BMR K-member broke!!
#81
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Vernon House
We send Products out to be broken and twisted by stress machines. but that don't solve all the problems. for one there are header makers out there that make parts that don't quite fit and we as makers would not know of all the small problems that might be there. If you the buyer says hey my hooker long tubs hit on the pass side if I had 1/16 of an inch more clearance It will be fine .and I am not saying all header do this just some. we test parts as often as we can but we don't test all the headers out there .or turbo kits and so on this would take a lot of time. and lets say its not a part that you the buyer would even buy and put on your car and we test fit the part and make our product work with this ( lets say X brand Header) we spent money and time were it is not best spent therefor more cost the more you pay. and the last time I checked more money spent on a part is not the thing you want to do . I would like to make parts that fit every car and every motor combo and have no problems but that's not the way it seems to be. we try our best to make a trouble free part . bottom line is you buy the parts and we need to know what you the buyer prefer to use on your cars. . I am not trying to bust anyone's ***** here just letting you know we like to here form the buying public. thanks guys for the space
No, my problem would be with the suspension widget that wasn't properly tested and/or designed before it was released for public consumption. This is regardless of price. Maybe I'm in the minority, but I guaran-damn-tee you that I wouldn't be looking to save a few bucks (or a few hundred bucks) on an inferior design. Hell no! Those dollars saved "ain't" gonna reattach my arm after an accident or save the family out for a Sunday drive that I hit when I lost control after my front wheel went rolling off the car. No thanks.
#82
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Fulton 1
No, my problem would be with the suspension widget that wasn't properly tested and/or designed before it was released for public consumption. This is regardless of price.
Both Brett's post and Vernon's have led me to think that their companies are doing their best to design, test, and build good products. That, and good customer service, are about all anybody can ask of a company. My point is that we shouldn't let them, or any company, get away with delivering anything short of that standard.
Last edited by John95Z28; 07-16-2004 at 10:38 AM.
#83
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just to add a little bit of info. Every company that makes a product has a 800 complaint line for customer complaints. It is then part of the companies responsiblilty to investigate the problem and see if something needs to be changed for future designs.
This sounds like what has happened here with BMR and ProFab. Unfortunately they don't have the ability to spend 1000s of hours doing product testing and must rely on customer feedback to make the product better. With that said, its the responsibility of the manufacturer to warranty an item if it is truly either a design flaw or build flaw that causes a failuer, no questions asked.
I have lots of BMR stuff on my car now for well over 30k miles and I don't a single complaint.
This sounds like what has happened here with BMR and ProFab. Unfortunately they don't have the ability to spend 1000s of hours doing product testing and must rely on customer feedback to make the product better. With that said, its the responsibility of the manufacturer to warranty an item if it is truly either a design flaw or build flaw that causes a failuer, no questions asked.
I have lots of BMR stuff on my car now for well over 30k miles and I don't a single complaint.
#84
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Just to add a little bit of info. Every company that makes a product has a 800 complaint line for customer complaints. It is then part of the companies responsiblilty to investigate the problem and see if something needs to be changed for future designs.
This sounds like what has happened here with BMR and ProFab. Unfortunately they don't have the ability to spend 1000s of hours doing product testing and must rely on customer feedback to make the product better. With that said, its the responsibility of the manufacturer to warranty an item if it is truly either a design flaw or build flaw that causes a failuer, no questions asked.
I have lots of BMR stuff on my car now for well over 30k miles and I don't a single complaint.
This sounds like what has happened here with BMR and ProFab. Unfortunately they don't have the ability to spend 1000s of hours doing product testing and must rely on customer feedback to make the product better. With that said, its the responsibility of the manufacturer to warranty an item if it is truly either a design flaw or build flaw that causes a failuer, no questions asked.
I have lots of BMR stuff on my car now for well over 30k miles and I don't a single complaint.
With that said though, I'm going to suggest that it doesn't take "1000s of hours of product testing" to make a design viable. IMO, if you're gonna advertise it as acceptable for street duty then you should at least test it in SEVERE street duty. I mean don't drive it down the freeway a few times and declare it a winner if nothing fell off or just proclaim it worthy just because it looks "beefy". Instead, beat the **** out of the setup on a test car and see what happens. If it breaks then improve the design. This doesn't cost much beyond a loaner car, a little bit of time, and some bad roads. Sure, its not an elegant approach, but at least its a way to shake out the problems. Besides it adds documentation that you have indeed tested the product if (Heaven forbid) a lawyer should be knocking at the door some afternoon.
#85
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fulton ... I get it, Trackbird gets it and many others get it.
However, others prefer to pay to be a vendor's R&D department.
Like Brett stated,
I found myself in this role. I was a test bed for new and untested, untried product. It scared the hell out of me.
Now, an important point Brett did forget was that I paid for everything. BMR didn't replace anything for free. I bought those ends he described for $25 each. I mean, taking free parts and then warning others about what happened would be hypocritical, right.
For the record ... I still have a BMR STB on the car (I had to alter the pads to sit flush and not cover the oil filler cap) and BMR boxed SFCs (had to rework the rear mount to fit the LCA mount).
I said this in response to Brett's post ...
and I said this early on ...
And I still mean it ...
However, others prefer to pay to be a vendor's R&D department.
Like Brett stated,
Originally Posted by BMR Fabrication Inc.
