Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

D1SC Guesswork

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2007, 05:07 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
E Wagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default D1SC Guesswork

Curious to see what all of you knowledgeable forum addicts think my new set up will make, HP of course.

Car is a 2002 Camaro SS Convertible. SDPC 402 6.0L Iron Block. 8.78:1 CR. Forged components with -22cc dish pistons. D1SC- 8 Rib with the ATI 3.400 pulley. (Likely 10-12 psi) Twin intercooler set up. Intake is FAST 90mm with macthing TB and 85mm SLP MAF. Fuel system is return set up with regulator. 60# Mototrons, FAST rails, Racetronix in tank and additional in line pump. Strange S60 rear with 3.73 gears. M6. Kooks headers and Y pipe. Cat free. Open breather PCV system. 93 Octane will be run. TR CAM - supposed to be 227/232, ended up 224/232. She is a street/show car in case you care. Heavy mother too. Will be taking it to Speed Inc. with 3 bar Dyno Tuning at end of month.

Just curious again...please no hating Educated ones, give me your guesstimates on HP/RWHP. Feel free to ask for more info if I forgot something u need.
Old 05-16-2007, 05:54 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
BIG BAD BLACKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any reason you went with teh compression you did? Ill be about the same on the 370 im building, but i hear 9.5:1 is where you want to be with the prochargers. Wondering whats being left on the table being lower compression?
Old 05-16-2007, 06:21 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
eb02z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Agreed-no idea why you would want the compression that low. 9.5 or higher is best.
Old 05-16-2007, 06:59 PM
  #4  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd say around 650 rwhp, as a guess. Bob
Old 05-16-2007, 07:05 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
BIG BAD BLACKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eb02z06
Agreed-no idea why you would want the compression that low. 9.5 or higher is best.
Speed inc swears up and down this is the best compression for me. Ill be at like 8.4 with what they suggested. Im like
Old 05-16-2007, 07:10 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
E Wagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My figuring was somewhere around 650-680 rwhp as well, Bob. Obviously my concerns are more in the realm of streetability and daily driver/travel status as opposed to making max power for racing. Have heard the same concerns about the CR from others. Have also heard that anywhere from 8.75:1 - 9.5:1 is good. TR set up the block set up for me. More appropriate for my needs would be the best answer I guess.
Old 05-16-2007, 10:38 PM
  #7  
11Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Gauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas (Richardson), TX, USA
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bob, what are your thoughts on the compression? I went with -9cc dished pistons on my shortblock rebuild in anticipation of a Procharger, but I don't have the heads I'll use with my Procharger yet. Your advice on this will have an impact on what combustion chamber size I go looking for.

I could probably get down to 9.0:1 or even 8.9:1 with 72cc chambers. Should I be aiming for more compression? (Keep in mind the Texas heat, but I'll have a FMIC)
Old 05-16-2007, 11:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
dixonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gauge
Bob, what are your thoughts on the compression? I went with -9cc dished pistons on my shortblock rebuild in anticipation of a Procharger, but I don't have the heads I'll use with my Procharger yet. Your advice on this will have an impact on what combustion chamber size I go looking for.

I could probably get down to 9.0:1 or even 8.9:1 with 72cc chambers. Should I be aiming for more compression? (Keep in mind the Texas heat, but I'll have a FMIC)
I am running -9cc pistons right now back to stock heads right now because the patriots were bad and AFR's aren't here yet and got good results. You want above 9.0:1. With the -9cc pistons maybe you should consider the 64cc chambers. No expert though.
Old 05-17-2007, 05:23 AM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
speedracer5532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eb02z06
Agreed-no idea why you would want the compression that low. 9.5 or higher is best.
I built my engine (LS2 403) with 9:1 CR and am running a F1A with 15.5lbs of boost on 93 octane pump gas, no meth, and just dynoed 914 rwhp.
Old 05-17-2007, 08:07 AM
  #10  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Originally Posted by Gauge
Bob, what are your thoughts on the compression? I went with -9cc dished pistons on my shortblock rebuild in anticipation of a Procharger, but I don't have the heads I'll use with my Procharger yet. Your advice on this will have an impact on what combustion chamber size I go looking for.

I could probably get down to 9.0:1 or even 8.9:1 with 72cc chambers. Should I be aiming for more compression? (Keep in mind the Texas heat, but I'll have a FMIC)
Anywhere in the 9.0:1 to 9.5:1 will work. There are so many different combinations out there, that it is really hard to say what will work better for you. Bob
Old 05-18-2007, 04:02 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
E Wagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks all for the input.
Old 05-19-2007, 02:31 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
ChaseSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

glad to see somebody went with the S60... how do you like it so far?
Old 05-19-2007, 09:01 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Rickys S/C Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MOREHEAD KY
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChaseSS
glad to see somebody went with the S60... how do you like it so far?
i was thinking the same thing???
Old 05-19-2007, 04:02 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
E Wagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

S60 seems excellent so far, will be adding the braced girdle type cover for this build. Obviously a heavy unit (238 lbs. I think) but once again it's a street/show set up and may only see a track a half a dozen times. Rear end has a definite whine in 4th/5th under acceleration while road driving, but easily ignored. In 6th and other gears you hear nothing. I can also drown it out with the stereo Definitely puts it to the ground, and I will be looking forward to the same with the new set up. (Had P1SC on stock engine.) I've tried to do everything as smartly as I could when I could afford to so I hope to never break anything. Will have some MT ET Street Radials on occasionally as well. Have heard that rear will be good to around 1000HP if my addiction continues to grow.



Quick Reply: D1SC Guesswork



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.