Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A Mild Cam With A Non Aggressive Ramp Rate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2005, 02:09 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A Mild Cam With A Non Aggressive Ramp Rate?

Can anyone reccomend some cams that are mild with Non aggressive ramp rates. I dont want something that is going to slam the valve open and shut, I want to be as easy on the valvetrain as possible. I tried looking at what comp cams has but they dont list spec for every cam. Im looking for something with 216-222 Dur@.050 with between .530-.560 lift on a 114 LSA. Ive found two that come pretty close. Has anyone had any expeirence with these cams?


Crane 1449561 Adv. Dur.276/286 Dur@.050:216/224 .551/.551 LSA:115

Speed Inc. 1 Dur@.050:222/222 .563/.563 LSA:114

Comp Cams Dur@.050:216/220 .525/.532 LSA:114

Comp Cams Dur@.050:218/224 .527/.534 LSA:114

Last edited by LS1 PONTIAC GTO; 10-29-2005 at 04:41 PM.
Old 09-05-2005, 02:26 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Mild ramp rates would be below .550 lifts
The Lunati cam is similar to the old MTI Hammer cam IIRC
Both are good cams but not really mild.

A good old timer is the Comp 216/220, .525/.532 114+4
Old 09-05-2005, 03:03 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mild ramp rates would be below .550 lifts The Lunati cam is similar to the old MTI Hammer cam IIRC
Both are good cams but not really mild.

A good old timer is the Comp 216/220, .525/.532 114+4
Ah ok. So actually the Crane cam I listed would be a pretty good choice then. I still should be able to pass smog with thes cam and a good tune correct?
Old 09-05-2005, 04:39 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

With -10* overlap at .050 for sure, that Crane cam with a set of 1.7 variable lift rockers will make tons of trq, which is an added feature with the weight of the GTO.
Not a cheap setup, but worth it and very street friendly.
The only thing left to fully enjoy is a High Stall (I recommend VIG 3200)
Old 09-05-2005, 07:13 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

That Crane cam looks like the one I just bought from Vinci as their Boss II cam. They have it in two flavors, 113 LSA and 115 LSA. I went with the 115 LSA. Am still waiting on the rest of my parts (gaskets, etc.) to do the installation.

Vinci has a sound file of that cam on their web site if you are interested.
Old 09-05-2005, 08:06 PM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Crane cam looks like the one I just bought from Vinci as their Boss II cam. They have it in two flavors, 113 LSA and 115 LSA. I went with the 115 LSA. Am still waiting on the rest of my parts (gaskets, etc.) to do the installation.
Cool. Let me know how it turns out. Judging by the sound clip im not sure if this would get past the smog guys though.
Old 09-05-2005, 08:11 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Added some new possibilities to the list.
Old 09-05-2005, 08:24 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how about the TR22O on a 114lsa,.553 lift?i run that in my car,and i like it a lot.it's not as aggressive as a lot of the newer cams,and with a set of 918s or some duals springs you shouldn't have to worry about changing your springs every year,unless you pound on your car a lot.
Old 09-05-2005, 08:48 PM
  #9  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
LS2 Pontiac GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how about the TR22O on a 114lsa,.553 lift?i run that in my car,and i like it a lot.it's not as aggressive as a lot of the newer cams,and with a set of 918s or some duals springs you shouldn't have to worry about changing your springs every year,unless you pound on your car a lot.
Doesnt the TR220 Make the car sound like a sewing machine?
Old 09-06-2005, 01:17 AM
  #10  
Launching!
 
d james's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure how long vinci cams can go without spring changes but crane told me several times their cams are good for 60-100,000 spring life. they have cars that go to 100,000, but say to check by about 60,000. SDPC has some sersiously inexpesive crane cams that work with LS6 springs, you can custom the cams to the specs you want if your not happy with all the numbers.
Old 09-06-2005, 03:02 AM
  #11  
Naked AV
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't forget the Lingenfelter GT2-3....they sell it in a kit with LS6 springs, so it must have forgiving ramps, despite its relatively high lift:

207/220, .573/.580, 118.5 CL
Old 09-06-2005, 03:06 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Naked AV
Don't forget the Lingenfelter GT2-3....they sell it in a kit with LS6 springs, so it must have forgiving ramps, despite its relatively high lift:

207/220, .573/.580, 118.5 CL
Good cam but i wouldn't run any spring less than 918's with that cam.
Old 09-06-2005, 03:52 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The three you added have an LSA of 114, if the Vinci with a 115 won't get by the smog police, not sure how these will either.

Have you been to LS1sounds.com and listened to any of the cams out there?
Old 09-06-2005, 04:33 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
 
XTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
A good old timer is the Comp 216/220, .525/.532 114+4
This was and still is my favorite of the "old-timey" cams from the early days of the LS1 motor.
Old 09-06-2005, 08:01 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You can pick a grind using the Comp XE ramps. They are not as aggressive as the XE-R lobes.

TR's total lift is less than an XE-R, but the cam is similar to an XE-R from .006 - .200 so I would consider that aggressive. It helped make the TR 224 so drivable at time when tuning was fairly primitive.

If you are keeping the cats and going to tune it, I would vote for the 218/224 114.

Vettenuts: I'm not sure why Vinci was having problems with the smog police. A TR 224/224 114 has passed emmissions in many states. It does have faster ramps, so overlap at .006 is more like a 222/222 XE lobe cam. A 218/224 114 on the slower ramps will have maybe a hair more overlap at .006 than the TR 224 114. A good tune should deal with it. For an abundance of caution, an alternative would be to use a 115 LSA or go to 216/224 114.
Old 09-06-2005, 11:19 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
Vettenuts: I'm not sure why Vinci was having problems with the smog police. A TR 224/224 114 has passed emmissions in many states. It does have faster ramps, so overlap at .006 is more like a 222/222 XE lobe cam. A 218/224 114 on the slower ramps will have maybe a hair more overlap at .006 than the TR 224 114. A good tune should deal with it. For an abundance of caution, an alternative would be to use a 115 LSA or go to 216/224 114.
I was responding to his earlier comment that the Vinci cam sound file sounded like it wouldn't get by smog. My point was that if a 115 wouldn't, then the three new cams he is considering would likely have the same problem. Not sure any of them would really be a problem, unless they will flunk the car solely because they think a change has been made.
Old 09-06-2005, 11:51 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
equandt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wish-consin
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Comp Cams Dur@.050:216/220 .525/.532 LSA:114

This would be my pick. With a good set of heads this cam has made 400 RWHP.

I'm running the TR220 - 114 and love it. My car doesn't sound like a sewing machine. I get some valvetrain noise from 2000 - 2200 rpm but its not bad.

Last edited by equandt; 09-06-2005 at 12:41 PM.
Old 09-06-2005, 11:52 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The comp 216/220 is a great little cam. You can hear it with an open cutout, but would be disguised nicely running through a muffler. You'll pass smog with flying colors. With this cam you also won't have to worry about changing springs for a long time.
Old 09-06-2005, 06:44 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 PONTIAC GTO
Cool. Let me know how it turns out. Judging by the sound clip im not sure if this would get past the smog guys though.
And you do you plan to get buy them with your long tubes and catalytic converters in a non-stock location?
Old 09-06-2005, 06:55 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
smask04C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Haven, Fl.
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

vettenuts, you will be thrilled with the new cam. What other add ons are you installing with it?


Quick Reply: A Mild Cam With A Non Aggressive Ramp Rate?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 AM.