It took me a little while to figure this out but one of my very first customers was MitchNTX. At the time, I worked out of my garage and only made control arms and shock tower braces and had just started making panhard rods. I worked a full time job and made parts in the evenings and weekends. I remember Mitch specifically because we had problems with his panhard rod eating rod ends. This was a new, virtually untested market at the time and I had only been running one of these panhard rods on my own car for a few months. I had sold two or three previous to his. Needless to say, the rod ends were not up to par and replacing them only delayed the inevitable. After this learning experience, the product received higher strength chrome moly rod ends and was only marketed as a "race" only item from that day forward. In an effort to fix the problem on Mitch's car and develop a product that was more streetable, I custom built poly-bushed ends for his panhard rod.
Now, an important point Brett did forget was that I paid for everything. BMR didn't replace anything for free. I bought those ends he described for $25 each. I mean, taking free parts and then warning others about what happened would be hypocritical, right.
For the record ... I still have a BMR STB on the car (I had to alter the pads to sit flush and not cover the oil filler cap) and BMR boxed SFCs (had to rework the rear mount to fit the LCA mount).
I said this in response to Brett's post ...
Originally Posted by mitchntx
I think you would agree, once you find something that works, you stick with it.
Originally Posted by mitchntx
For those who are happy with your particular brand of suspension components, whatever it may be, that's great. I'm glad for you and hope you have many miles and years of uneventful service from them. All we can do is share the results from our own experiences.
#86
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mitch, you're right. I always appreciate your insight as I appreciate that of the other real "racers" here, but I also understand that there are folks who will look beyond the numbers to see what they want to see. My Dad used to say, "there are liars, damn liars, and statisticians". I'm far from a statistician or a suspension/chassis expert (not even close) , but I do enjoy the topic and I do understand good engineering practice, so I'm appalled to see the average consumer being used as a test mule. I know it happens all the time - especially with powertrain stuff. I would just hope that the consumer is made aware of it. If you're willing to agree to testing the latest and greatest PHR, then that's wonderful. If it breaks you shouldn't complain, after all you agreed to be the tester. However, if you were unaware then you SHOULD complain and you shouldn't be paying for the parts.
I don't normally get all wound up about this kind of thing nor do I complain much - after all its just a website, right? However, in this case I see a trend. Its a trend that further passes the burden to the consumer and I hate that. If I were to start building parts out of my garage I would GD well perfect my welding skills and my design before I sold it for money. That's all
I don't normally get all wound up about this kind of thing nor do I complain much - after all its just a website, right? However, in this case I see a trend. Its a trend that further passes the burden to the consumer and I hate that. If I were to start building parts out of my garage I would GD well perfect my welding skills and my design before I sold it for money. That's all
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
#87
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To my knowledge we have had not one of our K members Break. There has been customers who bent them from big wheel stands ( not just one more like 12-15 wheel stands), hit the wall , and 1 hit the back of a tractor trailor. I can't say we have never had one bend but we took care of them. Those things are out of anyones control . I feel when a driver hits the wall or wrecks his car he has more problems than to worry about buying more suspension parts. Anyone who trusts me to make them a good part and supports us is a freind of mine. If your friend wrecked you would help right? This is one way I can help . There has been other builders tell me I will go broke doing this. I don't care. I would rather be broke. I had nothing when I started Pro Fab . If my values don't make it in the racing world, then I guess it was not ment to be. This is just how I feel take it or leave it. I aslo would like to address the Part failure that one person brought to our attention parts do fail there is no denying that. we buy and I am sure other companies do the same. we buy tubing from all around the world. It is A fact that tubing manufactures have made bad batches of steel . We sent back 4000 feet of tubing 3 months ago. The problem was the tubing would split after welding. We found this out at the test lab . not all parts make it to you the buyer. I just want you all to know builders try to make you safe parts I put our parts on my daily driver and my kids ride to work with me every day. I feel we make a safe part. If Not I would not use this on my own car and put my kids lives on the line. thanks for your time Vernon
#88
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I appreciate your efforts, diligence and attention to detail, Vernon. I hope you understand my (our) point of view as well.
In my specific situation, as long as everything was together and working as it should, I too was happy. It was only after it broke (again) and the collateral damage it caused after losing control as a result of the breakage, that I realized that I was a mule. I was the test bed. And I posted my experience.
In hind sight, I wish I had worded it little differently. I was rather shook up and pissed off at the time. I learned something from that, as well.
I don't believe for an instant that BMR willingly sold me a part that they thought was defective. That isn't the point of my ire nor do I think it's Fulton's.
Good luck with future development at Pro-Fab. Just keep in mind that sometimes, these parts are "tested" under extreme conditions and there are real people behind the wheel at the time.
I am getting tired of constantly having to justify my decisions, simply because I wanted to share my experience to keep others from making the same mistakes I did and to MAKE fabricators keep their standards high. It appears that shear numbers can over power honest feedback.
So, I'm done. You guys can buy your soft springs, over-priced shocks and cheap suspension parts. But be forwarned ... posting up your results can be ulcerating ...
In my specific situation, as long as everything was together and working as it should, I too was happy. It was only after it broke (again) and the collateral damage it caused after losing control as a result of the breakage, that I realized that I was a mule. I was the test bed. And I posted my experience.
In hind sight, I wish I had worded it little differently. I was rather shook up and pissed off at the time. I learned something from that, as well.
I don't believe for an instant that BMR willingly sold me a part that they thought was defective. That isn't the point of my ire nor do I think it's Fulton's.
Good luck with future development at Pro-Fab. Just keep in mind that sometimes, these parts are "tested" under extreme conditions and there are real people behind the wheel at the time.
I am getting tired of constantly having to justify my decisions, simply because I wanted to share my experience to keep others from making the same mistakes I did and to MAKE fabricators keep their standards high. It appears that shear numbers can over power honest feedback.
So, I'm done. You guys can buy your soft springs, over-priced shocks and cheap suspension parts. But be forwarned ... posting up your results can be ulcerating ...