ws6 or 03 cobra???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2011, 11:18 PM
  #161  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Snake_Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In front of a mustang
Posts: 1,124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I love cobras/Termis. Almost/kinda wish i would of bought one, but i couldnt find one anywhere near the price range the OP find one for and also my car is my DD and im pretty sure their cable clutches which is a damn leg workout practically compared to the buttery smooth LS7 clutch.
Snake_Skinner is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 11:24 PM
  #162  
Banned
 
Schmalgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snake_Skinner
and im pretty sure their cable clutches which is a damn leg workout practically compared to the buttery smooth LS7 clutch.
Indeed. Much stiffer than the TA.
Schmalgar is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 11:58 PM
  #163  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Which is why I find it hilarious when F-body/Corvette owners bitch about driving their 6spd cars every day because "it's a real leg workout"
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 01:00 AM
  #164  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Snake_Skinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In front of a mustang
Posts: 1,124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

^ True statement. Throw em in a Termi and theyll be wishing they had that hydraulic clutch back.
Snake_Skinner is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 01:58 AM
  #165  
On The Tree
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The LS7 clutch is a pile of junk if you race or add a bit more hp to a car.

Last edited by winters97gt; 07-01-2011 at 02:00 AM.
winters97gt is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 08:20 AM
  #166  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
viper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schmalgar
Indeed. Much stiffer than the TA.
I put a Centerforce in my 03. It's like night and day from stock. Much easier. The guy that sold the car to me actually sold it for that reason. He was about 50 and said it was killing him to drive it around. What he didn't know was the clutch was supposed to be stiffer, but not that stiff. The cable was badly frayed and broke a month after I got the car. I put the replacement on and it was a huge improvement.
viper1 is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 01:26 PM
  #167  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

And it is amazing what an adjustable cable/quadrant does for the clutch as well.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 02:22 PM
  #168  
Banned
 
Schmalgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by viper1
I put a Centerforce in my 03. It's like night and day from stock. Much easier.
Interesting, I might look into that!
Schmalgar is offline  
Old 07-01-2011, 01:06 AM
  #169  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
ragu1585's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i liked my stage 3+ with an adjustable quadrant
ragu1585 is offline  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:19 PM
  #170  
On The Tree
 
T-Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos, TX/Greenville TX
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ragu1585
lol ignorance/lack of knowledge hits us again. better luck next time with your arguements
Either you guys don't know what ignorant means, or you're all dumbasses. I don't like mod motors. Plain and simple. Maybe you do, and that's fine. The OP wanted to know our opinions and I gave it to him.

The fix for the sparkplug holes gets the job done, but it is risky. When you put it in, the aluminum shavings fall down in your cylinder and can bend valves. And guess what, you still only have 4 threads. Sure the material is better and it holds on, but it is not uncommon for the sleeve to come out with the plug when you change the sparkplugs.

Also, when you bore a mod motor, the cylinders distort as much as 4/1000 after you torque the headbolts because the head bolts are tied closely to the cylinder (note that this isn't a problem if you use a torque plate). They also use oil more commonly than the LS style engine (mostly in town driving) because of the low tension oil rings.

And yea, squad cars and taxis MAY go 3 or 400k. But you WILL encounter more problems than you would with an LS style engine all things being equal. Period. These guys are not machinists. Don't be fooled by the things that they say just because they gang up on someone who has a different opinion than theirs. Ask any decent, unbiased machinist and he will tell you that there are more fundamental problems with the mod motor than the LS1.

Now you can make an informed decision. You can make good power with a mod motor, the decision is yours. And even if you make a different decision than I did, I won't call you retarded or ignorant because I feel the need to reassure myself about my car. I drive an LS1.
T-Top is offline  
Old 07-02-2011, 06:08 PM
  #171  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
ragu1585's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T-Top
Either you guys don't know what ignorant means, or you're all dumbasses. I don't like mod motors. Plain and simple. Maybe you do, and that's fine. The OP wanted to know our opinions and I gave it to him.

The fix for the sparkplug holes gets the job done, but it is risky. When you put it in, the aluminum shavings fall down in your cylinder and can bend valves. And guess what, you still only have 4 threads. Sure the material is better and it holds on, but it is not uncommon for the sleeve to come out with the plug when you change the sparkplugs.

