2011 mustang gt
04-04-2010, 11:16 PM
#44
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-05-2010, 12:05 AM
#45
TECH Addict
^so i can beat a '10 camaro too. honestly who gives a ****? i don't like ether one of them. the new camaro is fugly and the mustang is a ford. its all personal prefernce, not which is faster, or has more power, or whos dick is bigger.
04-05-2010, 07:25 AM
#48
Have you looks at the heads on the 6.2 and the valve? 2.16 intake valve. Flow 320-330 cfm on the intake stock. Doesnt matter how many cams its has... Its not like the more cams the more power. Exhaust lift is exhaust lift,duration is duration. If anything you would think the motor would make less power with all thoses extra parts to spin.
I think its about time ford came out of the wood works and made a normal gt that was a quick car. Ford has been dragging *** for to long. I wish they would stop with all the small cube BS though. Bring back the 302?412hp? Seriously if they were gonna make a new motor why not a 400ci 32 valve engine producing 475-500hp.
04-05-2010, 10:25 AM
#52
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
REALLY?
Have you looks at the heads on the 6.2 and the valve? 2.16 intake valve. Flow 320-330 cfm on the intake stock. Doesnt matter how many cams its has... Its not like the more cams the more power. Exhaust lift is exhaust lift,duration is duration. If anything you would think the motor would make less power with all thoses extra parts to spin.
I think its about time ford came out of the wood works and made a normal gt that was a quick car. Ford has been dragging *** for to long. I wish they would stop with all the small cube BS though. Bring back the 302?412hp? Seriously if they were gonna make a new motor why not a 400ci 32 valve engine producing 475-500hp.
Have you looks at the heads on the 6.2 and the valve? 2.16 intake valve. Flow 320-330 cfm on the intake stock. Doesnt matter how many cams its has... Its not like the more cams the more power. Exhaust lift is exhaust lift,duration is duration. If anything you would think the motor would make less power with all thoses extra parts to spin.
I think its about time ford came out of the wood works and made a normal gt that was a quick car. Ford has been dragging *** for to long. I wish they would stop with all the small cube BS though. Bring back the 302?412hp? Seriously if they were gonna make a new motor why not a 400ci 32 valve engine producing 475-500hp.
04-05-2010, 11:26 AM
#53
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your on LS1tech Ross the Alvin Hoss, there will be no such mention of the GT500 which is a bad *** car with huge power potential with simple bolt ons and blower upgrades. Mike at G-force has set up a couple that are monster with not all that much done. But alas lost on the GM fan base, both camos are filled with idiots though.
The 4 Valve Mod motor Ford heads have been great since 1996, the current GT500 heads are bad *** pieces. To me this is Fords first mod motor meant for NA power, toe to toe with the GM stuff. They had the Mach 4 valves and 01 and prior Cobras. When my LT1 was pretty much dead stock with a cold air at most maybe, I always loved racing the 96-98 Cobras because it was always damn close. But the mod Ford always shined under pressure, not NA. Who knows, maybe with boost and meth this new 5.0 will be just as great. THis is the right time to be a fan of these cars, they maybe fatties, but they're briniging the heat son.
The 4 Valve Mod motor Ford heads have been great since 1996, the current GT500 heads are bad *** pieces. To me this is Fords first mod motor meant for NA power, toe to toe with the GM stuff. They had the Mach 4 valves and 01 and prior Cobras. When my LT1 was pretty much dead stock with a cold air at most maybe, I always loved racing the 96-98 Cobras because it was always damn close. But the mod Ford always shined under pressure, not NA. Who knows, maybe with boost and meth this new 5.0 will be just as great. THis is the right time to be a fan of these cars, they maybe fatties, but they're briniging the heat son.
04-05-2010, 11:39 AM
#54
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-05-2010, 12:11 PM
#55
REALLY?
Have you looks at the heads on the 6.2 and the valve? 2.16 intake valve. Flow 320-330 cfm on the intake stock. Doesnt matter how many cams its has... Its not like the more cams the more power. Exhaust lift is exhaust lift,duration is duration. If anything you would think the motor would make less power with all thoses extra parts to spin.
Have you looks at the heads on the 6.2 and the valve? 2.16 intake valve. Flow 320-330 cfm on the intake stock. Doesnt matter how many cams its has... Its not like the more cams the more power. Exhaust lift is exhaust lift,duration is duration. If anything you would think the motor would make less power with all thoses extra parts to spin.
thanks.
but like i said, i was ASKING...not stating.
i have nothing against the new mustangs. more power to them.
04-05-2010, 12:31 PM
#56
I've never been a fan of the mustang. Mainly because of how many are on the road. And the GTs are slow. But this new 2011 one looks like it'll be a good competitor to the current camaro. Lighter, comparable power...
but everyone on here is biased towards GM. so i'll hop on the band wagon. rustang lollol.
but everyone on here is biased towards GM. so i'll hop on the band wagon. rustang lollol.
04-05-2010, 01:10 PM
#57
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-05-2010, 02:01 PM
#58
The torque management on the camaro with the auto is not **** on the 6 speed, the trap speed of the automatic being 79? Pft, not with the 6 speed camaro. The stang automatic is like the old ford and chevy autos, they just go. But like the factory 4th and third gens in the past, the manual trans can go faster stock for stock if they have a driver that can launch. Lighter and put more power to the ground.
04-05-2010, 03:48 PM
#59
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
