315/17 BFG radials vs 315/17 MTs
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
315/17 BFG radials vs 315/17 MTs
Alright, I've got 315 BFGs on my car now and at the track my car just destroys the BFGs, i cant launch it with anything resembling boost. I've heard the mickeys hook way better so i'm going to be switching to those.
I never BFH modded my inner fenders, just took it easy around corners. But do the mickeys rub more/less than the BFG? Panhard rod+bfh should help this right?
Any input would be appreciated, thanks.
I never BFH modded my inner fenders, just took it easy around corners. But do the mickeys rub more/less than the BFG? Panhard rod+bfh should help this right?
Any input would be appreciated, thanks.
#2
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
I use to run 315/35-17 BFG w/ ARTT2 17x11 on my camaro. A little bfh inside wheelwell was the only thing was done. The MT should be about the same overall width/height as the BFG. And yes, to me the MT's have a much softer/stickier compound, but will not last as long.
#10
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Waxahachie, Texas
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those have a treadwear of 200 and the one I pictured has a treadwear of 040, not the same compound. I am thinking of putting a set of those you pictured on the front of my car so I will have a matched brand of tire, they look good too but definately not near as sticky as the other.
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
Those have a treadwear of 200 and the one I pictured has a treadwear of 040, not the same compound. I am thinking of putting a set of those you pictured on the front of my car so I will have a matched brand of tire, they look good too but definately not near as sticky as the other.