Also, when you bore a mod motor, the cylinders distort as much as 4/1000 after you torque the headbolts because the head bolts are tied closely to the cylinder (note that this isn't a problem if you use a torque plate). They also use oil more commonly than the LS style engine (mostly in town driving) because of the low tension oil rings.

And yea, squad cars and taxis MAY go 3 or 400k. But you WILL encounter more problems than you would with an LS style engine all things being equal. Period. These guys are not machinists. Don't be fooled by the things that they say just because they gang up on someone who has a different opinion than theirs. Ask any decent, unbiased machinist and he will tell you that there are more fundamental problems with the mod motor than the LS1.

Now you can make an informed decision. You can make good power with a mod motor, the decision is yours. And even if you make a different decision than I did, I won't call you retarded or ignorant because I feel the need to reassure myself about my car. I drive an LS1.
this coming from a guy who didnt buy a car because his daddy told him this and that.... and as far as oil burnin, ive had 2 ls style cars (both vettes) and 4 mustangs and not one of my mustangs did i ever have to add oil between oil changes, but i add oil in my lsx cars everytime between oil changes - go figure... im not hating on ls motors, i love my vettes, more then my mustangs (cobra was right there with the vettes) but im just blown away by your knowledge between the 2 style motors, thats all.
ragu1585 is offline  
Old 07-02-2011, 07:30 PM
  #172  
On The Tree
 
T-Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos, TX/Greenville TX
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What the hell does who taught me what I know have to do with it? That's a stupid irrelevant thing to say.

And I'm not talking about your vettes and mustangs. I'm talking about on average. What is ignorant, is if anyone wants to argue that a mod motor will use less oil on average than an LS motor. That is ignorant.
T-Top is offline  
Old 07-02-2011, 07:39 PM
  #173  
On The Tree
 
T-Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos, TX/Greenville TX
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also, my dad owns a VERY successful performance machine shop. He's not some spode that just mouths off like apparently some of you are. So if I'm going to take anyone's word, it'd be his.
T-Top is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 01:56 PM
  #174  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
whatsa347's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: clear lake, Texas
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by T-Top
What the hell does who taught me what I know have to do with it? That's a stupid irrelevant thing to say.

And I'm not talking about your vettes and mustangs. I'm talking about on average. What is ignorant, is if anyone wants to argue that a mod motor will use less oil on average than an LS motor. That is ignorant.
I know plenty of procharged little 2v's that don't have any oil issues, my old cobra used up oil but it was a 347 stroker. The fact is arguing which car is better is just plain stupid in the first place, not just oil consumption.
whatsa347 is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 03:30 PM
  #175  
LS7 Member
 
UTzo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ls motors love to eat oil. That's not a very good argument...
UTzo6 is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 07:25 PM
  #176  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, my mom's '01 Vette eats a few quarts between changes... most of that is coming from the leaking rear main seal, which neither of my Mustangs ever had a problem with. And she does NOT drive her car hard at all.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 07:53 PM
  #177  
On The Tree
 
T-Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Marcos, TX/Greenville TX
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Again, there are plenty of cases where an ls motor used oil and a mod motor didn't. We're talking about on average here. Big picture. There are way to many variables to look at a single owner's experience.
T-Top is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 07:55 PM
  #178  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Your dad's experiences aren't necessarily any more valid than our's... when looking at the big picture, he still has VERY limited experience with either engine compared to how many of them are out there. And there are WAY WAY WAY more mod motors out there than LSx engines.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 08:41 PM
  #179  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by T-Top
Again, there are plenty of cases where an ls motor used oil and a mod motor didn't. We're talking about on average here. Big picture. There are way to many variables to look at a single owner's experience.
Time to shutup.
-Ross- is offline  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:52 PM
  #180  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
charlie_gonzales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by UTEvo8
ls motors love to eat oil. That's not a very good argument...
My white camaro went through oil like it was gas, my black camaro didn't really go through much, and my blue cobra didn't go through any that I remember, both my trucks didn't(don't) go through oil...

And I like to drive my cars...
charlie_gonzales is offline  


Quick Reply: ws6 or 03 cobra???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.