Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors
View Poll Results: What's better for SFC's?
4130 all day err day.
2
33.33%
Mild steel gets the job done.
4
66.67%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

4130 vs. Mild Steel SFC's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2009 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
R1ch's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default 4130 vs. Mild Steel SFC's.

What's everyone's take on this? I know the 4130s are stronger and lighter than the mild steel, but by how much? Is it really a noticeable difference going to the 4130? I'm just debating if it's worth spending the extra $100.
Old 02-16-2009 | 10:46 PM
  #2  
95Yardbird's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: 92123
Default

I say good ol steel. Does what it's ment to and I would rether spend the extra money on something else.
Old 02-17-2009 | 08:20 AM
  #3  
UMI Performance's Avatar
FormerVendor

iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,473
Likes: 5
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Default

We sell quite a few of the chrome moly SFC's.. but we always recommend the mild steel. Mild steel is cheaper and the extra few pounds isn't worth it to me. But some feel it is and that is why we offer both.

If you aren't going for the lightest car in the world then the mild steel would be just fine!

Hope that helps,
Ryan
Old 02-17-2009 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
R1ch's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Thanks for your input guys.
Old 02-17-2009 | 06:08 PM
  #5  
Sam Strano's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
10 Year Member20 Year Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,598
Likes: 144
From: Brookville, PA
Default

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
We sell quite a few of the chrome moly SFC's.. but we always recommend the mild steel. Mild steel is cheaper and the extra few pounds isn't worth it to me. But some feel it is and that is why we offer both.

If you aren't going for the lightest car in the world then the mild steel would be just fine!

Hope that helps,
Ryan
I completely agree....
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
Old 02-18-2009 | 02:22 PM
  #6  
gyrene2003's Avatar
12 Second Club

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 1
From: Chesapeake va
Default

mild steel only for this pig of a vert!!!
Old 02-19-2009 | 06:41 AM
  #7  
SS101's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

moly is a stronger metal, but moly steel weighs the same as mild steel. the only reason that its lighters is because the moly tubing is thinner. fwiw, i preffer mild steel only because if you do have a failure, mild steel bends where moly usualy just snaps in my experience (a-arms mostly).
Old 02-21-2009 | 01:43 AM
  #8  
DevilDougWS6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by SS101
moly is a stronger metal, but moly steel weighs the same as mild steel. the only reason that its lighters is because the moly tubing is thinner. fwiw, i preffer mild steel only because if you do have a failure, mild steel bends where moly usualy just snaps in my experience (a-arms mostly).
correctish...but worded wrong. moly is a stronger material, and can be used in thinner layers but be as strong as mild steel, therefore being lighter.



Quick Reply: 4130 vs. Mild Steel SFC's.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.