Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

lq4 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2012, 11:55 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slowswb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default lq4 question

I have a lq4 that i wanted to use ls2 rods and pistons in now the question do i have to get that stuff balanced do to fact that they are rods and pistons are different than a lq4?
Old 07-29-2012, 06:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slowswb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone?
Old 07-29-2012, 06:48 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
1BadBlkB1tch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Davenport,fl
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

me dealing and building bottom ends i always advise everyone to get your bottom end balanced always its not necessary but it depends on what crank lq4? then yes balance all day ls2 crank? then yes but you wouldnt really have to...as you can tell i love to have everything balanced and on par i dont cut corners dunno if that helps you man
Old 07-29-2012, 08:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
midevil1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

both motors are neutral balanced. I wouldn't waste my time and money balancing a stock bottom end. It will spin to 6800 with no problems without balancing..
Old 07-29-2012, 09:21 PM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by midevil1
both motors are neutral balanced. I wouldn't waste my time and money balancing a stock bottom end. It will spin to 6800 with no problems without balancing..
There's probably a big difference between the weight of the LQ4 dished pistons and the LS2 flat tops. At the very least, one should at least weigh the two to see what the difference is and see if it's needed or not. Not everyone would cut corners like you.
Old 07-30-2012, 01:29 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
slowswb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know people slap **** together but i dont want to do that with this motor i want to be safe. Thanks ill take everything to the machine shop and get it balanced than.
Old 07-30-2012, 08:42 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
1BadBlkB1tch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Davenport,fl
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very good choice sir
Old 07-31-2012, 08:46 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
kossuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Market, MD
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's always a good idea to balance a performance motor. A 15 gram weight difference @ static conditions becomes many pounds of force at 6,000 RPM banging against your bearings in an unequal manner in unequal directions. Are many fine without being balanced? Sure, but you're better off doing it and knowing it's right vs hoping it's right IMO.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.