9 = 288
320*.88 = 281.6
320*.85 = 272
320*.8 = 256
IF you are going to talk smack....know your **** first REAL close on that 265 RWHP guess........now STFU.
search?...ok mr. 2 posts/joined last month.
Y aren't you banned yet?
320*.88 = 281.6
320*.85 = 272
320*.8 = 256
IF you are going to talk smack....know your **** first REAL close on that 265 RWHP guess........now STFU.
search?...ok mr. 2 posts/joined last month.
Y aren't you banned yet?
THATS AWSOME!!!!! Its still lower than a ls1 6sp car's 315 REAR WHEEL HP, whats your point??
Last edited by KingCobra02; 06-05-2007 at 02:13 PM.
06-05-2007, 03:46 PM
#316
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cornwall, NY
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 305 h.o.
Hey stupid! Did you read his post before you shot your mouth off? He said that the 5.0 was a more powerfull engine than the 4.6. Read **** first. And evidentley it does make 265 at the flywheel cause you have it in this post
99-04.
99-04.
where the hell are you getting this **** from. I NEVER said that the 5.0 was a more powerful engine than the 4.6. Your reading comprehension is pathetic at best. I said that a 5.0 H.O. fox body is faster than a 96-98GT, not more powerful. Power isn't the end all be all of racing. Fox bodies weigh several hundred pounds less than an SN95... if you even know what that means. The dude I was talking to said he raced a 97 GT. ... NOT a 99-04 GT with the PI heads. Understand Junior? This thread needs a lock... Too bad I don't have that power, I can only ban people
06-05-2007, 04:10 PM
#318
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingCobra02
You are now our biggest running joke at the dealership!!!
OMFG...that is hilarious.....oh no.....a building full of salesman are laughing at me......even worse, tech's that can't even be called mechanics cause they need a book and a computer to tell them what is broken.......OMFG........Thank you, I needed a laugh after the BS you have posted........ millaTK......Sorry for getting involved with this guy.....I just hate BS being thrown for NO reason by know it all's. (banning of him would be nice though
).
06-05-2007, 04:34 PM
#319
TECH Resident
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 98Camarod
They made many more than 3 5.7 tpi 5 speeds. I've seen quite a few on ebay. I think it is LB89 option if I remember right.
Of course I'm talking factory, not aftermarket.
As for dyno racing...as this thread seems to have become lately...
98-00 LS1s typically dyno a bit lower than 01/02 LS1s. No matter which it is, what the actual rear wheel number ends up being depends on a lot of things, including the dyno itself, the correction factor used (STD will read ~3% higher than SAE, and no correction at all could be much higher or much lower), how well the weather instruments (mainly temp & barometer) are calibrated, and the state of tune of the car. Of course, it also depends upon the type of dyno (dynojet, load-bearing, etc).
From what I have seen, on a dynojet, and using only manual tranny cars, 98-00 LS1s typically put down ~290-300 RWHP. 01/02 cars perhaps 10 more. I've seen some down as low as 280 RWHP, and as high as 320 RWHP (maybe even one or two more, don't remember exactly).
99/01 Cobras typically make 270-275 RWHP. Mach 1s about the same. 96-98 Cobras 260-265. 99-04 GTs ~225. Stock 96-98 GTs barely register (sorry, couldn't resist).
06-05-2007, 04:37 PM
#320
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Bologna. Please link one that is on e-bay, or anywhere else. At all. I'd really like to see it.
Of course I'm talking factory, not aftermarket.
As for dyno racing...as this thread seems to have become lately...
98-00 LS1s typically dyno a bit lower than 01/02 LS1s. No matter which it is, what the actual rear wheel number ends up being depends on a lot of things, including the dyno itself, the correction factor used (STD will read ~3% higher than SAE, and no correction at all could be much higher or much lower), how well the weather instruments (mainly temp & barometer) are calibrated, and the state of tune of the car. Of course, it also depends upon the type of dyno (dynojet, load-bearing, etc).
From what I have seen, on a dynojet, and using only manual tranny cars, 98-00 LS1s typically put down ~290-300 RWHP. 01/02 cars perhaps 10 more. I've seen some down as low as 280 RWHP, and as high as 320 RWHP (maybe even one or two more, don't remember exactly).
99/01 Cobras typically make 270-275 RWHP. Mach 1s about the same. 96-98 Cobras 260-265. 99-04 GTs ~225. Stock 96-98 GTs barely register (sorry, couldn't resist).
Of course I'm talking factory, not aftermarket.
As for dyno racing...as this thread seems to have become lately...
98-00 LS1s typically dyno a bit lower than 01/02 LS1s. No matter which it is, what the actual rear wheel number ends up being depends on a lot of things, including the dyno itself, the correction factor used (STD will read ~3% higher than SAE, and no correction at all could be much higher or much lower), how well the weather instruments (mainly temp & barometer) are calibrated, and the state of tune of the car. Of course, it also depends upon the type of dyno (dynojet, load-bearing, etc).
From what I have seen, on a dynojet, and using only manual tranny cars, 98-00 LS1s typically put down ~290-300 RWHP. 01/02 cars perhaps 10 more. I've seen some down as low as 280 RWHP, and as high as 320 RWHP (maybe even one or two more, don't remember exactly).
99/01 Cobras typically make 270-275 RWHP. Mach 1s about the same. 96-98 Cobras 260-265. 99-04 GTs ~225. Stock 96-98 GTs barely register (sorry, couldn't resist).
at that last part.