Wheels & Tires Forged | Billet | Cast | Radials | Slicks

skinny front tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2008 | 06:39 AM
  #41  
RedRyder518's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Katy, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by TJ
daily drive on an et front? holy cow.
you guys have *****, or really good insurance, or lots of money.
I don't DD my ET Fronts...but I sure as hell feel a LOT safer driving on them than some tires rated for a bug...that is half the weight and half the speed.
Old 11-23-2008 | 08:12 AM
  #42  
2001z's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: Fountain Inn, SC
Default

most people on here are missing the point of why people run et front runners its not for the purpose of handling its for the track when your running a bisply tire. when you run a radial with a biasply in the rear you are gonna feel like your on skates but with the front runners up front it is much better and doesnt feel like you have a flat tirea at 100+ mph. To the people running the vw tire good luck and if your that broke and cant afford a little more for a tire then sell it and buy a damn honda and dont drag race.
Old 11-23-2008 | 11:21 AM
  #43  
black01_WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL.
Default

I was looking at the MT S/R's and they have 2 different sizes. Should I get the larger of the two is the car will see little street time?
Old 11-23-2008 | 12:15 PM
  #44  
OIF1VET's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 1
From: Muskegon, MI
Default

Originally Posted by black01_WS6
I was looking at the MT S/R's and they have 2 different sizes. Should I get the larger of the two is the car will see little street time?
Mine's street/strip.. I went with the 26's.. Do you have coil overs? Reason I ask is when I switch between my 18's and my 15's(skinnies) I have to raise the ride height by over an inch for the skinnies to clear..
Old 11-23-2008 | 02:00 PM
  #45  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by RedRyder518
I don't DD my ET Fronts...but I sure as hell feel a LOT safer driving on them than some tires rated for a bug...that is half the weight and half the speed.
i should have quoted camaro396. he posted that he daily drives them.
Old 11-23-2008 | 02:28 PM
  #46  
black01_WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL.
Default

Originally Posted by OIF1VET
Mine's street/strip.. I went with the 26's.. Do you have coil overs? Reason I ask is when I switch between my 18's and my 15's(skinnies) I have to raise the ride height by over an inch for the skinnies to clear..
I just have the QA1 shocks single adjustable.
Old 11-23-2008 | 05:01 PM
  #47  
SIC LSX's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 2
From: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus46Gt
I ran 165r15s up front and to be honest its really not much diff. I run no front sway bar also, but have piece of mind not having my tires blow out at 120mph. I've seen to many fail lately as I said earlier
165r15 VW tires are not the same as 165/8-r15's. I would not run the metric VW tires on my car
Old 11-23-2008 | 05:41 PM
  #48  
Ruckus46Gt's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by SIC LSX
165r15 VW tires are not the same as 165/8-r15's. I would not run the metric VW tires on my car
yea we know this they are a little smaller diameter then vw tires, but still have the same load rating and speed rating so really dont see the difference
Old 11-30-2008 | 08:53 PM
  #49  
98Camarod's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 2
From: Summerville, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus46Gt
yea we know this they are a little smaller diameter then vw tires, but still have the same load rating and speed rating so really dont see the difference
What is the speed/load rating on the mt you run?
Old 12-02-2008 | 07:47 AM
  #50  
chrysler kid's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 6
From: Mckinney Plano Frisco
Default

i have put 5k miles on arizonian tires.. so far they are wearing better than the old set i had before

i trust them for daily driving. however i wouldnt trust them over 120mph. i could see things going badly at the track with them but not on the street, and my car never sees more than 75 mph on the freeway
Old 12-02-2008 | 08:52 AM
  #51  
Camaro396's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,091
Likes: 7
From: Toledo, Oh
Default

Yeah I guess I wouldn't mind street driving them, but there is NO way I'd want anything to do with 130mph traps at the track on those..
Old 12-02-2008 | 11:23 AM
  #52  
fordeater's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by tillery
The sportsmans are a bias tire. Not a radial. If you mix the two hell yea your car is going to drive all messed up. even if you did bias on both ends it will, newer cars suspension isnt made for a bias ply. MT does make a radial and so does Hoosier. And the guy from Discount tire you should know this. Also what are the specs on the 165/80 tire? For the guys who do lighten thier car, running a tire like that may not be that bad. but for my heavy car I need a better tire.

