Suspension theory BMW vs F-body
#82
#91
TECH Resident
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
True, but the average 4th gen car still has a similar front to rear weight bias even with a 150lb motor weight advantage. Swapping an LS1 into a thirdgen eliminates most of the front wheel weight bias, not to mention the power advantage over the TPI engines.
I'm torn about the 5th gen cars - too big, too heavy, aero doesn't look all that good, and probably can't stick a big enough tire underneath it. But when you compare it to the Challenger and Mustang, it will be competitive head to head. I think it is embarassing that Detroit's pony cars get bigger and heavier, yet the Nissan 370Z is lighter than it's predecessor - obviously faster in all ways too. Why can't GM just build a 3300lb f-body with cutting edge aero, 425hp LS3, bulletproof brakes, good riding suspension, and a killer interior for $40K - I would buy one in a heartbeat. Instead I want to buy older F-bodies and mod them myself.
I'm torn about the 5th gen cars - too big, too heavy, aero doesn't look all that good, and probably can't stick a big enough tire underneath it. But when you compare it to the Challenger and Mustang, it will be competitive head to head. I think it is embarassing that Detroit's pony cars get bigger and heavier, yet the Nissan 370Z is lighter than it's predecessor - obviously faster in all ways too. Why can't GM just build a 3300lb f-body with cutting edge aero, 425hp LS3, bulletproof brakes, good riding suspension, and a killer interior for $40K - I would buy one in a heartbeat. Instead I want to buy older F-bodies and mod them myself.