Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Spohn vs Hotchkis Sway Bars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2006, 04:39 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Heartless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: modesto california
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Spohn vs Hotchkis Sway Bars

It seems reading thru the sway bar posts, many people run the 36.5 mm front Hotchkis sway bar (hollow) and a Spohn 22mm rear bar (solid)..... how does the Spohn 32 mm front bar (solid) stack up against the 36.5 mm Hotchkis sway bar ?

Old 04-09-2006, 09:57 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Bud M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The Hotchkis 36.5 mm bar is significantly stiffer than the Spohn 32 mm bar. 32/22 bars will make the car tailhappy.
Strano's 35/22 is a better combo than Spohn's 32/22.
Old 04-09-2006, 10:10 PM
  #3  
TECH Cry Baby BOSS APPROVED!
iTrader: (5)
 
Urban Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

36.5 Hotchkis/22 Spohn does the job extremely well. Would not have it any other way.
Old 04-09-2006, 10:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (18)
 
FSUNole17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

im curious also, is the hotchkis rear bar not good or is the spohn just better?
Old 04-09-2006, 10:56 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FSUNole17
im curious also, is the hotchkis rear bar not good or is the spohn just better?
Nothing wrong with it besides the fact that its too big for most peoples taste. That is unless you lower the PHB (not talking about the BMR kit) and thats a different animal.

Most people here when upgrading either run a 32mm bar or some sorts. If they run anything bigger than that its mostlikley a strano bar.
Old 04-10-2006, 12:39 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Heartless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: modesto california
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bud M
The Hotchkis 36.5 mm bar is significantly stiffer than the Spohn 32 mm bar. 32/22 bars will make the car tailhappy.
Strano's 35/22 is a better combo than Spohn's 32/22.
Really..... I'm not a physicist, but I would have thought a 32 mm solid chrome moly bar that is heat treated and tempered would be significantly stiffer.... I would imagine without a second thought that the hollow bar would bend or distort much easier than the solid bar would......

Old 04-10-2006, 01:07 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
Addicted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heartless
Really..... I'm not a physicist, but I would have thought a 32 mm solid chrome moly bar that is heat treated and tempered would be significantly stiffer.... I would imagine without a second thought that the hollow bar would bend or distort much easier than the solid bar would......

Bust out your Mechanics of Materials Book or Machine Design Book.. The Moment of inertia is:
I=(pi/64)*(D^4-d^4)
J=2*I
D=outer diameter
d=inter diameter

(angle of deflection)
theta=(T*l)/(G*J)
T=Torque
l=length
G=modulus of rigidity
J=polar second moment of area

if you play around you'll find that the outter diameter effects the stiffness (reduction in angular deflection) more the the inner diameter. This is why Al driveshafts are large diameter and hollow.. And G is nearly always almost the same even when heat treating occurs.
Old 04-10-2006, 07:58 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
YellowToy/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern WV just south of MD
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good data wins again
Old 04-10-2006, 05:00 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Captainofiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Addicted
Bust out your Mechanics of Materials Book or Machine Design Book.. The Moment of inertia is:
I=(pi/64)*(D^4-d^4)
J=2*I
D=outer diameter
d=inter diameter

(angle of deflection)
theta=(T*l)/(G*J)
T=Torque
l=length
G=modulus of rigidity
J=polar second moment of area

if you play around you'll find that the outter diameter effects the stiffness (reduction in angular deflection) more the the inner diameter. This is why Al driveshafts are large diameter and hollow.. And G is nearly always almost the same even when heat treating occurs.
Good Job I was about to say something like that. and remember whenever something is tempered it increases the metals ducility which means not stiffening it.
Old 04-10-2006, 05:43 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cumbias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How does the Hotchkis rear bar feel or compare to the spohn 22? Is it harder to control? Or too manuvaruble? (given the hotchkis front bar is used)
Old 04-10-2006, 06:12 PM
  #11  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

As hinted at above, too big of a rear bar will make the car tail-happy. 21 mm solid or 22 mm hollow is best for the rear of these cars. On the front, get a big one (35 mm Strano or 36 mm Hotchkiss.)
Old 04-10-2006, 11:44 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Bud M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Heartless
Really..... I'm not a physicist, but I would have thought a 32 mm solid chrome moly bar that is heat treated and tempered would be significantly stiffer.... I would imagine without a second thought that the hollow bar would bend or distort much easier than the solid bar would......

