Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Ran my first 99-04 GT Mustang...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2007, 03:25 AM
  #101  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
My best time was a 13.2 with bolt ons, stock suspension, Nitto DR's and a (I think it was ) 2.2 60'.....this quote is from the quickest NA 4.6 on the site......he is still all motor and I think he runs high 11's now but he has a lot of work done
For one, a 2.2 60' time is not very good on street tires, and downright sad on drag radials. So not only would he have been in the 12s with a 1.8 or so 60' time, it also leads me to believe he's not the best driver. And second, the guy you quoted was somebody I linked to that thread. He told me that was his recipe for a "solid, consistent, all-day 12s 2V." And it doesn't matter how good of a DA the guy I know had for his run... he still ran it. And I like how you only quoted that one guy, and not the other people that agreed with me. There have been several in this thread, and atleast 2 (haven't checked it lately) on that thread over at svtp.
Old 07-24-2007, 08:09 AM
  #102  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
kyle91z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol, these are always my favorite threads.

Say a Mustang GT hits a 12.999, with full-bolt ons and slicks. Just say it is possible and it actually happens, who the **** cares? 12.999@ 105 mph isn't anything special with full bolt-ons...so even if you prove your point who the **** cares? It's LS1tech, not Slowass2vmustangtech
Old 07-24-2007, 08:22 AM
  #103  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well I'd say quite a few people care, based on this thread. And I also would figure that most car guys would like to have CORRECT information about cars they might potentially race, so I can't let them think that a bolt-on/geared/DR 99-04 GT is slower than it actually is. So yeah... I argue when I know I'm right.
Old 07-24-2007, 09:49 AM
  #104  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
kyle91z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well I'd say quite a few people care, based on this thread. And I also would figure that most car guys would like to have CORRECT information about cars they might potentially race, so I can't let them think that a bolt-on/geared/DR 99-04 GT is slower than it actually is. So yeah... I argue when I know I'm right.
I know how fast a bolt-on/geared/DR 99-04 GT is. NOT FAST AT ALL. They don't run 12's, end of story. Whoever ran 12's was either spraying and lying to you about it, or had cams they did not know about.
Old 07-24-2007, 10:27 AM
  #105  
On The Tree
 
Dynotune04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well I'd say quite a few people care, based on this thread. And I also would figure that most car guys would like to have CORRECT information about cars they might potentially race, so I can't let them think that a bolt-on/geared/DR 99-04 GT is slower than it actually is. So yeah... I argue when I know I'm right.
you should get some seat time in your car at the track. it would make it a lot easier to back up your arguments.
Old 07-24-2007, 11:16 AM
  #106  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
delsold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fenway
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dynotune04
you should get some seat time in your car at the track. it would make it a lot easier to back up your arguments.
ya he makes for a good point...what does your bolt on GT run?
Old 07-24-2007, 11:35 AM
  #107  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
haha good post, especially points 1,3, and 6, but it should say 2V stangs are slow....
Thank you for clarifying that.
Old 07-24-2007, 11:37 AM
  #108  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kyle91z28
I know how fast a bolt-on/geared/DR 99-04 GT is. NOT FAST AT ALL. They don't run 12's, end of story. Whoever ran 12's was either spraying and lying to you about it, or had cams they did not know about.
Well I'm glad you're the Mustang expert... I don't see why it's so hard to believe a 280-290rwhp car that weighs 3400lbs and has 4.10s can run 12s with drag radials.
Old 07-24-2007, 11:41 AM
  #109  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well I'm glad you're the Mustang expert... I don't see why it's so hard to believe a 280-290rwhp car that weighs 3400lbs and has 4.10s can run 12s with drag radials.
It's more than just peak hp though....I agree that a 2V bolt on (full bolt on) with DRs can hit high 12s. But, just remember, it's not just power..it's how and where the power is made (TQ/HP alike).

BTW - I don't consider an 'upper plenum' a bolt on. That's an aftermarket intake, which is basically at least a port job, and goes along with head work.
Old 07-24-2007, 11:44 AM
  #110  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dynotune04
you should get some seat time in your car at the track. it would make it a lot easier to back up your arguments.
Unfortunately I haven't been to the track since last summer, and that was only 1/8 mile. Being my first time at the track with this car (not to mention the 90 degree temps) I didn't expect anything fantastic, but I think my best run (out of 3 that night) was 9.0x @ 80mph... but the time was dropping every run. I need to get my car dynoed again to see if I am still at the same power levels with this new (remanufactured) shortblock that was installed a couple months ago. And then when it cools down again, I'm gonna go to Ennis and see what she'll do in the 1/4. But assuming I'm at the same power level as before, I'm hoping for/expecting mid 13s @ 103-105. But I suppose we shall just have to see what happens
Old 07-24-2007, 11:52 AM
  #111  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
It's more than just peak hp though....I agree that a 2V bolt on (full bolt on) with DRs can hit high 12s. But, just remember, it's not just power..it's how and where the power is made (TQ/HP alike).

