Texas A&M to the SEC!!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...369663352.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...NewsCollection
My opinion on the better education if based on real world experience. Obviously my experience is confined to the construction trades and my opinion of atm might different if I were in another field such as veterinary but I'm not. I only can compare what I've seen and the geotech, mechanical and civils from atm have been marginal at best. It's quite possible that its just a reflection on that particular person but I doubt it when you consider the sample size of people I've dealt with in the last 8 years in this business. I'm sure there are plenty of people who feel the same about UT but until I have proof otherwise I'll continue to believe that an education at atm is inferior to UT in my discipline.
The ole saying, "you get what you pay for" seems to ring true here. There's a reason why ivy league schools are so expensive.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...NewsCollection
That article was posted over a year ago. If there was an issue with it then don't you think the Wall Street Journal would have pulled it? I know you don't have much common sense but damn, even this is mind-blowing.
The PAC wanted all four, but would have taken just just OU and OSU as late as Monday afternoon, when the two Arizona schools changed their minds. Making it 8-4 in favor without UT, which is below the 9 needed.
The issue with the LHN is it has to be a true 3rd tier network, and it currently isn't. As long as it has the loopholes in it that allow ESPN and Fox to monkey around with 1st and 2nd tier games a couple times a year to allow an upper tier game to slip to the 3rd tier so ESPN and LHN can try and force people to subscribe, other conference members will have issue with it.
A true 3rd tier network would not already be able to say which Men's BB conference games it would be televising. If they fix that and limit the HS sports/recruiting issues, then the rest of the conference will be ok with it.

That article was posted over a year ago. If there was an issue with it then don't you think the Wall Street Journal would have pulled it? I know you don't have much common sense but damn, even this is mind-blowing.

There is no way to refute that type of article, its strictly opinion. The criteria with which the rankings are obtained is purely subjective therefore there's not going to be one. It's cool.though, I'm not worried about finding a job after I've got that piece of paper. My years of real world experience will put me well above the green-horns from either establishment.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I think instead of adding teams to the current 9 schools, maybe give Baylor the boot and resurrect the BIG 8
When an aggie enrolls as a student they go through fish camp where they ingrain their hatred for "TU" by a series of events and activities. Their entire school song is dedicated to hating "TU".
You are missing how much this will effect A&M, especially academically.
When an aggie enrolls as a student they go through fish camp where they ingrain their hatred for "TU" by a series of events and activities. Their entire school song is dedicated to hating "TU".
You are missing how much this will effect A&M, especially academically.
I don't hate A&M, my wife went there and I've gone to plenty of games and yell practices while wearing maroon.
I also don't think A&M is a bad academic school, my wife went there and she is much smarter than me (and 99.9%) of the people on this board. But SEC's academic standards are much lower than A&M's, don't forget about "Vision 2020".






