Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

A roush 427R new body mustang rolled up on me today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2007 | 07:29 PM
  #21  
GTOpowered240sx's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Macon, Ga
Default

Good kill! Would've loved to see thier faces. You know, since 427R's are unbeatable.......
Old 05-24-2007 | 10:10 PM
  #22  
mystic98ls1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club

iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Default

Yea props on the looks but needs a little help in the performance dept! This one was yellow with black strips, it might only have one now I think I sucked one off when I left,lol
Old 05-24-2007 | 10:11 PM
  #23  
00firebird's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

roush is retarded, these arent even close to 427 cube motors why call it a 427 besides to make yourself look idiotic. its a stock cube motor with some dumb crap done to it, another waste of money roush product. nice rapage.
Old 05-24-2007 | 10:23 PM
  #24  
brian06eleanor's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: north georgia
Default

Originally Posted by 00firebird
roush is retarded, these arent even close to 427 cube motors why call it a 427 besides to make yourself look idiotic. its a stock cube motor with some dumb crap done to it, another waste of money roush product. nice rapage.
they call it 427 in representation of the flywheel hp that there supposed to make!
Old 05-24-2007 | 11:18 PM
  #25  
MrDavid's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
The 427 does not designate the engine displacement, it designates what Roush says the engine puts out bhp. That means he beat a +/- 360whp car.
Are you serious? It's over-rated by around 60hp? The GT500 is only over-rated by what......like 50?
Old 05-24-2007 | 11:22 PM
  #26  
brian06eleanor's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: north georgia
Default

what are you talkin about over rating? they prob really make 427 bhp, the 60hp loss is through the drive train to the rear wheels. either way there still slow for the $$$
Old 05-25-2007 | 08:58 AM
  #27  
allngn_c5's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by brian06eleanor
what are you talkin about over rating? they prob really make 427 bhp, the 60hp loss is through the drive train to the rear wheels. either way there still slow for the $$$

Slow or not, they look awesome, but with that being said I still wouldn't buy one.
Old 05-25-2007 | 10:15 AM
  #28  
TheLS1Kid's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

They are like 281ci's correct?
Old 05-25-2007 | 02:14 PM
  #29  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

yes, 281ci
Old 05-27-2007 | 01:24 AM
  #30  
mystic98ls1's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club

iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Default

one here got dynoed it put 376 to the wheels
Old 05-27-2007 | 05:07 AM
  #31  
Adam_346's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Good Kill
Old 05-28-2007 | 02:34 AM
  #32  
GMmexican's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
yes, 281ci
yeah i guess calling it a roush 281r would sound kinda weak
Old 05-28-2007 | 05:47 PM
  #33  
00firebird's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

still.. why not just go with 425 then or 420 or whatever... everyone and their grandmother knows a 427 is a typical big block or small block ***** out v8
Old 05-28-2007 | 05:59 PM
  #34  
BlackHoleSunSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

Saw one of these in Cedar Hill, damn they are gorgeous, new mustangs period are badass tho.
Old 05-28-2007 | 06:25 PM
  #35  
GR33N GoblinM6's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 1
From: Utah
Default

if its rated at 427bhp.. isnt that then 372rwhp if you use a 15% drivetrain loss?

what a coincidence.. my car just made 372rwhp today.. so i have a 427Z sweet

jk
Old 05-28-2007 | 06:39 PM
  #36  
'Trust''s Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 3
From: Eternity
Default

Originally Posted by 00firebird
still.. why not just go with 425 then or 420 or whatever... everyone and their grandmother knows a 427 is a typical big block or small block ***** out v8
It seems they did it for the intimidation factor, and I call BS on it making exactly 427 HP, 425 would have been a good rating. They just wanted to use 427 like you said, so people think its CI.
Old 05-28-2007 | 06:47 PM
  #37  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

It's not really any different than when people call the LS1 a "350." It's not really a "350," but it just sounds cooler.
Old 05-28-2007 | 07:16 PM
  #38  
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 5
From: Maine
Default

on a side note went to the track and saw a new saleen run 13.50's allnight. 50g's well spent
Old 05-28-2007 | 07:19 PM
  #39  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

We all know that a normal S281 isn't any faster than a regular GT. And they aren't quite $50k... last I checked it was $42k. Still overpriced, but not $50k. And you can't use 1/4 mile times to justify/disqualify price, because a C5 wasn't much faster in the 1/4 than an LS1 Formula, yet it cost ~$20k more. Of course the Corvette was much better overall, but still.

Last edited by Irunelevens; 05-29-2007 at 03:19 PM.
Old 05-29-2007 | 07:14 AM
  #40  
allngn_c5's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 1
From: Western Burbs of Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
And you can't use 1/4 mile times to justify/disqualify price, because a C5 wasn't much faster in the 1/4 than an LS1 Formula, yet it cost ~$20k more. Of course the Corvette was much better all, but still.
I suppose a Formula with 20 k thrown at it could be pretty touch to beat.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.