CETA with Strano/Koni combo
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CETA with Strano/Koni combo
Just wanted to post a few pics of the finished product; besides it seems like it's been a while since someone posted pics. I'm very happy with this setup; combined with a UMI rear suspension, the car rides much differently than it did stock. Handling is no comparison, this blows the stock setup out of the water; in terms of ride, I'd venture to say that it rides just as well, if not better than, stock. And that's even with a polyurethan transmission mount, and poly/rod LCAs and panhard bar. The only issue to resolve is a minor clunk I get at random times; I think I've traced the problem to the front mount for the rear LCAs. Those bastages need to be TIGHT; I had all sorts of noises until I tightened them as much as I could with box end wrenches.
Without further adieu, here are the pics. Not the greatest lighting conditions (a storm was rolling in as I started taking these), so I apologize. Keep in mind this is after putting about 300 miles on the setup, so the springs have had a little time to settle, but I'm unsure how long it takes for them to fully settle in.
Without further adieu, here are the pics. Not the greatest lighting conditions (a storm was rolling in as I started taking these), so I apologize. Keep in mind this is after putting about 300 miles on the setup, so the springs have had a little time to settle, but I'm unsure how long it takes for them to fully settle in.
#6
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And yea, I'm very happy with the stance as well. At first, I worried that Strano's springs wouldn't lower the car enough for my tastes, since they were "only" rated at 1.2". Needless to say, my worries were for naught.
Last edited by csxfbird; 07-20-2009 at 03:23 AM.
Trending Topics
#13
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately, I didn't think to take measurements before I installed the springs. I can take some when I can home, I'll post them tonight. The best I can do is a 'before' sideshot I have of the car from a year back or so, I'll get that up when I get home as well.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NorcaL
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Upper. Not that I would have done it anyway, but I read up on how using the lower perch on lowered car was a bad idea.
And yea, I'm very happy with the stance as well. At first, I worried that Strano's springs wouldn't lower the car enough for my tastes, since they were "only" rated at 1.2". Needless to say, my worries were for naught.
And yea, I'm very happy with the stance as well. At first, I worried that Strano's springs wouldn't lower the car enough for my tastes, since they were "only" rated at 1.2". Needless to say, my worries were for naught.
I am going to do the upper perch when I do mines
You helped with that decision.
#16
TECH Resident
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
Come on, it's on the web--it must be true!
Someday folks will realize that not every cars sits at the same height when stock.... so it's funny that they think they'll all be identical when lowered.
That said, I'm unaware of the rash of slammed cars on Strano springs. Yes, some sit lower than others do, but it's rare.... And fwiw, it's a car thing. Had a customer sell his Eibach's to a guy who screamed he sold him junk. Funny thing was on the original car they really were about 1.2" lower than stock. On the 2nd owner's car (who took the springs and shocks directly from the 1st guy and did a swap) the car was significantly lower. Of course Guy 2 never actually measured to see what it was, but I'd have to say it was on the order of more than 1.5". Now this is a set of Eibach's--the point being that some cars sit higher, some sit lower--even stock and regardless (not completely regardless) of what springs. Certainly a crappy set of springs that yields and can't support the weight will sit lower period. Not a problem with mine, but there is some inherent variability car to car.
Someday folks will realize that not every cars sits at the same height when stock.... so it's funny that they think they'll all be identical when lowered.
That said, I'm unaware of the rash of slammed cars on Strano springs. Yes, some sit lower than others do, but it's rare.... And fwiw, it's a car thing. Had a customer sell his Eibach's to a guy who screamed he sold him junk. Funny thing was on the original car they really were about 1.2" lower than stock. On the 2nd owner's car (who took the springs and shocks directly from the 1st guy and did a swap) the car was significantly lower. Of course Guy 2 never actually measured to see what it was, but I'd have to say it was on the order of more than 1.5". Now this is a set of Eibach's--the point being that some cars sit higher, some sit lower--even stock and regardless (not completely regardless) of what springs. Certainly a crappy set of springs that yields and can't support the weight will sit lower period. Not a problem with mine, but there is some inherent variability car to car.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#19
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry for starting the controversy. I didnt mean anything against Sam. I also realize that not every car is the same and that some will end up lowering more than others. I just see every once in a while that people get more than the 1.2 its supposed to be. I wanted to see what his was because frankly it looks very good. Now back to everyone praising the CETA
#20
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
No controversy... but you guys have to realize this is the 'net, not everything you "see" is true, and it's rare you get the entire story. I was trying to give you the entire story--is that controversial? I wouldn't have thought so..... More to the point, it amazes me how 50 thumbs up can be called into question by one odd-ball. The fact is it's unusual for happy folks to post as often as my customers do (and thank you all for that). I'd extremely disheartening for myself, and I'm sure others to work one's *** off only to have one partially explained thing cause a mess.
Just last week I was dealing with an issue (trying to) where a man has my springs, but also a lot of other stuff, including an adjustable TA. His pinion angle is clearly off because he has a vibration. Next thing I know I get a message wondering if the springs are the problem, that "someone" told him the car is too low. Meanwhile there were no measurements I could find, and a few others told him his car wasn't nearly as low as theirs and they don't have the issue. But there is a classic example of what someone could have read and thought was true.... The issue is adjustment of the pinion angle (and fwiw, he couldn't even duplicate the stock setting to at least get the vibration gone, as it was never measured before).
Again, no controversy here.. Just my asking that folks better consider what they are reading and the reasons that form the basis for *ANY* (my own included) opinion.
Just last week I was dealing with an issue (trying to) where a man has my springs, but also a lot of other stuff, including an adjustable TA. His pinion angle is clearly off because he has a vibration. Next thing I know I get a message wondering if the springs are the problem, that "someone" told him the car is too low. Meanwhile there were no measurements I could find, and a few others told him his car wasn't nearly as low as theirs and they don't have the issue. But there is a classic example of what someone could have read and thought was true.... The issue is adjustment of the pinion angle (and fwiw, he couldn't even duplicate the stock setting to at least get the vibration gone, as it was never measured before).
Again, no controversy here.. Just my asking that folks better consider what they are reading and the reasons that form the basis for *ANY* (my own included) opinion.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion