








roll bar vs cage
my car will be a road racer that sees limited street duty (75 and sunny or nicer ONLY), with tons of power to play with. i like the idea of a cage not only because it keeps the roof off your head if you put the car on its top (definatly nice if you have a t-top car like i do), but also for the structural stability - i'll be running a moderate H/C combo on a 427 so containing the torque is a contributing factor - but if the added points really wont help all that much, i'll be happy to ditch the extra weight.
At some point in time, you might decide to compete in a series in that car. It would be a shame to have to ditch all the time and effort spent on either cage only to find out it does meet specs for a series.
Having said that, neither the Wolfe or Spohn cage/bars meet anything close to road racing specs.
I know Wolfe only uses ERW tubing and suspect Spohn does the same. Almost all classes of road racing I'm familiar with requires DOM tubing.
Also, a bolt in cage is just about next to worthless as it bolts in through the floor pan.
This practice doesn't give you a solid foundation to build off of, it intrudes into the passenger compartment quite a bit, causing things like heads, arm and legs better contact points.
And consequently, doesn't add a tremendous amount of chassis rigidity,
Here are some pics of a cage we built in a 3rd gen ...
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=9223
Notice the base plates welded to significant structural points (where multiple seams come together).
And amazingly enough, the inside cage demensions are almost identical between 3rd and 4th gens. I was very surprised ...
HTH
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
At some point in time, you might decide to compete in a series in that car. It would be a shame to have to ditch all the time and effort spent on either cage only to find out it does meet specs for a series.
Having said that, neither the Wolfe or Spohn cage/bars meet anything close to road racing specs.
I know Wolfe only uses ERW tubing and suspect Spohn does the same. Almost all classes of road racing I'm familiar with requires DOM tubing.
Also, a bolt in cage is just about next to worthless as it bolts in through the floor pan.
This practice doesn't give you a solid foundation to build off of, it intrudes into the passenger compartment quite a bit, causing things like heads, arm and legs better contact points.
And consequently, doesn't add a tremendous amount of chassis rigidity,
Here are some pics of a cage we built in a 3rd gen ...
http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/index.php?showtopic=9223
Notice the base plates welded to significant structural points (where multiple seams come together).
And amazingly enough, the inside cage demensions are almost identical between 3rd and 4th gens. I was very surprised ...
HTH
For NASA and CMC,
Section 15.6.18 of the NASA CCR:
2201 - 3000 lbs.
1.500” x 0.120” Chrome-moly / Seamless mild steel (DOM)
1.750” x 0.095” Chrome-moly / Seamless mild steel (DOM)
1.750” x 0.120” ERW* (No issuance of log books for cars with ERW cages 04/30/03)
*Note- Specifications listed for reference for inspection of grandfathered vehicles.
3001 - 4000 lbs.
1.750” x .120” Chrome-moly / Seamless mild steel (DOM)
No ERW allowed.