BTW - I don't consider an 'upper plenum' a bolt on. That's an aftermarket intake, which is basically at least a port job, and goes along with head work.
Oh, I know it's not just about peak power... area under the curve is the most important part. And I'm glad that you agree with me about the 2V/12s thing. But an upper plenum really is just a 5 min job. I don't know what you mean when you say its "basically at least a port job?"
Old 07-24-2007, 12:25 PM
  #112  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
01FormulaTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,449
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

^^^if you are running 9's in the 1/8 dont expect low-mid thirteens....you will be dissapointed.....also just to clarify this whole thread I have basically been trying to point out that bolt-on GT's dont normally run 12's......if one does it was a fluke w/ amazing track conditions that dont usually occur......for every legit bolt-on only 2V in the 12's there is probably equal or more stock LS1's in the 12's(meaning it is a rare occurence).....this whole thread it seems to me like you are acting like bolt-on 2V's all run 12's and they just dont...prob 99% of 2V GT's that stay bolt-on only with full weight and DR's will never see 12's...now F-bodies on the other hand will DEFINITELY run 12's with just bolt-ons and the 2 cars just arent in the same league.....
Old 07-24-2007, 12:26 PM
  #113  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Oh, I know it's not just about peak power... area under the curve is the most important part. And I'm glad that you agree with me about the 2V/12s thing. But an upper plenum really is just a 5 min job. I don't know what you mean when you say its "basically at least a port job?"
Aftermarket upper plenums (upper intakes) have better 'holes' for flow. They are basically a port job. Some are same flow, but better design. I know it is a quick mod physically, but I (personally) consider it with Heads and Cams. Because....they all work together. But, that's just me. H/C work won't give you much benefit on stangs without a good upper intake (and vice versa).
Old 07-24-2007, 12:28 PM
  #114  
9 Second Club
 
04Terminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Holy ****. I think my next project will be a bolt-on 2V stang. I feel sure I can get a 12 sec slip. I love a challenge.

Didn't I see a post from TX hotrods showing a low 12 2V?

Stangs are slow. I wish I were as fast as V8EATR. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAwQjA4d8Qw

Last edited by 04Terminator; 07-24-2007 at 12:35 PM.
Old 07-24-2007, 12:29 PM
  #115  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
^^^if you are running 9's in the 1/8 dont expect low-mid thirteens....you will be dissapointed.....also just to clarify this whole thread I have basically been trying to point out that bolt-on GT's dont normally run 12's......if one does it was a fluke w/ amazing track conditions that dont usually occur......for every legit bolt-on only 2V in the 12's there is probably equal or more stock LS1's in the 12's(meaning it is a rare occurence).....this whole thread it seems to me like you are acting like bolt-on 2V's all run 12's and they just dont...prob 99% of 2V GT's that stay bolt-on only with full weight and DR's will never see 12's...now F-bodies on the other hand will DEFINITELY run 12's with just bolt-ons and the 2 cars just arent in the same league.....
I understand your point......I am just saying it can happen.

Maybe both of you came out so head strong on your opinions, you can't really see that you are saying the same thing, only differently.
Old 07-24-2007, 12:43 PM
  #116  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
01FormulaTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,449
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Holy ****. I think my next project will be a bolt-on 2V stang. I feel sure I can get a 12 sec slip. I love a challenge.

Didn't I see a post from TX hotrods showing a low 12 2V?

Stangs are slow. I wish I were as fast as V8EATR. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAwQjA4d8Qw
they sure did buddy......and here are the mods:
99 GT $6500
Cold Air intake $159
75mm Upper & TB $289
Upper/Lower control arms $209 (UPR)
Lakewood 90/10 or 70/30's $198/pr
Strange 10 way rear shocks $140/pr
4.10's $200
Off road H or X $159
Cat Back $300
Stage II Cams $625
Springs for Cams $229
SCT Tune with chip or XCal2 $379
Weld Rims/Tires $800 - used


Close to $4000 in mods and they got some 12.4's.....but IMO they should also add in some 33 spline axles, a new differential, and a new clutch, and also a new tranny b/c the T45 isnt gonna last that long.....
Old 07-24-2007, 12:48 PM
  #117  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Holy ****. I think my next project will be a bolt-on 2V stang. I feel sure I can get a 12 sec slip. I love a challenge.

Didn't I see a post from TX hotrods showing a low 12 2V?

Stangs are slow. I wish I were as fast as V8EATR. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAwQjA4d8Qw
Old 07-24-2007, 01:01 PM
  #118  
On The Tree
 
Dynotune04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
^^^if you are running 9's in the 1/8 dont expect low-mid thirteens....you will be dissapointed.....also just to clarify this whole thread I have basically been trying to point out that bolt-on GT's dont normally run 12's......if one does it was a fluke w/ amazing track conditions that dont usually occur......for every legit bolt-on only 2V in the 12's there is probably equal or more stock LS1's in the 12's(meaning it is a rare occurence).....this whole thread it seems to me like you are acting like bolt-on 2V's all run 12's and they just dont...prob 99% of 2V GT's that stay bolt-on only with full weight and DR's will never see 12's...now F-bodies on the other hand will DEFINITELY run 12's with just bolt-ons and the 2 cars just arent in the same league.....
agreed. my whole point was that it is possible for a 2 valve to see 12s with bolt ons gears and drag radials. not that it happens everyday. also you are right there is no comparison for an ls1 to a 2valve gt.
Old 07-24-2007, 02:12 PM
  #119  
On The Tree
 
Dynotune04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by delsold
ya he makes for a good point...what does your bolt on GT run?
other than what i already posted i have no new numbers for now. i can give you dyno numbers tho. 347 rwhp 427 ftlbs on a 100 shot with 800 psi bottle pressure. 259 289 on the motor.that was before the longtubes throttle body and plenum and the gears ( not that they matter). should be around 275-280 on the motor and 370-380 on the bottle with 950 psi (going back for retune before fun ford weekend aug 18th). my tuner said it should go low 12s maybe high elevens if i can get it to hook and drive the ***** outa of it. but im gonna go with 12.0-12.50 somewhere in that ballpark. and thats on the gas of coarse.
Old 07-24-2007, 02:24 PM
  #120  
TECH Resident
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lets add some more fuel to this fire....I know of a "stock-motored" 2V GT that went 11s. No power adder. No head porting. Stock cams, stock shortblock, just external engine mods.

Wanna internet race to see if I can prove it?


Quick Reply: Ran my first 99-04 GT Mustang...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.