I originally thought the same way but I've had both bars and the 35 hollow is obviously stiffer than the solid 32.
Old 04-10-2006, 11:49 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cumbias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tail-happy?
Forgive the questions, I keep learning new stuff everyday!!!
Old 04-11-2006, 11:25 AM
  #14  
Staging Lane
 
Bowtie Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Carlsbad,CA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cumbias
Tail-happy?
Forgive the questions, I keep learning new stuff everyday!!!
Tail happy = Oversteer.
Old 04-11-2006, 11:25 AM
  #15  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

It's about the front vs. rear bar ratio..... 32/22 and 35-36/25 are both too damn stiff in the rear when compared to the front.

Aside from all the autocrossing, etc.... I sell a lot of brands. Hotchkis and Addco amont them (Addco makes 32/22 solid). And you can bet it would have been a lot easier for me to have just sold what was already out there. And I would have--had either worked the way I feel they should. They don't.

When I decided that a different set of bars was needed, I had Addco build them for me (not me in my shop bending metal). And I also decided I was going to keep them light so I didn't have to drag around weigh that was useless.....
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 04-11-2006, 11:28 AM
  #16  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

BTW....... I race my stuff (and win).

Also Chrome-Moly and all that is of NO use on a swaybar. It's not any stronger. CM is stronger in tension and compression, but no more resistant to twisting force. Also, CM is more brittle in ways than more normal steels. Not what I really want on a part that is intended to flex to work.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 04-11-2006, 04:54 PM
  #17  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cumbias
Tail-happy?
Forgive the questions, I keep learning new stuff everyday!!!
For maximum cornering speed, you want the lateral loads (sideways forces trying to push the car off the road) as equally split between the front and rear tires as possible. This is because each tire only has so much grip. Once you use up that grip, that end of the car slides. When you put too big of a bar on one end of the car, that end of the car is forced to bear more of the lateral load, so that end will slip first in a turn. Too big of a bar on the rear will make the rear end step out while still having grip on the front end = oversteer. Also, remember the rear tires are the ones that put power down on a corner exit, so a big bar back there will hinder that by putting less weight on the inside tire, allowing it to spin easier.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:40 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cumbias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, CA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cal
For maximum cornering speed, you want the lateral loads (sideways forces trying to push the car off the road) as equally split between the front and rear tires as possible. This is because each tire only has so much grip. Once you use up that grip, that end of the car slides. When you put too big of a bar on one end of the car, that end of the car is forced to bear more of the lateral load, so that end will slip first in a turn. Too big of a bar on the rear will make the rear end step out while still having grip on the front end = oversteer. Also, remember the rear tires are the ones that put power down on a corner exit, so a big bar back there will hinder that by putting less weight on the inside tire, allowing it to spin easier.
Oh, so if the rear bar is too big, the car will lose traction in a turn if youre going too fast possibly causing a tailspin?
Old 04-11-2006, 08:46 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Bud M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That would be an extreme situation. More common would be loss of traction on the inside wheel as you try to accelerate out of a turn.
Old 04-12-2006, 05:36 PM
  #20  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Whether you just spin the inside tire on a turn exit or do a "tail spin" just depends on how hard you push the car, and what the surface conditions are like. I've looped my car several times on an autoX course, and my friend did over two rotations driving my car once! AutoX is a good drill for learning the limits of your car, and just how it behaves at those limits.

I think it is important to point out that you can easily spin a car of this type and HP level even with the suspension set up properly. All you have to do is push it until the tail steps out a little, then simply floor the gas pedal! Been there, done that! Always remember to steer with the throttle in a max effort turn.

Last edited by Cal; 04-12-2006 at 05:42 PM.



Quick Reply: Spohn vs Hotchkis Sway Bars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.