Sportsmans are radials, it clearly says it on the tire and on every website they are for sale on. I have them on my car and would never run a cheapo 165 its just not worth it.
Old 12-02-2008 | 03:20 PM
  #53  
chrysler kid's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 6
From: Mckinney Plano Frisco
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro396
Yeah I guess I wouldn't mind street driving them, but there is NO way I'd want anything to do with 130mph traps at the track on those..
then again if your trapping 130mph your probably not daily driving the car. if you spent that much on speed i think you could spend an extra $35 a tire, or even the extra $250 for a street set of front runners lol
Old 12-02-2008 | 09:37 PM
  #54  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by fordeater
Sportsmans are radials, it clearly says it on the tire and on every website they are for sale on. I have them on my car and would never run a cheapo 165 its just not worth it.
sportsmans are NOT radial tires.
the sportsman SR tire IS a radial tire.
poster was prolly confused.

Last edited by TJ; 12-02-2008 at 10:38 PM.
Old 12-02-2008 | 09:38 PM
  #55  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by chrysler kid
i have put 5k miles on arizonian tires.. so far they are wearing better than the old set i had before

i trust them for daily driving. however i wouldnt trust them over 120mph. i could see things going badly at the track with them but not on the street, and my car never sees more than 75 mph on the freeway
75mph continuous driving will put more heat in the tire than a quick 120mph blast will.
IMO, what you are doing is more dangerous than using them at the track.
no chance of building up sustained heat in a 8-12 second blip down the 1320.
Old 12-02-2008 | 09:50 PM
  #56  
Ruckus46Gt's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by TJ
sportsmans are NOT bias ply
the sportsman SR tire IS a radial.
poster was prolly confused.
I beg to differ. I run sportsmans on my daily driver they are bias ply

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

Brand: Mickey Thompson
Product Line: Mickey Thompson Sportsman Front Tires
Part Type: Tires
Part Number: MTT-1573
Tire Size: 26.00 x 7.50-15
Rim Diameter (in): 15 in.
Sidewall Style: Blackwall
Tire Construction: Bias-ply
Directional: No
Tire Diameter (in): 26.00 in.
Section Width (in): 6.30 in.
Tread Width (in): 4.80 in.
Minimum Recommended Rim Width (in): 3.50 in.
Maximum Recommended Rim Width (in): 6.50 in.
Asymmetrical Tread Pattern: No
Tread Depth: 8/32 in.
DOT-Approved: Yes
Tube Required: No
Tread Ply Quantity: 4
Quantity: Sold individually.
Notes: Front tire. This is a 4-ply tire with an 8-ply rating.
Old 12-02-2008 | 10:38 PM
  #57  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus46Gt
I beg to differ. I run sportsmans on my daily driver they are bias ply

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

Brand: Mickey Thompson
Product Line: Mickey Thompson Sportsman Front Tires
Part Type: Tires
Part Number: MTT-1573
Tire Size: 26.00 x 7.50-15
Rim Diameter (in): 15 in.
Sidewall Style: Blackwall
Tire Construction: Bias-ply
Directional: No
Tire Diameter (in): 26.00 in.
Section Width (in): 6.30 in.
Tread Width (in): 4.80 in.
Minimum Recommended Rim Width (in): 3.50 in.
Maximum Recommended Rim Width (in): 6.50 in.
Asymmetrical Tread Pattern: No
Tread Depth: 8/32 in.
DOT-Approved: Yes
Tube Required: No
Tread Ply Quantity: 4
Quantity: Sold individually.
Notes: Front tire. This is a 4-ply tire with an 8-ply rating.
yea, i fugged that up
meant to post NOT a radial. and IS a radial.... il fix it.
i run a sportsman as well, for sure not a radial.
haha.
Old 12-04-2008 | 12:55 AM
  #58  
chrysler kid's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 6
From: Mckinney Plano Frisco
Default

Originally Posted by TJ
75mph continuous driving will put more heat in the tire than a quick 120mph blast will.
IMO, what you are doing is more dangerous than using them at the track.
no chance of building up sustained heat in a 8-12 second blip down the 1320.
i commute from dallas to lubbock 750 miles round trip. ive made that drive about 5 times now, takes about 5 and a half hours each way. never had any problems at all. im more worried about not having oem lugnuts to put the spare on with than anything
Old 12-04-2008 | 10:05 AM
  #59  
Camaro396's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,091
Likes: 7
From: Toledo, Oh
Default

Go buy some, I just had to, to put my stock rims on to roll the car around. Their like .75 cents each lol.
Old 12-04-2008 | 10:54 PM
  #60  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by chrysler kid
i commute from dallas to lubbock 750 miles round trip. ive made that drive about 5 times now, takes about 5 and a half hours each way. never had any problems at all. im more worried about not having oem lugnuts to put the spare on with than anything
everybody drives on them, i know. im just saying there CAN be an issue with them.
if you carry a spare, wrap some stock lugs up in a rag and put them with the spare tire so they dont rattle.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.